Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had planned to pop up to London to see the fireworks on the Thames
tonight, and just discovered the brilliant planning which has shut down the main line over the river and reduced my local service to hourly. Well done Network Rail! MaxB --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0637-2, 15/09/2006 Tested on: 17/09/2006 18:56:43 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() MaxB wrote: I had planned to pop up to London to see the fireworks on the Thames tonight, and just discovered the brilliant planning which has shut down the main line over the river and reduced my local service to hourly. Well done Network Rail! Yeah, but they messed up and left loads of other routes to the Thames open (I don't know about your local service). Bear in mind that nearly all of the festival was on the south of the river anyway. I do get annoyed by the timing of some closures, but in this case I don't think that the closure of Charing Cross had any significant effect on the accessibility of the festival. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:56:32 +0100, "MaxB"
wrote: I had planned to pop up to London to see the fireworks on the Thames tonight, and just discovered the brilliant planning which has shut down the main line over the river and reduced my local service to hourly. Well done Network Rail! MaxB They can't plan for every event. Whatever weekend they pick to do the engineering work, there's always going to be some fairly large gathering of people somewhere in the capital. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "MIG" wrote in message ups.com... MaxB wrote: I had planned to pop up to London to see the fireworks on the Thames tonight, and just discovered the brilliant planning which has shut down the main line over the river and reduced my local service to hourly. Well done Network Rail! Yeah, but they messed up and left loads of other routes to the Thames open (I don't know about your local service). Bear in mind that nearly all of the festival was on the south of the river anyway. I do get annoyed by the timing of some closures, but in this case I don't think that the closure of Charing Cross had any significant effect on the accessibility of the festival. Charing Cross to London Bridge IS south of the river (where lots of real people live too you know). MaxB --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0637-2, 15/09/2006 Tested on: 18/09/2006 07:45:57 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Frimberley" wrote in message ... On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:56:32 +0100, "MaxB" wrote: I had planned to pop up to London to see the fireworks on the Thames tonight, and just discovered the brilliant planning which has shut down the main line over the river and reduced my local service to hourly. Well done Network Rail! MaxB They can't plan for every event. Whatever weekend they pick to do the engineering work, there's always going to be some fairly large gathering of people somewhere in the capital. Having had to plan engineering works in the past, one of the first things you do is to check what else is happening! And it's a damn site easier these days with the internet. And this wasn't just Thames festival day, it was also Open House weekend plus some ITV event - not just your average weekend and certainly not the day to close down the most conveniently situated London terminal. This was just sloppy and incompetent. MaxB --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0637-2, 15/09/2006 Tested on: 18/09/2006 07:45:57 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MaxB wrote:
"Peter Frimberley" wrote in message ... On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:56:32 +0100, "MaxB" wrote: I had planned to pop up to London to see the fireworks on the Thames tonight, and just discovered the brilliant planning which has shut down the main line over the river and reduced my local service to hourly. Well done Network Rail! MaxB They can't plan for every event. Whatever weekend they pick to do the engineering work, there's always going to be some fairly large gathering of people somewhere in the capital. Having had to plan engineering works in the past, one of the first things you do is to check what else is happening! And it's a damn site easier these days with the internet. And this wasn't just Thames festival day, it was also Open House weekend plus some ITV event - not just your average weekend and certainly not the day to close down the most conveniently situated London terminal. Well, it might be the most convenient for you, but it's useless for me. Depends where you live, surely? Anyway, the tube was still running, so there was no lack of transport connections across the river in central London. What's your local station that had it's service reduced to hourly yesterday? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard J." wrote in message
.uk... MaxB wrote: "Peter Frimberley" wrote in message ... On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:56:32 +0100, "MaxB" wrote: I had planned to pop up to London to see the fireworks on the Thames tonight, and just discovered the brilliant planning which has shut down the main line over the river and reduced my local service to hourly. Well done Network Rail! MaxB They can't plan for every event. Whatever weekend they pick to do the engineering work, there's always going to be some fairly large gathering of people somewhere in the capital. Having had to plan engineering works in the past, one of the first things you do is to check what else is happening! And it's a damn site easier these days with the internet. And this wasn't just Thames festival day, it was also Open House weekend plus some ITV event - not just your average weekend and certainly not the day to close down the most conveniently situated London terminal. Well, it might be the most convenient for you, but it's useless for me. Depends where you live, surely? Anyway, the tube was still running, so there was no lack of transport connections across the river in central London. What's your local station that had it's service reduced to hourly yesterday? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) Elmstead Woods - and Charing Cross is still the best situated main line station for central London, not terminating somewhere in the suburbs as so many do! MaxB --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0637-2, 15/09/2006 Tested on: 18/09/2006 10:13:09 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() MaxB wrote: "MIG" wrote in message ups.com... MaxB wrote: I had planned to pop up to London to see the fireworks on the Thames tonight, and just discovered the brilliant planning which has shut down the main line over the river and reduced my local service to hourly. Well done Network Rail! Yeah, but they messed up and left loads of other routes to the Thames open (I don't know about your local service). Bear in mind that nearly all of the festival was on the south of the river anyway. I do get annoyed by the timing of some closures, but in this case I don't think that the closure of Charing Cross had any significant effect on the accessibility of the festival. Charing Cross to London Bridge IS south of the river (where lots of real people live too you know). You did specifically mention "main line over the river". It's only Charing Cross itself you couldn't get to, and that's the other side of the river. London Bridge was the best station for City Hall, Hays Galleria etc. Jubilee gets you from there to Southwark, Waterloo, Westminster. Southwark and Waterloo give a better range of the South Bank than Waterloo East, slightly making up for having to change. I have no idea why there would be a reduced service to Elmstead Woods related to the closure of Charing Cross. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MaxB" wrote:
Well, it might be the most convenient for you, but it's useless for me. Depends where you live, surely? Anyway, the tube was still running, so there was no lack of transport connections across the river in central London. What's your local station that had it's service reduced to hourly yesterday? Elmstead Woods - and Charing Cross is still the best situated main line station for central London, not terminating somewhere in the suburbs as so many do! Terminating somewhere in the suburbs? Sorry, but you're talking ****e. Granted, Charing Cross is the closest mainline terminus to Central London, being pretty much smack bang in the middle of the West End and all that, but the other terminii are hardly out in the suburbs. They're all within around 10 minutes of somewhere right in the centre - Kings Cross, Euston, Marylebone, Paddington, Victoria, Waterloo, Blackfriars, Cannon Street, Fenchurch Street, Liverpool Street and Moorgate all fit that description. Paddington and Marylebone are vaguely far out compared to the rest, but still nothing close to anything matching the description of "somewhere in the suburbs". And yes, for a night out in the West End, Charing Cross is the best placed mainline station, but that's only any good if you live the South-East of the centre (i.e. on a line that goes in to Charing Cross). For people coming in from the West, East, North, North-West, South and South-West, train to another London Terminus and then the tube is a much better bet. Well, with the possible exception of the South, where a change at London Bridge will get you straight to Charing Cross. I can't see what you're moaning about though - surely you could have just changed at London Bridge for Blackfriars and got you just as close as Charing Cross would have done? -- "For want of the price of tea and a slice, the old man died." |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:25:05 GMT, AstraVanMan wrote:
I can't see what you're moaning about though - surely you could have just changed at London Bridge for Blackfriars and got you just as close as Charing Cross would have done? Charing Cross trains were being diverted to Cannon Street. Cannon Street Tube station was kept open all weekend, and tickets to London Terminals were being accepted on the Tube between Cannon Street and Embankment. For a one-off leisure journey, the inconvenience seems minor to say the least. Compared to what people usually have to put up with when their desired route is closed for engineering works, it barely seems worth a mention. Having the service to your local station reduced to hourly is, I admit, far more of an inconvenience. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why were Charing Cross-bound trains using London Bridge platform 4? | London Transport | |||
Announcements at Charing Cross | London Transport | |||
DLR to Charing Cross? | London Transport | |||
disused esclators at LU Charing Cross | London Transport | |||
Jubilee Line at Charing Cross | London Transport |