Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Colin wrote:
They have 'validators' on the platform (Think Oyster Card Pads without gates). So presumably on-train ticket examining staff will need oyster card readers? |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan J. Flavell wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Colin wrote: They have 'validators' on the platform (Think Oyster Card Pads without gates). So presumably on-train ticket examining staff will need oyster card readers? I believe many of the London TOC examining staff already do, so they can tell whether the Oyster you wave at them is really a Zone 1-6 travelcard or just a prepay with 10p on it... -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alan J. Flavell" wrote in message . gla.ac.uk... On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Colin wrote: They have 'validators' on the platform (Think Oyster Card Pads without gates). So presumably on-train ticket examining staff will need oyster card readers? Not necessarily - they can put gates on all of the other stations on the line so you would have to validate to get off anywhere but Watford. Therefore if you wanted to be charged the correct fare (or get out at these stations) then you would make sure you had swiped in at a Watford Junction validator. Similarly if you did not validate when you got off at Watford Junction then you could be overcharged for your journey. Notwithstanding the above, on-train staff already have oyster card readers in the SWT area, so it's not a new concept. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Feb 2006 14:24:11 -0800, "jonmorris"
wrote: .. rather than challenge them to a dual? Well, quite. I was just amazed that this was in the middle of the day - in full view of everyone, including the guard on the Silverlink train no doubt. I've never seen a Silverlink Metro guard emerge from the rear cab (on the NLL/WLL/Euston-Watford), except to change ends. In fact it was a while before I even realised the trains weren't DOO. |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:08:36 +0000, asdf
wrote: On 14 Feb 2006 14:24:11 -0800, "jonmorris" wrote: .. rather than challenge them to a dual? Well, quite. I was just amazed that this was in the middle of the day - in full view of everyone, including the guard on the Silverlink train no doubt. I've never seen a Silverlink Metro guard emerge from the rear cab (on the NLL/WLL/Euston-Watford), except to change ends. In fact it was a while before I even realised the trains weren't DOO. Euston to Watford has been OPO for about 20 years. -- _______ +---------------------------------------------------+ |\\ //| | Charles Ellson: | | \\ // | +---------------------------------------------------+ | | | // \\ | Alba gu brath |//___\\| |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Feb 2006 14:37:40 -0800, "MIG"
wrote: So does this all mean that TfL simply takes over the existing franchise, with 313s and 508s still going Euston to Watford and Bakerloo still going from Queens Park to Harrow? Initially, yes. The press release says new trains will be delivered within 5 years (it's not clear whether that's 5 years from the date of the press release or the transfer of control). That's not quite in line with previous discussion of the Bakerloo taking over the Watford service. According to the previous discussion, that's supposed to happen in 2010. I had visions of maybe relaying the fourth rail to Watford, and (less likely) keeping a service to South Hampsted and Kilburn High Road by installing a connection east of Queens Park, allowing trains from Euston to call at those stations, then use the unused platforms at Queens Park to allow for interchange, and then proceed semifast to Watford or beyond. I take it you're assuming the Watford-Euston DC service will be axed. Even if it is, South Hampstead and Kilburn High Road would probably stay open because of the proposed Queens Park to Stratford service - thus becoming "orbital" stations. Passengers for central London would be expected to walk to Swiss Cottage and Kilburn Park respectively (although if they're going to Euston it will take them a lot longer to get there). |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Feb 2006 15:45:53 -0800, "TheOneKEA"
wrote: Whats the betting that Zone 6 will move out to Watford Junction because of this? No need. Watford Met is in Zone A, along with Rickmansworth and Croxley Met. It would be simple to extend the lettered zones north of Harrow and Wealdstone to cover the remainder of the DC line. I don't think it's all that simple - you'd have to deal with the fact that tickets would (I assume) be inter-valid with Silverlink County. For single/return fares it's not too bad - the situation at Harrow & Wealdstone could be extended (i.e. charge the usual Oyster PAYG fares for the lettered zones, with NR fares applying north of Kenton for paper tickets - LU paper tickets not being valid). However, seasons would be tricker - you'd have to reconcile the fact that an annual Zones 1-A Travelcard season costs £1760 with the fact that a Watford Junction to All Zones NR season costs £2372. I suppose Watford Jn could be put in Zone D, but that would push up the price of local journeys. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() TheOneKEA wrote: Colin wrote: They have 'validators' on the platform (Think Oyster Card Pads without gates). Whats the betting that Zone 6 will move out to Watford Junction because of this? No need. Watford Met is in Zone A, along with Rickmansworth and Croxley Met. It would be simple to extend the lettered zones north of Harrow and Wealdstone to cover the remainder of the DC line. Well it'll have to be sorted out when the Met extends to Watford Junction after the Croxley Rail Link is completed... ;-) (I'm not holding my breath, btw) THC |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Colin wrote in uk.transport.london on Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:10:06 -0000
: Notwithstanding the above, on-train staff already have oyster card readers in the SWT area, so it's not a new concept. They have had them on WAGN for some time now, though to start with an Oystercard with a photocard was regarded by some WAGN RPIs as valid without checking with the reader, presumably on the basis that it looked as if it ought to have a season ticket on it? -- hike - a walking tour or outing, esp. of the self-conscious kind Chambers 20th Century Dictionary |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Hillam" ] wrote in message
... Colin wrote in uk.transport.london on Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:10:06 -0000 : Notwithstanding the above, on-train staff already have oyster card readers in the SWT area, so it's not a new concept. They have had them on WAGN for some time now, though to start with an Oystercard with a photocard was regarded by some WAGN RPIs as valid without checking with the reader, presumably on the basis that it looked as if it ought to have a season ticket on it? The silverstink's ticket-checking guard-fellas also have the readers, so if they can manage it, it's clearly not a massive issue :-P -- hike - a walking tour or outing, esp. of the self-conscious kind Chambers 20th Century Dictionary |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Overground from 11 Nov 2007 | London Transport | |||
Silverlink Metro and Oyster | London Transport | |||
TfL to get control of Silverlink Metro | London Transport News | |||
Why are Silverlink Metro trains NEVER on time ? | London Transport |