London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   CONGESTION CHARGE (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/3984-congestion-charge.html)

funkymonkey March 15th 06 08:32 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Hi,

Can someone please tell me how you actually pay for the congestion
charge? I will be visiting London soon and a friend came back from
there and says he got stung with a large fine for not paying the toll
(through his car hire company). He said he never encountered any
toll-booths or e-tag systems. The exchange rate is bad enough without
getting stung with stupid fines. That said, I think it is a great
concept!

Chris


James Farrar March 15th 06 09:11 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
On 15 Mar 2006 01:32:37 -0800, "funkymonkey"
wrote:

Hi,

Can someone please tell me how you actually pay for the congestion
charge?


http://www.cclondon.com/howtopay.shtml

--
James Farrar
. @gmail.com

Paul Weaver March 15th 06 09:53 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
a friend came back from there and says he got stung with a large
fine for not paying the toll (through his car hire company).


Serves him right for not reading the dozens of warnings (not to mention
ignoring what the car hire company said). Why, as a tourist, did he
even want to drive through central London in the day?

He said he never encountered any toll-booths or e-tag systems.


That's because they are aincent technology that requires unneccersary
manpower. Of course they catch people on false plates, but blocking the
200 entrances to London would be impractical and add to congestion even
more.

He did encounter big warning signs saying "Congestion charge 0700-0630"

The exchange rate is bad enough without getting stung with stupid
fines. That said, I think it is a great concept!


The exchange rate is bad for americans because the dollar is crumbling
faster than a really crumbly cheesecake. No doubt you'll be invading
Iran soon enough as they want to sell oil in euros, resulting in even
more dollar devaluation.


Paul Terry March 15th 06 10:09 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
In message .com,
funkymonkey writes

Can someone please tell me how you actually pay for the congestion
charge? I will be visiting London soon and a friend came back from
there and says he got stung with a large fine for not paying the toll
(through his car hire company). He said he never encountered any
toll-booths or e-tag systems.


You have to pay either in advance or on the day that you travel (up to
midnight - but if you pay after 10pm there is a £2 surcharge). If you
are driving within the zone for several days, you will need to pay for
each day that the car is within the zone (even if just parked) -
although note that it operates only between 7.00a.m. and 6.30p.m.,
Monday to Friday (and not on public holidays).

You can pay on the WWW (http://www.cclondon.com/), by phone, at any of
the shops, car-parks or petrol stations that display the Congestion
Charge Paypoint sign, or in various other ways listed at the above site.

There are no toll booths, tickets or tags - the number plates of all
cars in the congestion zone are photographed automatically and then
compared at the end of the day with the list of those who've paid.

Driving and parking in central London is neither cheap nor easy (even
for those like me who have lived here for more than 50 years). Given
that the capital has excellent public transport, it is well worth
considering whether you really need a car for days spent in the central
area.
--
Paul Terry

Paul Terry March 15th 06 10:11 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
In message .com, Paul
Weaver writes

The exchange rate is bad for americans because the dollar is crumbling
faster than a really crumbly cheesecake. No doubt you'll be invading
Iran soon enough as they want to sell oil in euros, resulting in even
more dollar devaluation.


Why do you think someone with an Australian email address is American?
--
Paul Terry

marcb March 15th 06 10:24 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Paul Terry wrote:

if you pay after 10pm there is a £2 surcharge


Do you know why this was brought in? it seems a bit spiteful to me.

m.


Adrian March 15th 06 10:33 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
funkymonkey ) gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying :

Can someone please tell me how you actually pay for the congestion
charge? I will be visiting London soon and a friend came back from
there and says he got stung with a large fine for not paying the toll
(through his car hire company).


Some of which would be from TfL, the rest from the car hire company.

He said he never encountered any toll-booths or e-tag systems.


No, but he would have encountered umpteen shops and machines which would
allow him to pay.

Pay before 10pm and it's £8.
Pay between 10pm and midnight, and it's £10.
Miss that, and you're toast. Yes, it is a *******.

The exchange rate is bad enough


Hiho. Perhaps that's due to the Aussie Peso being A Bit ****?

Paul Terry March 15th 06 11:26 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
In message , marcb
writes

Paul Terry wrote:

if you pay after 10pm there is a £2 surcharge


Do you know why this was brought in? it seems a bit spiteful to me.


"To discourage late payment". In fact, I think the surcharge is less
than it was - when the CC charge was £5 the surcharge was a further £5
for payment after 10pm.

--
Paul Terry

Paul Weaver March 15th 06 03:59 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Paul Terry wrote:
Why do you think someone with an Australian email address is American?


'Cause I didn't look at the email address, and when someone neglects to
put their country of origin in, it usually means they are american.


d March 15th 06 04:23 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
"Paul Weaver" wrote in message
ups.com...
Paul Terry wrote:
Why do you think someone with an Australian email address is American?


'Cause I didn't look at the email address, and when someone neglects to
put their country of origin in, it usually means they are american.


good point :-P



Steve March 15th 06 05:18 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Can I correct you on the "Even if just parked" comment.
That is actually quite misleading and something TFL have never properly
corrected. Sure, if you come into the zone and park then you would need to
pay. But if the car is parked all the time between 7am and 6.30pm then there
is NO charge. You are only charged if the vehicle is in motion in the zone
in the time. I am a resident and despite the only concession that I get a
90% discount (but having to pay for 5 days at a time which therefore
encourages me to use it more had I only wanted to use it 1 day, but that's
another story) , as long as the car is parked and not moving during the day
I don't have to pay. My local plumber tends to come in early and park up
where he will be working for the day, as long as he doesnt leave until 6.30
he's doesnt need to pay. They certainly dont come round and take notes of
all the cars that are stationery, but there are mobile cameras on vans that
photograph moving vehicles.





"Paul Terry" wrote in message
...
In message .com,
funkymonkey writes

Can someone please tell me how you actually pay for the congestion
charge? I will be visiting London soon and a friend came back from
there and says he got stung with a large fine for not paying the toll
(through his car hire company). He said he never encountered any
toll-booths or e-tag systems.


You have to pay either in advance or on the day that you travel (up to
midnight - but if you pay after 10pm there is a £2 surcharge). If you are
driving within the zone for several days, you will need to pay for each
day that the car is within the zone (even if just parked) - although note
that it operates only between 7.00a.m. and 6.30p.m., Monday to Friday (and
not on public holidays).

You can pay on the WWW (http://www.cclondon.com/), by phone, at any of the
shops, car-parks or petrol stations that display the Congestion Charge
Paypoint sign, or in various other ways listed at the above site.

There are no toll booths, tickets or tags - the number plates of all cars
in the congestion zone are photographed automatically and then compared at
the end of the day with the list of those who've paid.

Driving and parking in central London is neither cheap nor easy (even for
those like me who have lived here for more than 50 years). Given that the
capital has excellent public transport, it is well worth considering
whether you really need a car for days spent in the central area.
--
Paul Terry




Paul Terry March 15th 06 05:47 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
In message , Steve
writes

Can I correct you on the "Even if just parked" comment.


You can try, but I don't think you'll succeed. :)

That is actually quite misleading and something TFL have never properly
corrected. Sure, if you come into the zone and park then you would need to
pay. But if the car is parked all the time between 7am and 6.30pm then there
is NO charge. You are only charged if the vehicle is in motion in the zone
in the time.


So how does that square with the following statement on the TfL site
(notice that it is "or parked" - not "and parked")?

If you have driven or parked on a public road in the charging
zone during charging hours and haven't paid the Congestion
Charge by midnight on the day of travel, your vehicle will be
identified by the cameras and you will be sent a Penalty Charge
Notice.

I am a resident


Ah !!!

as long as the car is parked and not moving during the day
I don't have to pay.


Yes, but that's a special concession for you lucky old residents - it
doesn't apply to the rest of us! To quote TfL on residents:

If you park in a resident's parking bay in your local parking
zone, or off-street inside the charging zone, and don't move
your car during the hours of operation, you don't need to pay
the charge.

As I say, that's a resident's perk. If you are not a resident you are
liable to pay the charge if the car is parked on a public road during
the charging period, even though it hasn't moved.

--
Paul Terry

[email protected] March 15th 06 05:51 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 

Steve wrote:
Can I correct you on the "Even if just parked" comment.
That is actually quite misleading and something TFL have never properly
corrected. Sure, if you come into the zone and park then you would need to
pay. But if the car is parked all the time between 7am and 6.30pm then there
is NO charge. You are only charged if the vehicle is in motion in the zone
in the time. I am a resident and despite the only concession that I get a
90% discount (but having to pay for 5 days at a time which therefore
encourages me to use it more had I only wanted to use it 1 day, but that's
another story) , as long as the car is parked and not moving during the day
I don't have to pay. My local plumber tends to come in early and park up
where he will be working for the day, as long as he doesnt leave until 6.30
he's doesnt need to pay. They certainly dont come round and take notes of
all the cars that are stationery, but there are mobile cameras on vans that
photograph moving vehicles.



Can I correct your correction? The questions and answers section
clearly says that even parked cars have to pay, unless they are in a
resident's parking place or off road.

see the following long link,

https://tfl-cc.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/tfl_cc.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_sid=Zq7kxy2i&p_lva=&p_faqid=1727

or goto www.cclondon.com and search for parked in the questions and
answers section, the 4th answer gives the details


Steve March 15th 06 07:04 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Ok, I stand corrected, either it's been changed or I have been wrongly
informed by TFL on at least 10 occasions since the charge was introduced.
However, that now implies that as well as the cameras, there must be
someone, presumably on foot or moped who is running around taking down the
number plates of all parked vehicles just in case. And I don't think that
happens as it would not be cost effective, (not that cost effectivness seems
to make any sense with TFL)
As I see it, the cameras are at the entrance to the zones and on the mobiles
van units, (which don't record numbers unless they are parked, and therefore
only monitoring moving vehicles.) I've certainly never seen anyone taking
down numbers of cars parked on meters/pay display etc. (unless you count
trafic wardens and they certainly dont feed car reg info back to TFL)









wrote in message
oups.com...

Steve wrote:
Can I correct you on the "Even if just parked" comment.
That is actually quite misleading and something TFL have never properly
corrected. Sure, if you come into the zone and park then you would need
to
pay. But if the car is parked all the time between 7am and 6.30pm then
there
is NO charge. You are only charged if the vehicle is in motion in the
zone
in the time. I am a resident and despite the only concession that I get a
90% discount (but having to pay for 5 days at a time which therefore
encourages me to use it more had I only wanted to use it 1 day, but
that's
another story) , as long as the car is parked and not moving during the
day
I don't have to pay. My local plumber tends to come in early and park up
where he will be working for the day, as long as he doesnt leave until
6.30
he's doesnt need to pay. They certainly dont come round and take notes of
all the cars that are stationery, but there are mobile cameras on vans
that
photograph moving vehicles.



Can I correct your correction? The questions and answers section
clearly says that even parked cars have to pay, unless they are in a
resident's parking place or off road.

see the following long link,

https://tfl-cc.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/tfl_cc.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_sid=Zq7kxy2i&p_lva=&p_faqid=1727

or goto www.cclondon.com and search for parked in the questions and
answers section, the 4th answer gives the details




Adrian March 15th 06 07:52 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
john doe ) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying :

so what would happen if i was working nights on the railways and drove
into the charge zone at 00.30 on a tuesday morning, parked up in a
railway yard and drove out again at 00.30 on the weds morning?


Umm, nothing, because you haven't had the car on the road inside the CC
hours...

or came in and out at the same times but parked on a public road?


The CC would pale into nothingness compared to the parking ticket...

Martin Smith March 15th 06 07:53 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:04:46 +0000 (UTC),
Steve wrote:
Ok, I stand corrected, either it's been changed or I have been wrongly
informed by TFL on at least 10 occasions since the charge was introduced.
However, that now implies that as well as the cameras, there must be
someone, presumably on foot or moped who is running around taking down the
number plates of all parked vehicles just in case. And I don't think that
happens as it would not be cost effective, (not that cost effectivness seems
to make any sense with TFL)
As I see it, the cameras are at the entrance to the zones and on the mobiles
van units, (which don't record numbers unless they are parked, and therefore
only monitoring moving vehicles.) I've certainly never seen anyone taking
down numbers of cars parked on meters/pay display etc. (unless you count
trafic wardens and they certainly dont feed car reg info back to TFL)


I have on a number of occassions seen people wearing jackets with
the C-charge logo on the back taking the numbers of cars and other
vehicles parked mainly on the forecourts of various premises in
Blackfriars Road, I dont remember how they got there, they may even
have been on scooters or mopeds.










wrote in message
oups.com...

Steve wrote:
Can I correct you on the "Even if just parked" comment.
That is actually quite misleading and something TFL have never properly
corrected. Sure, if you come into the zone and park then you would need
to
pay. But if the car is parked all the time between 7am and 6.30pm then
there
is NO charge. You are only charged if the vehicle is in motion in the
zone
in the time. I am a resident and despite the only concession that I get a
90% discount (but having to pay for 5 days at a time which therefore
encourages me to use it more had I only wanted to use it 1 day, but
that's
another story) , as long as the car is parked and not moving during the
day
I don't have to pay. My local plumber tends to come in early and park up
where he will be working for the day, as long as he doesnt leave until
6.30
he's doesnt need to pay. They certainly dont come round and take notes of
all the cars that are stationery, but there are mobile cameras on vans
that
photograph moving vehicles.



Can I correct your correction? The questions and answers section
clearly says that even parked cars have to pay, unless they are in a
resident's parking place or off road.

see the following long link,

https://tfl-cc.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/tfl_cc.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_sid=Zq7kxy2i&p_lva=&p_faqid=1727

or goto www.cclondon.com and search for parked in the questions and
answers section, the 4th answer gives the details





--
Martin Smith

James March 15th 06 08:10 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
I work in the congestion zone and regularly see congestion charge wardens
walking round taking down the reg numbers of parked cars. The wear high vis
coats so mabye confused with traffic wardens. They have the congestion
charge logo as the badge on there hats. They carry electronic ticket
machines and place fines on cars.

James


"Steve" wrote in message
...
Ok, I stand corrected, either it's been changed or I have been wrongly
informed by TFL on at least 10 occasions since the charge was introduced.
However, that now implies that as well as the cameras, there must be
someone, presumably on foot or moped who is running around taking down the
number plates of all parked vehicles just in case. And I don't think that
happens as it would not be cost effective, (not that cost effectivness
seems to make any sense with TFL)
As I see it, the cameras are at the entrance to the zones and on the
mobiles van units, (which don't record numbers unless they are parked, and
therefore only monitoring moving vehicles.) I've certainly never seen
anyone taking down numbers of cars parked on meters/pay display etc.
(unless you count trafic wardens and they certainly dont feed car reg info
back to TFL)









wrote in message
oups.com...

Steve wrote:
Can I correct you on the "Even if just parked" comment.
That is actually quite misleading and something TFL have never properly
corrected. Sure, if you come into the zone and park then you would need
to
pay. But if the car is parked all the time between 7am and 6.30pm then
there
is NO charge. You are only charged if the vehicle is in motion in the
zone
in the time. I am a resident and despite the only concession that I get
a
90% discount (but having to pay for 5 days at a time which therefore
encourages me to use it more had I only wanted to use it 1 day, but
that's
another story) , as long as the car is parked and not moving during the
day
I don't have to pay. My local plumber tends to come in early and park up
where he will be working for the day, as long as he doesnt leave until
6.30
he's doesnt need to pay. They certainly dont come round and take notes
of
all the cars that are stationery, but there are mobile cameras on vans
that
photograph moving vehicles.



Can I correct your correction? The questions and answers section
clearly says that even parked cars have to pay, unless they are in a
resident's parking place or off road.

see the following long link,

https://tfl-cc.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/tfl_cc.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_sid=Zq7kxy2i&p_lva=&p_faqid=1727

or goto www.cclondon.com and search for parked in the questions and
answers section, the 4th answer gives the details






Steve March 15th 06 09:04 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Why would these CC people be placing fines on the cars. How do they know
that the owner of the car
isn't going to pay before 10pm as they are allowed to do?




"James" wrote in message
. uk...
I work in the congestion zone and regularly see congestion charge wardens
walking round taking down the reg numbers of parked cars. The wear high vis
coats so mabye confused with traffic wardens. They have the congestion
charge logo as the badge on there hats. They carry electronic ticket
machines and place fines on cars.

James


"Steve" wrote in message
...
Ok, I stand corrected, either it's been changed or I have been wrongly
informed by TFL on at least 10 occasions since the charge was introduced.
However, that now implies that as well as the cameras, there must be
someone, presumably on foot or moped who is running around taking down
the number plates of all parked vehicles just in case. And I don't think
that happens as it would not be cost effective, (not that cost
effectivness seems to make any sense with TFL)
As I see it, the cameras are at the entrance to the zones and on the
mobiles van units, (which don't record numbers unless they are parked,
and therefore only monitoring moving vehicles.) I've certainly never seen
anyone taking down numbers of cars parked on meters/pay display etc.
(unless you count trafic wardens and they certainly dont feed car reg
info back to TFL)









wrote in message
oups.com...

Steve wrote:
Can I correct you on the "Even if just parked" comment.
That is actually quite misleading and something TFL have never properly
corrected. Sure, if you come into the zone and park then you would need
to
pay. But if the car is parked all the time between 7am and 6.30pm then
there
is NO charge. You are only charged if the vehicle is in motion in the
zone
in the time. I am a resident and despite the only concession that I get
a
90% discount (but having to pay for 5 days at a time which therefore
encourages me to use it more had I only wanted to use it 1 day, but
that's
another story) , as long as the car is parked and not moving during the
day
I don't have to pay. My local plumber tends to come in early and park
up
where he will be working for the day, as long as he doesnt leave until
6.30
he's doesnt need to pay. They certainly dont come round and take notes
of
all the cars that are stationery, but there are mobile cameras on vans
that
photograph moving vehicles.



Can I correct your correction? The questions and answers section
clearly says that even parked cars have to pay, unless they are in a
resident's parking place or off road.

see the following long link,

https://tfl-cc.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/tfl_cc.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_sid=Zq7kxy2i&p_lva=&p_faqid=1727

or goto www.cclondon.com and search for parked in the questions and
answers section, the 4th answer gives the details








Mark Brader March 15th 06 09:26 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Paul Weaver:
He did encounter big warning signs saying "Congestion charge 0700-0630"


I don't think so.
--
Mark Brader | "I wish to inform you now that the square peg is now
Toronto | in square whole and can be voguish for that your
| payment is being processed..." --seen in spam

Adrian March 15th 06 09:28 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Mark Brader ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying :

He did encounter big warning signs saying "Congestion charge 0700-0630"


I don't think so.


If he didn't, then he didn't enter the Kengestion zone... Or he had his
eyes closed...

tim \(in Sweden\) March 15th 06 10:08 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 

"Mark Brader" wrote in message
...
Paul Weaver:
He did encounter big warning signs saying "Congestion charge 0700-0630"


I don't think so.


Would that be because the signs actually say:

"Congestion ChargING" .... 7am-6.30pm

http://www.cclondon.com/images/signs...entry_sign.jpg

tim



Mark Brader March 16th 06 06:04 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Paul Weaver:
He did encounter big warning signs saying "Congestion charge 0700-0630"


Mark Brader:
I don't think so.


"Adrian":
If he didn't, then he didn't enter the Kengestion zone... Or he had his
eyes closed...


Well (cough), *somebody* has his eyes closed...
--
Mark Brader, Toronto | I am a mathematician, sir. I never permit myself
| to think. --Stuart Mills (Carr: The Three Coffins)

Adrian March 16th 06 06:45 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Mark Brader ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying :

He did encounter big warning signs saying "Congestion charge
0700-0630"


I don't think so.


If he didn't, then he didn't enter the Kengestion zone... Or he had
his eyes closed...


Well (cough), *somebody* has his eyes closed...


looks at times... groan
Oh, OK, so the wording's ever so slightly out... Sue me. You KNOW what was
meant...
sticks tongue out

Paul Weaver March 16th 06 06:58 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
john doe (james) wrote:
if i was working nights on the railways and drove into
the charge zone at 00.30 on a tuesday morning, parked up in a railway yard
and drove out again at 00.30 on the weds morning?


One hell of a night shift, I thought 12 hours was bad, but 24? I trust
you wont drive back after that.

The railway yard isn't covered by the congestion charge (are there any
in the CC area anyway?), the public road is, and you'll have to pay.
Sucks, I know, it's the usual shiftism that the world has.


Adrian March 16th 06 07:06 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Paul Weaver ) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying :

if i was working nights on the railways and drove into
the charge zone at 00.30 on a tuesday morning, parked up in a railway
yard and drove out again at 00.30 on the weds morning?


The railway yard isn't covered by the congestion charge (are there any
in the CC area anyway?), the public road is, and you'll have to pay.


Why? Half past midnight isn't "live" charge-time.

Since the car isn't on the road inside the charge zone at charge-time,
there's nothing to pay. Of course, they'd happily accept your £8, I'm
sure...

Mark Brader March 16th 06 10:23 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
"Adrian" writes:
Why? Half past midnight isn't "live" charge-time.


Funny, that's not what you thought before. :-)
--
Mark Brader, Toronto "Don't be silly -- send it to Canada"
-- British postal worker

Adrian March 16th 06 10:48 AM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Mark Brader ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying :

Why? Half past midnight isn't "live" charge-time.


Funny, that's not what you thought before. :-)


mutters
You're not funny, y'know.

Adrian March 16th 06 02:20 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Paul Weaver ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying :

Why? Half past midnight isn't "live" charge-time.


No, but if he leaves it on the public road for 24 hours it will be
parked in the charge time.


But it was explicitly stated it wouldn't be.

Since the car isn't on the road inside the charge zone at charge-time,


If he parks in the railway yard.


Which was explicitly stated...

if i was working nights on the railways and drove into
the charge zone at 00.30 on a tuesday morning, parked up in a railway
yard and drove out again at 00.30 on the weds morning?


24 hour night shifts sound like a killer though


Indeed. But maybe there's an extended rest period at the other end of a
rail journey?

Clive March 18th 06 02:38 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
In message . 170,
Adrian writes
Indeed. But maybe there's an extended rest period at the other end of a
rail journey?

40 years ago on the Western it was called "Double Home", you would work
from a city say Bristol to another say Birmingham, then stay and sleep
in a railway hostel then perform you next shift back home, simple
really.
--
Clive

Paul Weaver March 18th 06 11:23 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 

Adrian wrote:
Paul Weaver ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying :

Why? Half past midnight isn't "live" charge-time.


No, but if he leaves it on the public road for 24 hours it will be
parked in the charge time.


But it was explicitly stated it wouldn't be.


Original post stated:
or came in and out at the same times *but parked on a public road?*



Adrian March 19th 06 07:11 PM

CONGESTION CHARGE
 
Adrian ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying :

Why? Half past midnight isn't "live" charge-time.


No, but if he leaves it on the public road for 24 hours it will be
parked in the charge time.


But it was explicitly stated it wouldn't be.


Original post stated:
or came in and out at the same times *but parked on a public road?*


Snip less, and read more. Look closer to this post.

Message-ID: . 170


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk