![]() |
London Overground
|
London Overground
Paul Corfield wrote:
On 5 Sep 2006 08:57:44 -0700, "John B" wrote: * lifts appearing at Euston Square, Paddington (District), Highbury & Islington, Tottenham Hale, Waterloo (Northern) and Vauxhall. Tottenham Hale is already step free - the lift has been in service for years. As the Victoria Line Voice Woman now reminds us every bloody time I go through the station. I don't know about anyone else, but her tone of voice to me on that recording sounds awfully patronising, almost "Listen, disabled people, I know some of you aren't very bright, so I'm going to say this very slowly with a sense of wonder in my voice." Sorry, it just annoys me :-) |
London Overground
Paul Speller wrote: On 5 Sep 2006 11:42:20 -0700, Bob wrote: Nice to see the clever integration of the blue disabled access symbol on to the map. Becks foresighted modular flexibility triumphs again. Except that the use of the disabled symbol actually removes one of Beck's original innovations and makes the map provide less information than it used to (discounting the obvious extra information about step-free access!). Until recently you could immediately see which stations were interchanges and which weren't I assumed the original post was ironic, but maybe not. |
London Overground
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 10:46:40 +0100, Dave Arquati wrote:
Listening to some commentary on the radio last night it was stated that running trains from Dalston Junc to Highbury is going to cost £400M. Bearing in mind that all that needs to be done on the face of it is reinstate a few hundred yards of track what is going to cost half a Wembley Stadium of half a Dome. Not what I heard - the following parliamentary debate suggests £200m for the northern part of (what was) Phase 2 - Dalston Junction to Caledonian Road & Barnsbury. That includes turnback facilities at CR&B, possibly extra tracks somewhere between there and Dalston, the reinstated curve at Dalston, a replacement junction on the NLL (obviously the old one isn't there any more) and probably some resignalling. Then again, reinstating a significantly longer section of track in south London and building a new station at Surrey Canal Road seems to cost much less (£75m), so I'm not sure what difference is for. Is the formation at Dalston still in Network Rail's hands? Perhaps not: the property listing section of the British Railways Board (Residuary) website (see http://www.brb.gov.uk/property) suggests that the west curve at Dalston may have been sold off. http://www.brb.gov.uk/property/prope...ounty=l&page=3 "Dalston Junction: Western Junction closed line: Sold" |
London Overground
|
London Overground
Dave Arquati wrote:
Camden Town to Camden Road (an additional exit from the northern ends of the platforms at Camden Town to a second ticket office closer to Camden Road was floated as a potential congestion-relief measure). Floated by whom? When I phoned up the woman in charge of the public consultation for the rebuiding of Camden Town, she clearly regarded improving interchange with the NLL to be a bizarre and inexplicable aim. |
London Overground
TheOneKEA wrote:
I am still of the opinion that York Road Piccadilly should be reopened as soon as possible - the regen frenzy of the Kings Cross Railway Lands will eventually make it imperative to fill the hole. The best part is that the station has lift shafts that descend all the way to platform level, like the ones at Earl's Court and Caledonian Road. As a result, all that would be needed is the construction of escalators. I don't see why escalators would be necessary, when Russell Square, Goodge Street and Lancaster Gate get by without any. |
London Overground
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/h...06_tubemap.pdf
That map throws up a few extra bits of information by itself, such as: * lifts appearing at Euston Square I haven't used Euston Square since they rebuilt it, but surely the new station has either lifts or ramps! |
London Overground
John Rowland wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote: Camden Town to Camden Road (an additional exit from the northern ends of the platforms at Camden Town to a second ticket office closer to Camden Road was floated as a potential congestion-relief measure). Floated by whom? When I phoned up the woman in charge of the public consultation for the rebuiding of Camden Town, she clearly regarded improving interchange with the NLL to be a bizarre and inexplicable aim. Arup, I think. They supplied an alternative proposal to LU's (on behalf of a campaign group organised by the markets) for the public inquiry, which was intended to reduce the impact of the expanded station on the surrounding markets and shops. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
London Overground
John Rowland wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/h...06_tubemap.pdf That map throws up a few extra bits of information by itself, such as: * lifts appearing at Euston Square I haven't used Euston Square since they rebuilt it, but surely the new station has either lifts or ramps! Well, the entrance from the street under the new Wellcome building, might have a lift (entrance not open yet), but the building work hasn't affected the stairs from the ticket office down to the platforms. This 'rebuild' is actually just a replacement of the entrance on the south side of Euston Road, due to the Wellcome building works. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk