Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Are they taught to deliberately block both lanes when they stop at traffic lights, so that no-one else can overtake them? I followed one tonight, and he did it at every junction. I don't really understand this mentality - as the driver of a vehicle which is very slow up hills, I go to a fair effort to make sure that other vehicles do have opportunities to overtake me, putting my left indicator on whenever there is a motor bike behind me and so on, partly because when you drive as much as I do, little tasks like that help keep driving enjoyable. Maybe bus drivers are frustrated Formula One drivers, or maybe it's a Livingstone policy to make buses more competitive with other forms of transport by making sure buses slow everything else down to bus speed. Incidentally, a bus full of passengers tried to do this a few months ago, but he accidentally left *just* enough room on the inside for me to sneak up next to him, so I did that, being careful to check that the passenger door(s) were not open. He looked very annoyed when I appeared next to his passenger door. So, although the lights were still red, he pulled forward about 6 metres over the stop line and swung to the left, in order to make sure I couldn't beat him away from the lights. As I overtook him at the next bus stop, he shouted criticism about my driving! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whinging Courier wrote:
Are they taught to deliberately block both lanes when they stop at traffic lights, so that no-one else can overtake them? As a driver of a HGV I can say yes. If you don't block both lanes, some clever **** a Beemer or Audi or one of those green-disc-mini-cab-****s will just pour through the gap squeezing us out with nowhere to go. I don't see why this is a problem for you. Why not just go /after/ the Beemer, Audi or minicab has set off - you won't lose much time, as it'll accelerate faster than you anyway...? Or is it just an ego thing: "I arrived at these lights first, and no bugger is going to go before me, no matter how fast their car is..."? -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John B ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying : Are they taught to deliberately block both lanes when they stop at traffic lights, so that no-one else can overtake them? As a driver of a HGV I can say yes. If you don't block both lanes, some clever **** a Beemer or Audi or one of those green-disc-mini-cab-****s will just pour through the gap squeezing us out with nowhere to go. I don't see why this is a problem for you. Why not just go /after/ the Beemer, Audi or minicab has set off - you won't lose much time, as it'll accelerate faster than you anyway...? Because there'll be another one/two/seventeen behind it - meaning the bus can never move off. Why can't the car wait for the bus/HGV? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John B" wrote in message
ups.com... Whinging Courier wrote: Are they taught to deliberately block both lanes when they stop at traffic lights, so that no-one else can overtake them? As a driver of a HGV I can say yes. If you don't block both lanes, some clever **** a Beemer or Audi or one of those green-disc-mini-cab-****s will just pour through the gap squeezing us out with nowhere to go. I don't see why this is a problem for you. Why not just go /after/ the Beemer, Audi or minicab has set off - you won't lose much time, as it'll accelerate faster than you anyway...? Or is it just an ego thing: "I arrived at these lights first, and no bugger is going to go before me, no matter how fast their car is..."? Because making a bus full of people wait for one asshat in a car is not very fair, is it? ![]() -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Whinging Courier wrote: In uk.transport.london, John Rowland belched forth and ejected the following: Are they taught to deliberately block both lanes when they stop at traffic lights, so that no-one else can overtake them? As a driver of a HGV I can say yes. If you don't block both lanes, some clever c*** a Beemer or Audi or one of those green-disc-mini-cab-****s will just pour through the gap squeezing us out with nowhere to go. No they will probably move off ahead of you and you will merge in naturally, assuming it reduces back to one lane once you have crossed the junction. If most people drove courteously, there'd be no need but this is London, And it's because you do this kind of thing that they are not courteous to you. Same with buses. I won't let buses out of bus-stops because I know they are going to behave like that in front of me. Either blocking both lanes at traffic lights or not going into their bus layby at the next bus-stop. Of course, when I'm on my bike it's quite useful that the bus occupies both lanes as I can comfortably find a way through to the front, whereas with a bus and a car, or even two cars, it might be more difficult. See above; it's not the driver's mentality so much as the size of his vehicle and other people not wanting to let them out. Not the size of the vehicle, it's knowing they are going to hold you up later. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In uk.transport.london, Adrian belched forth and ejected the following:
Why can't the car wait for the bus/HGV? Because it might cost them at least five yards! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In uk.transport.london, Earl Purple belched forth and ejected the
following: Whinging Courier wrote: In uk.transport.london, John Rowland belched forth and ejected the following: Are they taught to deliberately block both lanes when they stop at traffic lights, so that no-one else can overtake them? As a driver of a HGV I can say yes. If you don't block both lanes, some clever c*** a Beemer or Audi or one of those green-disc-mini-cab-****s will just pour through the gap squeezing us out with nowhere to go. No they will probably move off ahead of you and you will merge in naturally, assuming it reduces back to one lane once you have crossed the junction. If most people drove courteously, there'd be no need but this is London, And it's because you do this kind of thing that they are not courteous to you. Same with buses. I'm sorry but you've got no idea what you're banging on about. Cars have to get there because they feel it's their right (IMHO, of course), lorries need to get in the way because car drivers won't let the ****ers out. Have you ever driven a lorry or bus round London? I promise you'll feel differently once you've got a few miles under your belt. I won't let buses out of bus-stops because I know they are going to behave like that in front of me. Either blocking both lanes at traffic lights or not going into their bus layby at the next bus-stop. Of course, when I'm on my bike it's quite useful that the bus occupies both lanes as I can comfortably find a way through to the front, whereas with a bus and a car, or even two cars, it might be more difficult. That's very convenient but don't forget motor/bicyclists are not easy to see in anything larger than a transit and it's a laugh when the ****s try and blame me because they overtook on the inside and they happened to be in my blindspot. See above; it's not the driver's mentality so much as the size of his vehicle and other people not wanting to let them out. Not the size of the vehicle, it's knowing they are going to hold you up later. So get a faster car and better reactions. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Whinging Courier wrote: Cars have to get there because they feel it's their right (IMHO, of course), lorries need to get in the way because car drivers won't let the ****ers out. Have you ever driven a lorry or bus round London? I promise you'll feel differently once you've got a few miles under your belt. I've never driven a bus or a lorry. I've ridden in a bus many times. I've known occasions where the bus took a while to get out of the bus stop. Cars might be willing to let them out if they could be certain the bus would let them pass them at the next one. I once let one out and at the next stop the bus didn't use its layby when it could easily have done so. Since then I have never let a bus out if I can help it. Lorries are generally not a "must overtake" vehicle (unlike a bus) because they tend to go at a reasonably normal speed and don't stop at bus stops. The only lorries you really don't want to be stuck behind are the garbage collectors, who also deliberately block. In fact they do their best to block out cyclists too. I know the bin-men don't want to get run over by the passing cars while they are collecting, but they do seem to pick the worst times to do their collections. That's very convenient but don't forget motor/bicyclists are not easy to see in anything larger than a transit and it's a laugh when the ****s try and blame me because they overtook on the inside and they happened to be in my blindspot. Only an idiot cyclist overtakes a lorry on the left side unless it is clear they will get to the other end before the lorry moves off. Of course, overtaking on the right isn't guaranteed to be safe either (if the lorry is turning left), as the lorry may swing out to make the turn. Once at Marble Arch there was a lorry turning and I on my bike was keeping a good distance and refusing to pass until it had completed its manouevure. Car drivers nearby didn't fully understand what I was doing. So get a faster car and better reactions. One of my cars is very fast. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Whinging Courier wrote: Cars have to get there because they feel it's their right (IMHO, of course), lorries need to get in the way because car drivers won't let the ****ers out. Have you ever driven a lorry or bus round London? I promise you'll feel differently once you've got a few miles under your belt. I've never driven a bus or a lorry. I've ridden in a bus many times. I've known occasions where the bus took a while to get out of the bus stop. Cars might be willing to let them out if they could be certain the bus would let them pass them at the next one. I once let one out and at the next stop the bus didn't use its layby when it could easily have done so. Since then I have never let a bus out if I can help it. Lorries are generally not a "must overtake" vehicle (unlike a bus) because they tend to go at a reasonably normal speed and don't stop at bus stops. The only lorries you really don't want to be stuck behind are the garbage collectors, who also deliberately block. In fact they do their best to block out cyclists too. I know the bin-men don't want to get run over by the passing cars while they are collecting, but they do seem to pick the worst times to do their collections. That's very convenient but don't forget motor/bicyclists are not easy to see in anything larger than a transit and it's a laugh when the ****s try and blame me because they overtook on the inside and they happened to be in my blindspot. Only an idiot cyclist overtakes a lorry on the left side unless it is clear they will get to the other end before the lorry moves off. Of course, overtaking on the right isn't guaranteed to be safe either (if the lorry is turning left), as the lorry may swing out to make the turn. Once at Marble Arch there was a lorry turning and I on my bike was keeping a good distance and refusing to pass until it had completed its manouevure. Car drivers nearby didn't fully understand what I was doing. So get a faster car and better reactions. One of my cars is very fast. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:42:20 +0100, "John Rowland"
wrote: Are they taught to deliberately block both lanes when they stop at traffic lights, so that no-one else can overtake them? I followed one tonight, and he did it at every junction. I don't really understand this mentality - as the driver of a vehicle which is very slow up hills, I go to a fair effort to make sure that other vehicles do have opportunities to overtake me, putting my left indicator on whenever there is a motor bike behind me and so on, partly because when you drive as much as I do, little tasks like that help keep driving enjoyable. Maybe bus drivers are frustrated Formula One drivers, or maybe it's a Livingstone policy to make buses more competitive with other forms of transport by making sure buses slow everything else down to bus speed. Incidentally, a bus full of passengers tried to do this a few months ago, but he accidentally left *just* enough room on the inside for me to sneak up next to him, so I did that, being careful to check that the passenger door(s) were not open. He looked very annoyed when I appeared next to his passenger door. So, although the lights were still red, he pulled forward about 6 metres over the stop line and swung to the left, in order to make sure I couldn't beat him away from the lights. As I overtook him at the next bus stop, he shouted criticism about my driving! Yes, they do this deliberately *because* of the idiot car drivers that try to perform unsafe or selfish manoeuvres at traffic lights. Cyclists have been forced to adopt a similar stance, gone are the days when the cyclist could adopt a path approx 1 foot from the pavement and know that cars would give him a decent berth; so they have to force the issue and ride in the middle of the lane at any tight spots, to prevent any morons trying to cut through where it is too narrow. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
To All Bus Drivers | London Transport | |||
More troublesome bus drivers | London Transport | |||
Central London Bus Ticket Machines: drivers ability to know if they are in order ? | London Transport | |||
Bus Conductors and Drivers (again). | London Transport | |||
Bus Conductors and Drivers (again). | London Transport |