![]() |
|
Worst Welcome
Yesterday I had occasion to travel to Heathrow and back to Paddington. It
may only be 15 minutes but unfortunately that is far too long to look if you are looking out of the window! I would like to propose the route between Ealing and Paddington as the most ugly of any approach to London. I accept that most of the routes have their less than salubrious sections, but the continuous mess of old sidings, decaying buildings, graffiti, rubbish and concrete underpasses combined with an already boring landscape makes this route the clear winner. Yes? Max B. |
Worst Welcome
I accept that most of the routes have their less than salubrious sections
but the continuous mess of old sidings, decaying buildings, graffiti, rubbish and concrete underpasses combined with an already boring landscape makes this route the clear winner. Yes? I got a Eurostar from Waterloo once, made me glad to see the back of London after it's journey through skankland, perhaps thats why CTRL is underground from West Kent, don't scare the tourists :) Brighton Main line isn't the nicest, but Orpington - London Bridge via Hither Green etc. isn't too bad. |
Worst Welcome
MaxB wrote:
Yesterday I had occasion to travel to Heathrow and back to Paddington. It may only be 15 minutes but unfortunately that is far too long to look if you are looking out of the window! I would like to propose the route between Ealing and Paddington as the most ugly of any approach to London. I accept that most of the routes have their less than salubrious sections, but the continuous mess of old sidings, decaying buildings, graffiti, rubbish and concrete underpasses combined with an already boring landscape makes this route the clear winner. Yes? Few large cities withstand such scrutiny - something is usually on the wrong side of rail tracks. M. |
Worst Welcome
marcb wrote:
Yesterday I had occasion to travel to Heathrow and back to Paddington. It may only be 15 minutes but unfortunately that is far too long to look if you are looking out of the window! I would like to propose the route between Ealing and Paddington as the most ugly of any approach to London. I accept that most of the routes have their less than salubrious sections, but the continuous mess of old sidings, decaying buildings, graffiti, rubbish and concrete underpasses combined with an already boring landscape makes this route the clear winner. Yes? Few large cities withstand such scrutiny - something is usually on the wrong side of rail tracks. The London approaches on the ECML[*] and WCML aren't too bad. The MML is slightly worse, but still far superior to the GWML or any of the SR termini. This reflects North London's innate superiority, naturally... [*] especially at the moment, when you get the excitement of the CTRL works and the new Arsenal stadium to look at... -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Worst Welcome
Yesterday I had occasion to travel to Heathrow and back to Paddington. It may only be 15 minutes
but unfortunately that is far too long to look if you are looking out of the window! I would like to propose the route between Ealing and Paddington as the most ugly of any approach to London. I accept that most of the routes have their less than salubrious sections, but the continuous mess of old sidings, decaying buildings, graffiti, rubbish and concrete underpasses combined with an already boring landscape makes this route the clear winner. Yes? Few districts are arranged in such a way that their best aspects point towards the railway tracks. |
Worst Welcome
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 13:12:16 -0000, TKD wrote:
Few districts are arranged in such a way that their best aspects point towards the railway tracks. Stansted Express wasn't a bad ride. -- jhk |
Worst Welcome
John B wrote:
The London approaches on the ECML[*] and WCML aren't too bad. The MML is slightly worse, but still far superior to the GWML or any of the SR termini. This reflects North London's innate superiority, naturally... Trus, as a north Londoner myself. I was thinking also of places where I've been recently such as Berlin and Dresden - bombsites by comparison (actually there is a nice river crossing in Dresden). M. |
Worst Welcome
"Jarle H Knudsen" wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 13:12:16 -0000, TKD wrote: Few districts are arranged in such a way that their best aspects point towards the railway tracks. Stansted Express wasn't a bad ride. Really? I commuted for a while between Hertford East and Lower Edmonton and found the route unremittingly awful. |
Worst Welcome
Stansted Express wasn't a bad ride.
My experience of the Stansted Express is it's like a dirty inner-london bone rattler, nothing compared to Southern Gatwick trains or the Heathrow Connect let alone Gatwick Express or (presumably) Heathrow Express. And that's just the trains. |
Worst Welcome
Paul Weaver wrote:
Stansted Express wasn't a bad ride. My experience of the Stansted Express is it's like a dirty inner-london bone rattler, nothing compared to Southern Gatwick trains or the Heathrow Connect let alone Gatwick Express or (presumably) Heathrow Express. And that's just the trains. Never been on a 4CIG to Brighton, then? More minging than the new Liberal leader, IMO. Equally, the inside of a StanEx 317 is nicer than the inside of a Thameslink 319. Doubtless when the 317s are replaced and the Electrostars are 25 years old, the story will be different. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:11 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk