Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Adrian" wrote Ummm, lemme guess... No buffets on tube trains? Pullman cars Mayflower and Galatea ran on the Met between 1910 and 1939. Peter |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Arquati wrote:
Neil Williams wrote: Edward Cowling London UK wrote: The stress of not being able to get home will far outweigh the stress of being a bit hot, so get Ken off his latest hobby horse and leave the Underground running. Indeed. I could go on about the new improved London Transport that Ken promised us would be bought with the congestion charge money, but I think he's spent it all on community policing and the damn Olympics. A lot of it's gone on the bus network, to pretty good effect. The trouble is it was a little too successful, in that it did redirect people onto public transport, which means his income dropped. That lead to the price rise and the "make it easier to pay" stuff to encourage a few more people to drive and up the income again! Talking of buses and heatwaves, I noticed on a 14 yesterday that a new air cooling unit had been installed above the stairs on the top deck - and very welcome it was too. Interesting... I've seen a few of the 85s have these too (probably the same fleet from Putney depot mind) and have wondered just how effective the system is. Did you try sitting in different places to test the effect? Cheers Steve M |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edward Cowling London UK wrote:
In message .com, Mizter T writes http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/5143388.stm They'll be putting heat councillors on trains next :-) I`m *not* electing any of those! Better to use trained staff, or, failing that, heat counsellors. ;-) Isn`t British awful in its lack of phonetic pronounciation? |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 22:23:46 +0100, "Peter Masson"
wrote: "Adrian" wrote Ummm, lemme guess... No buffets on tube trains? Pullman cars Mayflower and Galatea ran on the Met between 1910 and 1939. Not quite tube trains in any sense. -- _______ +---------------------------------------------------+ |\\ //| | Charles Ellson: | | \\ // | +---------------------------------------------------+ | | | // \\ | Alba gu brath |//___\\| |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charles Ellson ) gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying : Ummm, lemme guess... No buffets on tube trains? Pullman cars Mayflower and Galatea ran on the Met between 1910 and 1939. Not quite tube trains in any sense. The Met is certainly a tube line. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Jul 2006 02:20:51 -0700, "Paul Weaver"
wrote: Of course, a 500ml bottle of water costs 50p in med countries, £2 in London. Totally off topic, I admit, but a 5 *litre* bottle of water costs 52 cents in any of the major Spanish supermarkets (including on the coast). Even a 2 litre bottle of Gaseosa (a light lemonade) costs 26 cents. I keep going with Isotonics - 23 cents for a 300ml can. -- Bill Hayles http://www.rossrail.com |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Adrian" wrote in message . 244.170... Charles Ellson ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying : Ummm, lemme guess... No buffets on tube trains? Pullman cars Mayflower and Galatea ran on the Met between 1910 and 1939. Not quite tube trains in any sense. The Met is certainly a tube line. It is not. It is entirely surface (or subsurface in some places), but never tube. That line is run entirely by A stock, which is surface stock, and would not fit in tube tunnels. Even if you consider the Metropolitan to include the Circle,H+C,ELL, it still isn't tube. Richard [in SG19] -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Ian Patterson
writes Edward Cowling London UK wrote: In message .com, Mizter T writes http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/5143388.stm They'll be putting heat councillors on trains next :-) I`m *not* electing any of those! Better to use trained staff, or, failing that, heat counsellors. ;-) Isn`t British awful in its lack of phonetic pronounciation? And normally I'm infullable :-) -- Edward Cowling London UK |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Charles Ellson wrote: Many older drinking fountains were designed as "non-contact" devices which would have required a deal of intent for contamination to be caused. Come to think of it, I remember such devices in all the public parks back home. They have all disappeared. Now I know why. I am sure the little (and not so little) so and so's could find ways of contaminating them. The contamination may or may not harm you but it would give them intense pleasure to think you were drinking the water:-( George |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard M Willis ) gurgled happily,
sounding much like they were saying : Ummm, lemme guess... No buffets on tube trains? Pullman cars Mayflower and Galatea ran on the Met between 1910 and 1939. Not quite tube trains in any sense. The Met is certainly a tube line. It is not. It is entirely surface (or subsurface in some places), but never tube. That line is run entirely by A stock, which is surface stock, and would not fit in tube tunnels. Even if you consider the Metropolitan to include the Circle,H+C,ELL, it still isn't tube. sigh Tube in the sense of "London Underground", rather than tube in the sense of the actual engineering behind the line itself. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Future Tube Map | London Transport | |||
Future Tube Map | London Transport | |||
Tube Lines Could Be Sponsored To Reduce Fares | London Transport | |||
Tube Plan To Axe 1,500 Jobs And Close All But 30 Ticket Offices | London Transport | |||
Plans to close Wembley Park tube ticket station | London Transport |