![]() |
Waterloo platforms
Would anyone happen to know from which platform number(s) trains depart
Waterloo for Guildford on a weekday? TIA, Ian -- |
Waterloo platforms
"Ian F." wrote in message ... Would anyone happen to know from which platform number(s) trains depart Waterloo for Guildford on a weekday? I can't say that I've noticed any consistency. It's the middle bit, from about 6 to 14. tim TIA, Ian -- |
Waterloo platforms
"tim" wrote in message
... It's the middle bit, from about 6 to 14. Thanks Tim - noted. Ian |
Waterloo platforms
Ian F. wrote: Would anyone happen to know from which platform number(s) trains depart Waterloo for Guildford on a weekday? When the "new" timetable was introduced in December 2004, the platform allocations were as follows ; 1 - Suburban (Epsom, Chessington, Kingston, Shepperton, Hampton Ct, Guildford) 2 - as 1 3 - as 1 4 - as 1 5 - spare 6 - West of England (Andover, Salisbury, Yeovil, Exeter, Bristol) 7 - as 6 8 - SW Main (Bourmemouth, Poole, Weymouth) 9 - as 8 10 - SW Outer Suburban (Basingstoke, Alton) 11 - as above 12 - SW Main (Southampton & Portsmouth via Eastleigh) 13 - as 12 14 - Portsmouth Direct (Guildford, Haslemere, Petersfield, Portsmouth) 15 - as 14 16 - Windsor/Hounslow via Twickenham 17 - Kingston via Twickenham 18 - Weybridge/Hounslow via Brentford 19 - Ascot & Reading. Whether this has changed much since then, I can't comment, as I'm only in London once or twice per month these days, and obviously, any major disruption will result in the 'plan' being flushed down the nearest toilet. The bit about Platform 5 being 'spare' is a bit strange, as at least the 16h50 Waterloo - Yeovil left from there, and the Portsmouth via Eastleigh train I caught last week left from Platform 9. Hope this is of some use/interest anyway. Matt Southsea |
Waterloo platforms
"M J Forbes" wrote in message
ups.com... Whether this has changed much since then, I can't comment, As it happens, my train was the 5.30pm to Portsmouth Harbour, which left from platform 13. I made it. It was fine. Thanks all. Ian |
Waterloo platforms
M J Forbes wrote: Ian F. wrote: Would anyone happen to know from which platform number(s) trains depart Waterloo for Guildford on a weekday? When the "new" timetable was introduced in December 2004, the platform allocations were as follows ; 1 - Suburban (Epsom, Chessington, Kingston, Shepperton, Hampton Ct, Guildford) 2 - as 1 3 - as 1 4 - as 1 5 - spare 6 - West of England (Andover, Salisbury, Yeovil, Exeter, Bristol) 7 - as 6 8 - SW Main (Bourmemouth, Poole, Weymouth) 9 - as 8 10 - SW Outer Suburban (Basingstoke, Alton) 11 - as above 12 - SW Main (Southampton & Portsmouth via Eastleigh) 13 - as 12 14 - Portsmouth Direct (Guildford, Haslemere, Petersfield, Portsmouth) 15 - as 14 16 - Windsor/Hounslow via Twickenham 17 - Kingston via Twickenham 18 - Weybridge/Hounslow via Brentford 19 - Ascot & Reading. Whether this has changed much since then, I can't comment, as I'm only in London once or twice per month these days, and obviously, any major disruption will result in the 'plan' being flushed down the nearest toilet. The bit about Platform 5 being 'spare' is a bit strange, as at least the 16h50 Waterloo - Yeovil left from there, and the Portsmouth via Eastleigh train I caught last week left from Platform 9. Hope this is of some use/interest anyway. That doesn't seem quite right. I am sure that platform 15 is (and has been for years) used for trains in the Putney direction, not the Portsmouth direction. Has the above got slightly out of line? |
Waterloo platforms
That doesn't seem quite right. I am sure that platform 15 is (and has
been for years) used for trains in the Putney direction, not the Portsmouth direction. Has the above got slightly out of line? I was quoting from an internal document that was issued in the run-up to the new timetable - I never actually bothered to check if it was adhered to! Cheers Matt |
Waterloo platforms
M J Forbes wrote: That doesn't seem quite right. I am sure that platform 15 is (and has been for years) used for trains in the Putney direction, not the Portsmouth direction. Has the above got slightly out of line? I was quoting from an internal document that was issued in the run-up to the new timetable - I never actually bothered to check if it was adhered to! Since this I've checked a couple of times in passing, and 15 has not been used for anything. But last time I came into it it was from the "Windsor lines". This in conjunction with pre-timetable-change memories of catching Reading trains there made me sure that it was used for trains in that direction. Platform 14 has been used for Alton and Basingstoke services today (which I think is normal). I suppose I could stand there till a train leaves from platform 15, but that might seem obsessive. Somebody working for SWT probably knows. |
Waterloo platforms
"MIG" wrote I suppose I could stand there till a train leaves from platform 15, but that might seem obsessive. Somebody working for SWT probably knows. An easier way is to ask http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe for trains from Waterloo to Clapham Junction. The next one from platform 15 comes up as the 05.05 to Reading, headcode 1C05. |
Waterloo platforms
John Salmon wrote: "MIG" wrote I suppose I could stand there till a train leaves from platform 15, but that might seem obsessive. Somebody working for SWT probably knows. An easier way is to ask http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe for trains from Waterloo to Clapham Junction. The next one from platform 15 comes up as the 05.05 to Reading, headcode 1C05. (Mumble mumble old fashioned ways ...) But I'm only getting a timeout from this link at various times today. |
Waterloo platforms
John Salmon wrote: An easier way is to ask http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe ....but suffers from the slight downside of not actually responding. -- gordon |
Waterloo platforms
|
Waterloo platforms
"Jack Taylor" wrote in message ... wrote: John Salmon wrote: An easier way is to ask http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe ...but suffers from the slight downside of not actually responding. That's the danger of quoting IP numbers instead of URLs. The IP numbers are not the problem, you need to use http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe?newQuery=newQuery and then it will work. Peter Smyth |
Waterloo platforms
Peter Smyth wrote: "Jack Taylor" wrote in message ... wrote: John Salmon wrote: An easier way is to ask http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe ...but suffers from the slight downside of not actually responding. That's the danger of quoting IP numbers instead of URLs. The IP numbers are not the problem, you need to use http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe?newQuery=newQuery and then it will work. Peter Smyth OK; got it now. But how do I tell it that I don't care where I go as long as I start from platform 15 at Waterloo? (I am getting ideas about a new series of one-off TV plays involving journeys from platform 15, or perhaps a documentary about despatchers and barrier staff, on the lines of Airport. "Platform 15" hmm.) |
Waterloo platforms
Peter Smyth wrote:
The IP numbers are not the problem, you need to use http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe?newQuery=newQuery and then it will work. Unless the application is ported to a server with a different IP address! The point of a URL is that it does any redirection for you (provided that it's been set up and is maintained correctly!). |
Waterloo platforms
"Jack Taylor" wrote in message ... Peter Smyth wrote: The IP numbers are not the problem, you need to use http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe?newQuery=newQuery and then it will work. Unless the application is ported to a server with a different IP address! The point of a URL is that it does any redirection for you (provided that it's been set up and is maintained correctly!). It doesn't seem to have another address though. If you go the the main Traveline page at http://www.traveline.org.uk/index.htm and click on the North East region, that is the address it takes you to. Peter Smyth |
Waterloo platforms
Peter Smyth wrote: "Jack Taylor" wrote in message ... wrote: John Salmon wrote: An easier way is to ask http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe ...but suffers from the slight downside of not actually responding. That's the danger of quoting IP numbers instead of URLs. The IP numbers are not the problem, you need to use http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe?newQuery=newQuery and then it will work. Also it gives the booked departure rather than (understandably) the actual platform which may be or (often) may not be the actual platform on any given day. -- gordon |
Waterloo platforms
Peter Smyth wrote: "Jack Taylor" wrote in message ... wrote: John Salmon wrote: An easier way is to ask http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe ...but suffers from the slight downside of not actually responding. That's the danger of quoting IP numbers instead of URLs. The IP numbers are not the problem, you need to use http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe?newQuery=newQuery and then it will work. Also it gives the "booked" departure platform i.e. the notionally correct platform all other things being equal. However as this is the UK the need for consistency of platforming even when things are running fairly well appears to be subordinate to a host of other considerations. What these are I've no idea. -- gordon |
Waterloo platforms
"Colin Rosenstiel" wrote in message ... In article , (Peter Smyth) wrote: "Jack Taylor" wrote in message ... wrote: John Salmon wrote: An easier way is to ask http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe ...but suffers from the slight downside of not actually responding. That's the danger of quoting IP numbers instead of URLs. The IP numbers are not the problem, you need to use http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe?newQuery=newQuery and then it will work. What's traveline north east and cumbria got to do with Waterloo? Despite the name, all of the regional traveline sites have rail data for the whole country. However the North East site is the only one to show the booked platform numbers as for some reason it was decided that it would be a sensible use of public money to have a completely different interface to the journey planner for each region. Peter Smyth |
Waterloo platforms
In article ,
(Peter Smyth) wrote: "Colin Rosenstiel" wrote in message ... In article , (Peter Smyth) wrote: "Jack Taylor" wrote in message ... The IP numbers are not the problem, you need to use http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe?newQuery=newQuery and then it will work. What's traveline north east and cumbria got to do with Waterloo? Despite the name, all of the regional traveline sites have rail data for the whole country. However the North East site is the only one to show the booked platform numbers as for some reason it was decided that it would be a sensible use of public money to have a completely different interface to the journey planner for each region. Ah! I see now. However, it seems I can go from Waterloo platform 4 to Putney. It takes 1 hour and 2 minutes though. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
Waterloo platforms
Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article , (Peter Smyth) wrote: "Colin Rosenstiel" wrote in message ... In article , (Peter Smyth) wrote: "Jack Taylor" wrote in message ... The IP numbers are not the problem, you need to use http://217.23.229.206/jpclient.exe?newQuery=newQuery and then it will work. What's traveline north east and cumbria got to do with Waterloo? Despite the name, all of the regional traveline sites have rail data for the whole country. However the North East site is the only one to show the booked platform numbers as for some reason it was decided that it would be a sensible use of public money to have a completely different interface to the journey planner for each region. Ah! I see now. However, it seems I can go from Waterloo platform 4 to Putney. It takes 1 hour and 2 minutes though. Just to add some new data, regarding the apparent intention of using platform 15 in the Portsmouth direction, in recent days I have seen platform 15 used for 0837 to Reading via Richmond 1752 to Weybridge via Brentford 0933 Kingston loop via Richmond 1822 to Weybridge via Brentford |
Waterloo platforms
|
Waterloo platforms
Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article .com, (MIG) wrote: 0933 Kingston loop via Richmond I thought that route was called the Kingston Roundabout. Has it changed? I don't know; I've never been any good at knowing the in-phrases and tend to make up my own. Kingston Roundabout sounds a bit like a junction on the A3. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk