![]() |
Receipts for Oyster pre-pay?
|
Receipts for Oyster pre-pay?
|
Receipts for Oyster pre-pay?
In message , at 22:08:44 on
Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Tim Bray remarked: If I'm on a work trip to London, I just guess how much prepay I'm likely to burn, and top up that amount. So I go to the ticket machine, put a tenner in, press the receipt button and give the receipt for a tenner to the accountant. One size does not fit all. Some accountants (and/or auditors) are more picky than that. And no, that isn't "their problem", it's the claimant's problem. -- Roland Perry |
Receipts for Oyster pre-pay?
Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article , (Tim Bray) wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: That will only be a receipt for money put on the Oyster card, not for journeys made. If they won't accept that, then sounds like the problem is your accounts people, and not the ticketing system. But there is likely to be very poor concordance between putting cash on an Oyster Card and making journeys for which one is claiming expenses from the same source. I claim from three on different occasions. One is a local authority whose auditors expect receipts. You need to limit their expectations. They need to face the fact that you cannot get recipts for everything that it is reasonable to claim for. How do they cope with claims for money paid into a kerbside parking meter for example? Don't let the auditors/accountants dictate your terms. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Receipts for Oyster pre-pay?
"Colin Rosenstiel" wrote in message ... In article , (Tim Bray) wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: That will only be a receipt for money put on the Oyster card, not for journeys made. If they won't accept that, then sounds like the problem is your accounts people, and not the ticketing system. But there is likely to be very poor concordance between putting cash on an Oyster Card and making journeys for which one is claiming expenses from the same source. I claim from three on different occasions. One is a local authority whose auditors expect receipts. They would probably prefer me to use rail warrants even though that would cost them a lot more (you can't use a railcard with them). What happens if you use a car for the journey? Presumably they don't expect you to provide a receipt for the exact amount of petrol you have used. Peter Smyth |
Receipts for Oyster pre-pay?
In message , at 18:38:12 on Fri,
3 Mar 2006, Peter Smyth remarked: What happens if you use a car for the journey? Presumably they don't expect you to provide a receipt for the exact amount of petrol you have used. No, because the whole "car expenses" thing has been well documented by the Inland Revenue. There are specific pence-per-mile that you are allowed to claim (irrespective of what your actual costs were). Years ago, many companies would cap travel expenses at the BR railway fare for the same journey. Today, with so many different fares, even that is difficult. -- Roland Perry |
Receipts for Oyster pre-pay?
In message , Peter Smyth
writes What happens if you use a car for the journey? Presumably they don't expect you to provide a receipt for the exact amount of petrol you have used. Every organisation I have ever worked for requires a mileage for car journeys - they are then paid at an agreed rate (many keep it down to around 40p per a mile, irrespective of Inland Revenue rules, in order to be seen to encourage the use of public transport). But you are quite right on the general principle - expenses are often verified by reference to the distance involved, without need for receipts for small items such as bus journeys or London travelcards. -- Paul Terry |
Receipts for Oyster pre-pay?
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 18:38:12 on Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Peter Smyth remarked: What happens if you use a car for the journey? Presumably they don't expect you to provide a receipt for the exact amount of petrol you have used. No, because the whole "car expenses" thing has been well documented by the Inland Revenue. There are specific pence-per-mile that you are allowed to claim (irrespective of what your actual costs were). But how do the auditors audit the miles that you claim, which may of course be inflated by diversions to avoid jams or accidents? Ultimately they ought to recognise that some claims have to be judged by reasonableness rather than scruffy bits of paper. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Receipts for Oyster pre-pay?
Richard J.:
But how do the auditors audit the miles that you claim, which may of course be inflated by diversions to avoid jams or accidents? Ultimately they ought to recognise that some claims have to be judged by reasonableness rather than scruffy bits of paper. At this point I am reminded of one of the stories Richard Feynman told in his book "Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman". He was asked to speak at a university and promised an honorarium. Being no fan of university bureaucracies, he said "All right, but not I have to sign my name more more than 12 times -- and that includes endorsing the check." He was up to 11 signatures when they handed him the cheque and asked him to sign a receipt. He said, "No, you agreed I wouldn't have to sign anything else." And they said he had to take it because, now that he had earned the fee, they had no procedure for him *not* to be paid it! -- Mark Brader, Toronto | Any company large enough to have a research lab | is large enough not to listen to it. --Alan Kay My text in this article is in the public domain. |
Receipts for Oyster pre-pay?
In message , at
21:26:10 on Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Richard J. remarked: What happens if you use a car for the journey? Presumably they don't expect you to provide a receipt for the exact amount of petrol you have used. No, because the whole "car expenses" thing has been well documented by the Inland Revenue. There are specific pence-per-mile that you are allowed to claim (irrespective of what your actual costs were). But how do the auditors audit the miles that you claim, which may of course be inflated by diversions to avoid jams or accidents? When I've had such claims examined, they look at the start and finish point, and work out the miles by the most sensible direct route. If you make a detour that's at your own expense. Ultimately they ought to recognise that some claims have to be judged by reasonableness rather than scruffy bits of paper. There are too many people "on the fiddle" for that to be a realistic goal. -- Roland Perry |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk