![]() |
Bollards
I've recently noticed that a lot of the plastic lit-up bollards on traffic islands seem to be wrong - for instance, a plain white disc where there should be a leftward arrow, or a leftward arrow where there should be two diverging arrows, etc. Particularly bad is the route from Old Street tube station to New North Road, where every bollard seems to be wrong. Maybe the local kids have gone around rearranging them - it doesn't seem likely that they could be knocked down in pairs and accidentally switched. A solution could be to give the different styles of bollard different asymmetrical shapes at the bottom, with matching differently shaped metal frames set into the concrete - then it would be impossible to switch them or put them in the right hole the wrong way around. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
Bollards
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:02:58 -0000, "John Rowland"
wrote: A solution could be to give the different styles of bollard different asymmetrical shapes at the bottom, with matching differently shaped metal frames set into the concrete - then it would be impossible to switch them or put them in the right hole the wrong way around. Ask a bollard-installer if that's a solution :-) Or ask the storekeeper who has to stock 15 types of bollard-base. All of which will become obsolete NEXT time some wally has a bright idea. |
Bollards
"John Rowland" wrote in message ... I've recently noticed that a lot of the plastic lit-up bollards on traffic islands seem to be wrong - for instance, a plain white disc where there should be a leftward arrow, or a leftward arrow where there should be two diverging arrows, etc. Particularly bad is the route from Old Street tube station to New North Road, where every bollard seems to be wrong. Maybe the local kids have gone around rearranging them - it doesn't seem likely that they could be knocked down in pairs and accidentally switched. Assuming that you are right in what you think the bollards should be showing, it is probably down to what the bloke fitting replacement bollards has on board at the time. They are not going to be highly qualified traffic engineers and probably see no problem in fitting a different bollard. The only thing that stops you seeing keep right instead of keep left may be that keep right bollards are very rare and unlikely to be on the lorry in the first place. A solution could be to give the different styles of bollard different asymmetrical shapes at the bottom, with matching differently shaped metal frames set into the concrete - then it would be impossible to switch them or put them in the right hole the wrong way around. You then have the problem of ensuring that the bollard base fitting crew put the right one in to begin with. Colin Bignell |
Bollards
nightjar wrote: "John Rowland" wrote in message ... I've recently noticed that a lot of the plastic lit-up bollards on traffic islands seem to be wrong - for instance, a plain white disc where there should be a leftward arrow, or a leftward arrow where there should be two diverging arrows, etc. Particularly bad is the route from Old Street tube station to New North Road, where every bollard seems to be wrong. Maybe the local kids have gone around rearranging them - it doesn't seem likely that they could be knocked down in pairs and accidentally switched. Assuming that you are right in what you think the bollards should be showing, it is probably down to what the bloke fitting replacement bollards has on board at the time. They are not going to be highly qualified traffic engineers and probably see no problem in fitting a different bollard. The only thing that stops you seeing keep right instead of keep left may be that keep right bollards are very rare and unlikely to be on the lorry in the first place. A solution could be to give the different styles of bollard different asymmetrical shapes at the bottom, with matching differently shaped metal frames set into the concrete - then it would be impossible to switch them or put them in the right hole the wrong way around. You then have the problem of ensuring that the bollard base fitting crew put the right one in to begin with. Colin Bignell In the first place the engineer who designed the traffic scheme should have checked it before signing off the works and paying the bill. I think this is more likely to be the result of sloppy maintenance (these bollards are always being knocked over - preferable to the same thing happening to people). Next time you see one that is wrong do your community a favour and tell the Council so they can put it right sooner. |
Bollards
In uk.transport, John Rowland wrote:
A solution could be to give the different styles of bollard different asymmetrical shapes at the bottom, with matching differently shaped metal frames set into the concrete - then it would be impossible to switch them or put them in the right hole the wrong way around. That seems rather inflexible. I'd have a sticker on the diffuser showing the proper sign. And, for good measure, which way it should face. :-) -- Mike Barnes |
Bollards
On 21 Jan 2006 12:14:52 -0800, "umpston" wrote:
In the first place the engineer who designed the traffic scheme should have checked it before signing off the works and paying the bill. I think this is more likely to be the result of sloppy maintenance (these bollards are always being knocked over - preferable to the same thing happening to people). Next time you see one that is wrong do your community a favour and tell the Council so they can put it right sooner. Easily done online: http://streetfaults.tfl.gov.uk/newfault.shtml |
Bollards
"Marc Brett" wrote in message
... http://streetfaults.tfl.gov.uk/newfault.shtml I've reported a dozen faults (more serious than bollards) on that website a few months ago. Although they were in six different London boroughs, none have been fixed. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
Bollards
"umpston" wrote in message ups.com... .... In the first place the engineer who designed the traffic scheme should have checked it before signing off the works and paying the bill. I think this is more likely to be the result of sloppy maintenance ... That is why I referred to the bloke fitting replacement bollards. Colin Bignell |
Bollards
Mike Barnes wrote:
That seems rather inflexible. I'd have a sticker on the diffuser showing the proper sign. And, for good measure, which way it should face. :-) In the case of a keep left/keep right sign, it must be possible to have a swappable sign that's fitted in a 'window' at the top and secured in place somehow, to prevent kids playing around with it. Then you can have an arrow either way, plus other symbols can be placed in this 'window' so you don't need to carry a whole bollard for each sign. You can have 'pass both sides', 'no entry', 'cycles only/no cycles' etc. Jonathan |
Bollards
In uk.transport, Jonathan Morris wrote:
Mike Barnes wrote: That seems rather inflexible. I'd have a sticker on the diffuser showing the proper sign. And, for good measure, which way it should face. :-) In the case of a keep left/keep right sign, it must be possible to have a swappable sign that's fitted in a 'window' at the top and secured in place somehow, to prevent kids playing around with it. Then you can have an arrow either way, plus other symbols can be placed in this 'window' so you don't need to carry a whole bollard for each sign. You can have 'pass both sides', 'no entry', 'cycles only/no cycles' etc. Good thinking. However what I meant, and expressed poorly, was which way the *bollard* should face. -- Mike Barnes |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk