Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been informed that it is being, or has been, dismantled at Theobalds
Grove and will shortly be reinstated at or near its original location between the Strand and Fleet Street. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , John Rowland
writes I have been informed that it is being, or has been, dismantled at Theobalds Grove and will shortly be reinstated at or near its original location between the Strand and Fleet Street. Er ,if they put it back *at* its original location that could have a - to say the least - "dramatic" effect on traffic between the Strand and Fleet Street. "Nearby" I can believe, "at" I suspect is unlikely. This project has been talked about for yeas, decades, even. What's your source, John? (Not that I'm doubting you, I hasten to add!) -- Ian Jelf, MITG, Birmingham, UK Registered "Blue Badge" Tourist Guide for London & the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been informed that it is being, or has been, dismantled at Theobalds
Grove and will shortly be reinstated at or near its original location between the Strand and Fleet Street. My understanding is that it will be re-erected in or near Paternoster Square, to the North West of the front entrance of St. Paul's Cathedral. It can't go back in Fleet Street (sadly, in my view) because the traffic wouldn't get through. It was also offered to Middle and Inner Temple, to erect at the South end of Middle Temple Lane, but we turned it down (I was a member of the Middle Temple Estates Committee at the time) because it would have cost us over £1 million to erect it there, and in any event it would have detracted from the attractive gothic Temple Gardens building which straddles Middle Temple Lane thereabouts. Marc. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not at all surprised Temple Bar is a bit fragile as its been sitting
totally neglected in those woods for ... oh, it had been there ages when I was a kid round there 50 years ago! Good to see that it's going back into central London; it was wasted in those woods. *Keith* |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith Marshall" wrote in message
. .. the Roman Ermine Street runs right by Temple Bar Ermine Street seems to be still in use from London Bridge to the Tottenham / Edmonton boundary, but abandoned from there to Maidens Bridge in Bulls Cross. I wonder why, and when it happened - was it in connection with the New River construction? Things are even worse now, so the prospect of it in the middle of Paternoster Square all spruced up and giving the place a bit of character can only be welcomed. I'm sure the phrases "Paternoster Square" and "a bit of character" in the same sentence will sound okay in time! I don't understand why they couldn't put it back between the Strand and Fleet Street. There were buildings demolished there recently, and I assumed that they were making room for it, but it would appear not. Failing that, I think they should have put it somewhere else on the boundary between the City of London and the City of Westminster, perhaps on the Embankment. Putting it in Paternoster Square seems pointless, because it won't be the gate between anything, and it will be outclassed by Wren's better known work anyway. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
"Keith Marshall" wrote in message . .. the Roman Ermine Street runs right by Temple Bar Ermine Street seems to be still in use from London Bridge to the Tottenham / Edmonton boundary, but abandoned from there to Maidens Bridge in Bulls Cross. I wonder why, and when it happened - was it in connection with the New River construction? Things are even worse now, so the prospect of it in the middle of Paternoster Square all spruced up and giving the place a bit of character can only be welcomed. I'm sure the phrases "Paternoster Square" and "a bit of character" in the same sentence will sound okay in time! I don't understand why they couldn't put it back between the Strand and Fleet Street. There were buildings demolished there recently, and I assumed that they were making room for it, but it would appear not. Failing that, I think they should have put it somewhere else on the boundary between the City of London and the City of Westminster, perhaps on the Embankment. Putting it in Paternoster Square seems pointless, because it won't be the gate between anything, and it will be outclassed by Wren's better known work anyway. Why not as a gate into the CC area? It'd make a significant contribution to free movement of traffic! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cast_Iron" wrote in message
... John Rowland wrote: Why not as a gate into the CC area? Hehe, and make 200 replicas for all of the cordon points. It'd make a significant contribution to free movement of traffic! How restrictive is it anyway? Could 2 Routemasters pass each other beneath it? 2 bendibi? -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
I'm sure the phrases "Paternoster Square" and "a bit of character" in the same sentence will sound okay in time! I don't understand why they couldn't put it back between the Strand and Fleet Street. There were buildings demolished there recently, and I assumed that they were making room for it, but it would appear not. Failing that, I think they should have put it somewhere else on the boundary between the City of London and the City of Westminster, perhaps on the Embankment. Putting it in Paternoster Square seems pointless, because it won't be the gate between anything, and it will be outclassed by Wren's better known work anyway. Remember - this is the new Paternoster Square, which is much more sympathic towards it's far more grand neighbour St Pauls than that 60's nightmare. A piccie of where Temple Bar is being moved to is he http://pic5.picturetrail.com/VOL85/9...1/29012091.jpg Behind it, you can see the north tower of St Pauls on the West Front (I'm sure it's probably got some specific name but I don't know it). The red brick building in on the left is the original chapterhouse (I think), the cream coloured building on the right is a new building that's part of the new Paternoster Sq development. So, it's not just being stuck in the middle of the square - it will be used as the main gateway to and from it (the square itself also has a big column on the centre with some golden fire bolt thing on the top). |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Potters Bar Inquest verdict - BBC News | London Transport | |||
Driving the Journey Planner from a browser address bar | London Transport | |||
Help! Boat with a bar needed ... 5 people. | London Transport | |||
Temple & Cannon St weekend opening | London Transport | |||
Temple Bar | London Transport |