![]() |
Terry Morgan and longer Jubilee line trains
|
Terry Morgan and longer Jubilee line trains
Bob wrote: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Business/s...698519,00.html Bob Classic. The requirement was imposed because of concerns that passengers might become confused and fall on to the track while attempting to board a seventh carriage on trains which only had six. Kevin |
Terry Morgan and longer Jubilee line trains
wrote in message oups.com... Bob wrote: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Business/s...698519,00.html Bob Classic. The requirement was imposed because of concerns that passengers might become confused and fall on to the track while attempting to board a seventh carriage on trains which only had six. Kevin What about partially sighted or blind passengers who may not notice? |
Terry Morgan and longer Jubilee line trains
"Robert McCall" wrote in message
... wrote in message oups.com... Bob wrote: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Business/s...698519,00.html Bob Classic. The requirement was imposed because of concerns that passengers might become confused and fall on to the track while attempting to board a seventh carriage on trains which only had six. Kevin What about partially sighted or blind passengers who may not notice? Or the drunk... |
Terry Morgan and longer Jubilee line trains
|
Terry Morgan and longer Jubilee line trains
wrote in message oups.com... Bob wrote: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Business/s...698519,00.html Bob Classic. The requirement was imposed because of concerns that passengers might become confused and fall on to the track while attempting to board a seventh carriage on trains which only had six. Kevin Wasn't this to do with the limitations of the platform edge doors at the new stations, which couldn't be altered to open dependent on train length, ie not exactly comparable with the situation on the Subsurface railway. Still seems possible to have dealt with the issue even if platform staff had to stand by the doorways for a few days. Paul |
Terry Morgan and longer Jubilee line trains
Paul Scott wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Bob wrote: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Business/s...698519,00.html Bob Classic. The requirement was imposed because of concerns that passengers might become confused and fall on to the track while attempting to board a seventh carriage on trains which only had six. Kevin Wasn't this to do with the limitations of the platform edge doors at the new stations, which couldn't be altered to open dependent on train length, ie not exactly comparable with the situation on the Subsurface railway. Still seems possible to have dealt with the issue even if platform staff had to stand by the doorways for a few days. Paul It seems incredible that the platform edge doors couldn't be programmed for a 6 or 7 coach train and have some sort of detection system. Last week a space probe that has been in deep space for several years having collected dust from the tail of a comet landed back on earth but we can't have platform edge doors that can cope with variable train lengths. Kevin |
Terry Morgan and longer Jubilee line trains
wrote in message ups.com... Wasn't this to do with the limitations of the platform edge doors at the new stations, which couldn't be altered to open dependent on train length, ie not exactly comparable with the situation on the Subsurface railway. Still seems possible to have dealt with the issue even if platform staff had to stand by the doorways for a few days. Paul It seems incredible that the platform edge doors couldn't be programmed for a 6 or 7 coach train and have some sort of detection system. Last week a space probe that has been in deep space for several years having collected dust from the tail of a comet landed back on earth but we can't have platform edge doors that can cope with variable train lengths. Kevin Of course had they been programmable, H&S would probably have insisted on a weeks testing with empty trains of varying length anyway... Paul |
Terry Morgan and longer Jubilee line trains
|
Terry Morgan and longer Jubilee line trains
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
In article . com, writes It seems incredible that the platform edge doors couldn't be programmed for a 6 or 7 coach train and have some sort of detection system. We could have had them. Was it worth paying the extra for a once-in-a-lifetime event? Depends how much it would have cost. Here, i'll do it for free: int trainLength = train.getNumberOfCars() ; if ((trainLength 6) || (trainLength 7)) { throw new MalformedTrainException(train, "bad number of cars") ; } for (int i = 0 ; i trainLength ; ++i) { // assumes this is a headstop, if that's what it's called // tailstop is not much more complicated platform.edgeDoor((2 * i)).open() ; // the front one platform.edgeDoor(((2 * i) + 1)).open() ; // the back one } That ought to be tested before it goes into production use, though. tom -- Who would you help in a fight, Peter van der Linden or Bill Gates? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk