![]() |
Orbital transport & urban motorways (was Warwick Gardens at night)
Dave Arquati wrote: Earl Purple wrote: Don't know what it's used for, but if it's just for freight they might be better placed in lorries on a road. I think I'm having a transport planning embolism. There isn't a world shortage of food. There is starvation in the world because of insufficient distribution. |
Orbital transport & urban motorways (was Warwick Gardens atnight)
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Dave Arquati wrote:
Earl Purple wrote: After that we hit the disused railway and just take our road along it. That railway isn't disused. Don't know what it's used for, but if it's just for freight they might be better placed in lorries on a road. I think I'm having a transport planning embolism. ZEPPELINS. tom -- Tech - No Babble |
Warwick Gardens at night (orbital rail)
Earl Purple wrote:
Yes, the A12 does provide an alternative route to Docklands just as my proposed extension of the West Cross Route would provide an alternative link from the A406 to the A40 (other than the A406 itself). By the way, much of Cricklewood and Harlesden are relatively undeveloped, and there's a disused railway line that crosses through Gladstone Park, so part of the space is already there (albeit not exactly the line I have drawn). The line through Gladstone Park is far from disused - it just doesn't have any passenger services. It was at one point proposed to use it for Heathrow Connect. A semi-orbital service from St Pancras or a Goblin extension, via Cricklewood and out to the west might well be useful, especially at Olympic time. Public transport loses out on journey time if the journey involves more than one change. So the best orbital services go about a third of the way round, overlapping with other orbital services, and continue outward or inward at both ends of the orbital section. This maximises the number of journeys that can be done with one change. Colin McKenzie |
Orbital transport & urban motorways (was Warwick Gardensat night)
Dave Arquati wrote:
You're missing a rather significant point - which is how the people on the M25 bus got onto it in the first place. You either need a large number of bus routes from each centre of population within the travel-to-work area for Staines, or you need feeder buses from the origin towns too. If it's the latter, as I suspect you are suggesting, then any journey to Staines that way will involve *at least* 2 changes. .... That perfect journey takes 55 minutes. The AA say it takes about 30 minutes by car. Therefore, the near-perfect PT alternative takes nearly twice as long. You may have provided a vastly superior PT service to the current offering, but it still can't compete with the car for orbital journeys. The additional problem is that this is a gross over-simplification. How likely is it that the commuter actually lives in Reigate town centre, or at least within a few hundred metres of the road between the town centre and the motorway? For most people, this problem can be much alleviated by cycling the first and/or last leg. When changing from PT to bike there is no waiting time, and because bike journey times are so accurately predictable, only a couple of minutes are lost when changing the other way. If people can easily and quickly get 2 or 3 miles to their transport hub, many fewer points need to be served by PT, and it becomes much easier for it to compete with the private car. From where I live, I can walk to two tube stations, on different lines, in 7 or 12 minutes respectively. But in 12 minutes I can cycle to at least 4 more stations, giving me access to about 6 extra rail and tube services. By starting by bike, I can get to much of London with no changes - and to virtually all of the south-east with one change. And the journey times will compete well with the car too. Colin McKenzie |
Orbital transport & urban motorways (was Warwick Gardensat night)
Tom Anderson wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Dave Arquati wrote: Earl Purple wrote: After that we hit the disused railway and just take our road along it. That railway isn't disused. Don't know what it's used for, but if it's just for freight they might be better placed in lorries on a road. I think I'm having a transport planning embolism. ZEPPELINS. Gah! -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk