Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just about every night last week the Hammersmith & City line was either
delayed or not running at all. Couple that with problems on the Circle Line and I ended up using the only reliable way across town Friday evening. My Feet :-) I keep hearing about speed restrictions and buckled tracks. Is this genuine or another way for the LU management to have a pop at the private enterprise scheme put in place by Ken ? Whatever as always the public seem to get caught in the middle of these things. -- Edward Cowling London UK |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edward Cowling wrote
Just about every night last week the Hammersmith & ****ty line was either delayed or not running at all. Does anyone ever use this line (aside from the trackshare bits)? I've always found it faster to use the District/Picc/Central. The lack of time indicators at stations West of Paddington (inclusive) doesn't help either. Be nice if, on Paddington station, they had a sign in the main concourse saying "next H&C train 12 minutes" |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message .com, Paul
Weaver writes Edward Cowling wrote Just about every night last week the Hammersmith & ****ty line was either delayed or not running at all. Does anyone ever use this line (aside from the trackshare bits)? I've always found it faster to use the District/Picc/Central. The lack of time indicators at stations West of Paddington (inclusive) doesn't help either. Be nice if, on Paddington station, they had a sign in the main concourse saying "next H&C train 12 minutes" Travelling from Aldgate East it's by far the best way of getting to Moorgate or Kings Cross. I took the District to Monument on Friday to get the circle line, only to end up being directed back to Aldgate East because the Circle Line was FUBAR. I thought part of the deal with the congestion charge was Ken got his £8 quid a go (A fiver then) and we got a decent transport system. This one we've got appears to be disintegrating. -- Edward Cowling London UK |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 May 2006 11:46:05 +0100, Edward Cowling London UK
wrote: Just about every night last week the Hammersmith & City line was either delayed or not running at all. Couple that with problems on the Circle Line and I ended up using the only reliable way across town Friday evening. My Feet :-) I keep hearing about speed restrictions and buckled tracks. Is this genuine or another way for the LU management to have a pop at the private enterprise scheme put in place by Ken ? Whatever as always the public seem to get caught in the middle of these things. As has been posted several times this is a failure by Metronet to plan a preventative activity to stress the rails to allow for warmer weather. I hardly think this is "people having a pop" for the sake of it. It is a complete and utter failure and incompetence on the part of Metronet. Various parts of the District, Picc (where maintained by MRSSL) and Met Lines are all directly affected. All the other sub surface lines like the H&C suffer the knock on from the loss of capacity from having to run at slow speed. The trains must run at slow speed or else the rails may buckle risking a derailment. The District Line has had two consecutive weekends of closures in East London to give Metronet the chance to catch up on work they should have done months ago. Expect more closures elsewhere to deal with the remaining problems. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Weaver wrote:
Just about every night last week the Hammersmith & ****ty line was either delayed or not running at all. Does anyone ever use this line (aside from the trackshare bits)? I regularly use Liverpool Street to Aldgate East but have several times found it easier to go to Aldgate and physically walk to Aldgate East for the District. The indicators at Liverpool Street need to change to a "next train to" format rather than the standard ones that give no indication as to how long one has to wait for a H&C train. Otherwise I occassionally use it for going to places near the H&C only stations, but other than the occasional east London to north trip I never use it for interchange journeys. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 May 2006 14:25:26 +0100, Edward Cowling London UK wrote:
Does anyone ever use this line (aside from the trackshare bits)? Travelling from Aldgate East it's by far the best way of getting to Moorgate or Kings Cross. However, from anywhere east of Mile End, if a District turns up first (as is usually the case), it's quicker to take it and cross over to the Central at Mile End then pick up the Met/Circle/H&C at Liverpool Street, rather than wait around for an H&C. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Paul Weaver wrote:
Edward Cowling wrote Just about every night last week the Hammersmith & ****ty line was either delayed or not running at all. Does anyone ever use this line (aside from the trackshare bits)? I've always found it faster to use the District/Picc/Central. The lack of time indicators at stations West of Paddington (inclusive) doesn't help either. Be nice if, on Paddington station, they had a sign in the main concourse saying "next H&C train 12 minutes" A couple of colleagues use it regularly; both work at UCL, which is hard by Euston Square station, and live near either Royal Oak or Shepherd's Bush (i think - somewhere out west, anyway). The one who lives in Shepherd's Bush could get the Central line, but it would involve a walk or a change, so usually doesn't. I used to use it when i lived in Clapton to visit a friend who lived in Stepney Green; train to Liverpool Street, H&C to Stepney. stupid and character-set-dependent nerd joke Instead of the H&C, can we just call it the @? /stupid and character-set-dependent nerd joke tom -- I really don't know what any of this **** means, but it looks impressive. -- zerolives, on YVFC |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote:
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Paul Weaver wrote: Edward Cowling wrote Just about every night last week the Hammersmith & ****ty line was either delayed or not running at all. Does anyone ever use this line (aside from the trackshare bits)? I've always found it faster to use the District/Picc/Central. The lack of time indicators at stations West of Paddington (inclusive) doesn't help either. Be nice if, on Paddington station, they had a sign in the main concourse saying "next H&C train 12 minutes" A couple of colleagues use it regularly; both work at UCL, which is hard by Euston Square station, and live near either Royal Oak or Shepherd's Bush (i think - somewhere out west, anyway). The one who lives in Shepherd's Bush could get the Central line, but it would involve a walk or a change, so usually doesn't. I find using the Central & Victoria lines to get from Shepherd's Bush to UCL (via Warren St) vastly superior to the H&C - even with the reasonably lengthy change at Oxford Circus, the C&V route is quicker, more frequent and more reliable. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Dave Arquati wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote: On Sun, 14 May 2006, Paul Weaver wrote: Edward Cowling wrote Just about every night last week the Hammersmith & ****ty line was either delayed or not running at all. Does anyone ever use this line (aside from the trackshare bits)? I've always found it faster to use the District/Picc/Central. The lack of time indicators at stations West of Paddington (inclusive) doesn't help either. Be nice if, on Paddington station, they had a sign in the main concourse saying "next H&C train 12 minutes" A couple of colleagues use it regularly; both work at UCL, which is hard by Euston Square station, and live near either Royal Oak or Shepherd's Bush (i think - somewhere out west, anyway). The one who lives in Shepherd's Bush could get the Central line, but it would involve a walk or a change, so usually doesn't. I find using the Central & Victoria lines to get from Shepherd's Bush to UCL (via Warren St) vastly superior to the H&C - even with the reasonably lengthy change at Oxford Circus, the C&V route is quicker, more frequent and more reliable. Blimey. A trip involving a rush-hour change at Oxford Circus is better? I had no idea the H&C was *that* bad. I'll mention it - although the colleague in question is just starting a new job near Old Street, and is considering moving too! tom -- Science which is distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Dave Arquati wrote: Tom Anderson wrote: On Sun, 14 May 2006, Paul Weaver wrote: Edward Cowling wrote Just about every night last week the Hammersmith & ****ty line was either delayed or not running at all. Does anyone ever use this line (aside from the trackshare bits)? I've always found it faster to use the District/Picc/Central. The lack of time indicators at stations West of Paddington (inclusive) doesn't help either. Be nice if, on Paddington station, they had a sign in the main concourse saying "next H&C train 12 minutes" A couple of colleagues use it regularly; both work at UCL, which is hard by Euston Square station, and live near either Royal Oak or Shepherd's Bush (i think - somewhere out west, anyway). The one who lives in Shepherd's Bush could get the Central line, but it would involve a walk or a change, so usually doesn't. I find using the Central & Victoria lines to get from Shepherd's Bush to UCL (via Warren St) vastly superior to the H&C - even with the reasonably lengthy change at Oxford Circus, the C&V route is quicker, more frequent and more reliable. Blimey. A trip involving a rush-hour change at Oxford Circus is better? I had no idea the H&C was *that* bad. I'll mention it - although the colleague in question is just starting a new job near Old Street, and is considering moving too! The poor frequency of the H&C makes it busy, whilst the flat junctions make it extremely slow in the central section. The run between Hammersmith and Paddington isn't so bad. After that though, there's a danger that any problem on the Circle, District or Met will snowball to all the other subsurface lines. The H&C and Circle seem to get the brunt because they share will all the others. If a full H&C train gets turfed out at Edgware Road en route to the City, it's a complete nightmare - it seems to take the next three Circle/H&C trains to accommodate everyone. Automatic operation on the Central and Victoria lines seems to make a big difference to running times, and my personal experience of both is of quite high reliability. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL v. Hamm/Fulham | London Transport | |||
F&*&%^& toilets | London Transport | |||
White City station on Hammermith & City | London Transport | |||
Hammersmith & City strike on 13 November | London Transport | |||
LU to close Waterloo&City line to save money. | London Transport |