London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   Drivers refusing to work (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/3305-drivers-refusing-work.html)

Brimstone July 22nd 05 11:43 AM

Drivers refusing to work
 
steve wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:02:45 +0000, Brimstone wrote:

Boltar wrote:
Paul Corfield wrote:

This "enormous pressure" would therefore not resemble the "enormous
pressure" that the TU head offices are placing on their LU
officials to get staff to not drive trains due to "security
concerns".

They seem to forget about the pressure normal commuters are under.
The bombs are in the passenger section of the trains , not in the
drivers cab. They're probably in the safest part of the train.


The TU leaders need to seriously rethink their approach before this
backfires on them.

Its the RMT. Who expected anything different?


Apparently the unrest isn't about their own safety, but because of
the lack of communication from those on high during recent incidents.


Which means they can't drive trains?


Theyt can drive trains, but want to know what's going on and most
importantly what to do when someone detonates a bomb or somesuch. Lack of
information/communication leads to passengers being stuck on trains for
extended periods for no good reason.



Dave Liney July 22nd 05 03:32 PM

Drivers refusing to work
 

"Brimstone" wrote in message
...

Apparently the unrest isn't about their own safety, but because of
the lack of communication from those on high during recent incidents.


Which means they can't drive trains?


Theyt can drive trains, but want to know what's going on and most
importantly what to do when someone detonates a bomb or somesuch. Lack of
information/communication leads to passengers being stuck on trains for
extended periods for no good reason.


Considering it seemed that, in all the confusion of the events, no-one knew
what exactly had happened and what was going on it seems unfair to complain
that the management didn't let the drivers know what was generally unknown.

Dave.



Brimstone July 22nd 05 03:45 PM

Drivers refusing to work
 
Dave Liney wrote:
"Brimstone" wrote in message
...

Apparently the unrest isn't about their own safety, but because of
the lack of communication from those on high during recent
incidents.

Which means they can't drive trains?


Theyt can drive trains, but want to know what's going on and most
importantly what to do when someone detonates a bomb or somesuch.
Lack of information/communication leads to passengers being stuck on
trains for extended periods for no good reason.


Considering it seemed that, in all the confusion of the events,
no-one knew what exactly had happened and what was going on it seems
unfair to complain that the management didn't let the drivers know
what was generally unknown.


No one expects to be told what is unknown. However, when those responsible
refuse to answer the radio or phone then those at the sharp end are entitled
to ask questions I would suggest.




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk