Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Duncan wrote:
"The return portion of these tickets is restricted if you join a northbound train within area B of the London Travelcard Area on the route map overleaf, but is unrestricted if you join a northbound train in area C or D." Which should probably have read as follows:- "The return portion of these ticket types is restricted if you hold the return half of a ticket with the outward destination[1] within area B of the London Travelcard Area on the route map overleaf, and the origin within area D (or whatever it was), but is unrestricted if you hold the return half of such a ticket with the outward destination within area C or D." I do not believe there is any scope within the fares system to implement precisely what is being described above, as there may exist Saver fares over which FCC have no control which may nonetheless be valid on their services. I suspect they have simplified it to make it easier to understand, but have instead introduced confusion and theoretical loopholes. The way restrictions work, the flow (origin and destination) is important as restrictions are defined in those terms. [1] I cannot think of a better wording. Hopefully you know what I mean... Neil |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interestingly, it also states that travelling south is not affected at
all. So you can still get use a CDR to travel back to East Croydon or Gatwick between 4pm and 7pm. This is due of course to 'keeping consistency with other operators who run south of London'... effectively saying that they can't implement it, otherwise everyone would go on Southern instead! |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Masson wrote: As I read the leaflet you can use any ODTC, including an out-boundary one, for an evening peak journey entirely within the Travelcard zones. Yes, and there is no way they can ever change this. You can always use an off-peak travelcard, irrespective of the origin point, on any train for any journey within the travelcard zones. So yes you CAN use a Luton or Bedford to London all zones off peak travelcard between London and Elstree & Borehamwood, without restriction, and there is no way they can ever stop you. |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stewart Brodie wrote:
So we've had the removal of the refreshments services Silly, as it wasn't costing First anything to have and seemed like a good customer benefit! removal of the onboard announcements from the lovely lady Not sure we can blame them for this. Sure, they haven't been able to re-record the 'West Anglia Great Northern' bit, but it seems the issue is with drivers too lazy to set the system up (and, they're the same drivers from before). The 317's now have screens, but they're yet to be enabled to do anything more than tell the time (badly in many cases). and now bans on actually travelling by train. A silly one too, as you can get around it in a number of ways (well, not so easily to Cambridge, but certainly other stations just outside the Travelcard area). I wonder what other improvements First have lined up? A move to diesel stock to solve problems with stock? If they bid for the Central Trains franchise, they would then continue north of Peterborough with diesel too, which might be considered a good thing. Shame, then, that's it all just rumour at the moment. I notice that they've made a start on their number one priority: repainting the trains or putting stickers on the side. Actually, they've done one Thameslink train and one GN train.. the rest all being stickered up (except 317's which First have forgotten about completely). Are they allowed to change the terms & conditions of tickets that have already been issued? e.g. if I'd bought my Saver ticket 3 weeks ago (it allows the return journey up to 1 month from the ticket date) I'd guess not. I wouldn't worry though. They're not allowed to issue penalty fares, so can only charge the difference. Just travel as normal and you'll probably find the grippers won't have time to deal with all the problems they're going to have. Fare evaders will get off scot free meanwhile. Jonathan |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stuart Bell wrote:
... and if you do that it's always worth bearing in mind that your 'gold card' season ticket *counts* as a network rail card, so gives you a third off for off-peak travel. If I buy three people a discounted travelcard with my Gold Card (and their ticket is marked GOLDC), I wonder if they can travel with me during the restricted evening period? Logic says no, as it's an off peak ticket, but surely if they haven't implicitly mentioned discounted/gold card tickets then they can't enforce the ruling as it is technically a different ticket? Jonathan |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message .com, at
15:21:44 on Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Jonathan Morris remarked: I wonder what other improvements First have lined up? A move to diesel stock to solve problems with stock? If they bid for the Central Trains franchise, they would then continue north of Peterborough with diesel too, which might be considered a good thing. Shame, then, that's it all just rumour at the moment. FFC's leaflet about evening restrictions appears to rule out any stock enhancement on the KX-Cambridge line. The CT franchise is being split up, and the Cambridge services will form part of two *different* new franchises. First can't cherry-pick just one service to run, it's the whole new franchise or nothing. Stansted/Cambridge/Peterborough/Birmingham will be part of the new Cross-Country franchise (which is losing Reading-Brighton and Manchester-Glasgow). Liverpool/Nottingham/Peterborough/Ely/Norwich will (in addition to the other ex-CT services in the east) become part of a much enlarged new Midland Mainline franchise. Apparently, if 'one' agree to run an additional train from Norwich to Peterborough every two hours, then every other Liverpool-Norwich train will be sent to Cambridge instead. So there's a possibility that Cambridge will end up with trains from 'one', FCC, Sucessor-to-Virgin-XC, and successor-to-MML. Whatever happens, I won't get my direct Nottingham-Stansteds back, though ![]() -- Roland Perry |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Duncan
writes Could be interesting to see how they can enforce these restrictions, since a passenger holding a Travelcard may use the service until Elstree without restriction and passengers joining from Cricklewood travelling North can travel without restriction. http://www.firstcapitalconnect.co.uk...DL_Leaflet.pdf The small print has been fairly carefully worded to restrict travel according to the journey you are making, not just the type of ticket you use. This is presumably intended to cover the case of passengers from the outer zones (say Bedford) buying (a) a cheap day return Bedford-Elstree, and also (b) a London one-day travel-card from Elstree. My understanding is that these could legally be combined on a train which did not stop at Elstree, since one is a zonal ticket and the other is not, and the combined cost would not be much more than the London one day travel-card from Bedford. But the "journey" restrictions might prevent returning from London to Bedford in the peak-period. (I have used examples on the Bedford line, but similar remarks would apply to the other FCC lines affected by the new restrictions). On the other hand if you got a train which actually stopped at Elstree, alighted for a moment, and then boarded the same train again, could you claim to be making two separate journeys, each one not subject to the evening peak restriction? I suspect that the train companies would claim that this was just one journey not two, but how they would prove that you boarded the same train and not another one, I don't know. The matter will probably have to be tested in court. I just hope I'm not the first one to have to test it that way. -- Clive Page |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan Morris wrote:
If I buy three people a discounted travelcard with my Gold Card (and their ticket is marked GOLDC), I wonder if they can travel with me during the restricted evening period? Logic says no, as it's an off peak ticket, but surely if they haven't implicitly mentioned discounted/gold card tickets then they can't enforce the ruling as it is technically a different ticket? Is it not a Gold Card discounted off peak Travelcard? In which case you could ask for a GC discounted peak Travelcard instead, which would be valid. (Just like you can buy Network Card discounted Standard Day Singles as well as Cheap Day Singles, in some cases paying extra for no benefit) Or does using a GC make it a different ticket type and so not a normal Travelcard at all? Theo |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:46:03 +0100, Clive Page wrote:
This is presumably intended to cover the case of passengers from the outer zones (say Bedford) buying (a) a cheap day return Bedford-Elstree, and also (b) a London one-day travel-card from Elstree. My understanding is that these could legally be combined on a train which did not stop at Elstree, since one is a zonal ticket and the other is not, Nope - the rule you are thinking of says that *both* tickets must be zonal. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Chaos likely when they close ticket windows at King's Cross St. Pancras | London Transport | |||
Chaos likely when they close ticket windows at King's Cross St. Pancras | London Transport | |||
King's Cross Northern Ticket Hall - Pictures | London Transport | |||
The lifting of travel / ticket restrictions this Xmas ? | London Transport | |||
FCC evening restrictions - the LTUC, ORR and OFT | London Transport |