Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Boltar" wrote in message ups.com... John Rowland wrote: Under TL2000, all of the trains which currently terminate at City Thameslink will be extended to Finsbury Park and further. How, will they switch onto the GN lines at KX? Are the 319s cleared for those lines? The Thameslink project includes a connection to the Great Northern lines from north of St Pancras Midland Road, with trains running from Southern and Sotheastern lines to the existing Thameslink line to Bedford and Great Northern lines to Peterborough and Kings Lynn (the Great Northern part of the former WAGN franchise is now operated by FCC, along with the former Thameslink franchise). The 'new' Thameslink will have a whole new fleet of trains. It is likely that the existing Southeastern City Thameslink trains will not be the ones projected through via Kentish Town or Finsbury Park, rather trains from Ashford and Dartford via London Bridge. The Thameslink proposals do involve an extension of the overhead electrification. I am not sure why, though it may be so that it takes place somewhere where it won't be too difficult to reverse a train or put it into a siding (Smithfield?) if the switchover doesn't work. It seems that the original proposal to extend it to Blackfriars has been cut back Peter |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message . com, at
06:37:46 on Thu, 23 Nov 2006, Boltar remarked: Under TL2000, all of the trains which currently terminate at City Thameslink will be extended to Finsbury Park and further. How, will they switch onto the GN lines at KX? Are the 319s cleared for those lines? TL3K will probably have to have a new set of trains anyway. The increase in throughput can't be coped with by the current fleet. -- Roland Perry |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
Boltar wrote: Anyone know why the Southeastern DC only class 465s sometimes continue on to City Thameslink in the rush hour but not all the way to Farringdon? Wouldn't it be more useful to commuters if they terminated at the latter to hook up with the tube? Or would it operationally be too awkward to have them reverse there? The only d.c. train ever to get as far as Farringdon (AFAIK) was a test train run one Sunday as part of the commissioning of the Snow Hill route. I have slides of the event. It must have thrown up some snags - the actual start of through running was about 3 months later. J |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jock Mackirdy wrote: The only d.c. train ever to get as far as Farringdon (AFAIK) was a test train run one Sunday as part of the commissioning of the Snow Hill route. I have slides of the event. It must have thrown up some snags - the actual start of through running was about 3 months later. You posted in 2000 that it was a 455 ISTR. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Boltar wrote: Anyone know why the Southeastern DC only class 465s sometimes continue on to City Thameslink in the rush hour but not all the way to Farringdon? SET continues to run a handful of trains to City to meet legal obligations of service replacement after closure of Holborn Viaduct. Thats the only reason they run trains there at all. 465s are not and never have been cleared to Farringdon. There is almost certainly a signals and telecomms interference issue with LUL lines that is probably too expensive to resolve for the gain. The only reason useful period to run such trains through for connections would be in the peaks - and turning back trains in Farringdon would gobble up too much (of the present day) capcity that is better used by through trains. (Of course ... 365s might have fitted the bill ... ) In answer to another comment, DC *have* run to Farringdon - with 455s. In the very early days of the through route, 455s had to early morning workings to Farringdon and back - one was a Sanderstead train, the other was also from a plce being with S but I can't recall with one. I've done one of those 455 moves myself - so I know it took place. -- Nick |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() contrex wrote: Jock Mackirdy wrote: The only d.c. train ever to get as far as Farringdon You posted in 2000 that it was a 455 ISTR. 455s were booked there daily - see my other post in thread. -- Nick |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jock Mackirdy wrote:
The only d.c. train ever to get as far as Farringdon (AFAIK) was a test train run one Sunday as part of the commissioning of the Snow Hill route. I have slides of the event. It must have thrown up some snags - the actual start of through running was about 3 months later. Not necessarily... they would hardly run the test train one day before the timetabled start of through running. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() There is the rearrangement of the lines into Blackfriars to consider, and some of the existing southeastern and south central routes are going to become Thameslink through routes. In the peaks the through lines north of Blackfriars will be at full capacity, so there is probably even less likelihood of trains from the south stopping at City Thameslink, I would have thought... Paul S Incorrect! South Eastern or Southern will not be diverting any of it's services through the tunnel to the North. First Capital Connect will have it's own services on the Midland and Great Northern extended/diverted onto the Southern to places like Dartford, Ashford, Sevenoaks, and the South Coast(Sussex) |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christine" wrote in message ... There is the rearrangement of the lines into Blackfriars to consider, and some of the existing southeastern and south central routes are going to become Thameslink through routes. In the peaks the through lines north of Blackfriars will be at full capacity, so there is probably even less likelihood of trains from the south stopping at City Thameslink, I would have thought... Paul S Incorrect! South Eastern or Southern will not be diverting any of it's services through the tunnel to the North. First Capital Connect will have it's own services on the Midland and Great Northern extended/diverted onto the Southern to places like Dartford, Ashford, Sevenoaks, and the South Coast(Sussex) I didn't suggest Southern services would be diverted - I said Thameslink would be providing services on some existing SE/Southern routes. It can therefore be assumed that services on some existing routes will be converted to Thameslink services, as there won't be paths available to simply add extra Thameslink services... Paul |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
465s finally get CCTV (and new displays) | London Transport | |||
Thameslink Train Kentish Town to Farringdon | London Transport | |||
Serious arcing at Farringdon | London Transport | |||
Farringdon Tickets | London Transport | |||
Eighteen LU trains damaged at Farringdon... | London Transport |