![]() |
Opposition to the West London Tram steps up
In message , Tim Roll-Pickering
writes martyn dawe wrote: The trouble with the English, is that they all think of trams as something out a 50s film, They don't go to places which have modern tram systems ? You mean like Croydon? Yes |I know , but most Brits have never seem a modern tram system, there the Brit Nimbly effect , don't people think the planners have thought it out ? -- martyn dawe |
Opposition to the West London Tram steps up
Because last year the two Labour-controlled councils were voted
out because they supported the tram. I think it MIGHT have had something to do with other issues, tbh. |
Opposition to the West London Tram steps up
:-)Hammersmith & Fulham Conservatives also pledged to cut Council Tax - and
they did. Council meets manifesto commitment shocka ! |
Opposition to the West London Tram steps up
3. The £315 figure is based on a £1bn estimate for the build cost
The Croydon Tramlink cost a fortune and the Council Tax in Croydon/Merton/Bromley did not increase by 30% - why do you think it will now ? Face facts, the only reason that the 3 Councils oppose it, is because Labour support it, and Labour Councils proposed it. |
Opposition to the West London Tram steps up
|
Opposition to the West London Tram steps up
However, there is a limit to the capacity you can get from such a bus
service without more infrastructure (at very high frequencies, buses will need to be able to overtake each other easily). Longer vehicles will be needed (longer than the current bendy buses) - and that brings us right back to trams or tram-like technology (e.g. optically-guided multi-articulated buses). As a daily user of the 207 or 607 route, I am obviously supportive of the tram. However I have been surprised, when talking to people, about the strength of local opposition. Moreover, the more I use the route, the more I feel that some quite cheap measures (a few more bus lanes, some prioritisation at lights, better management of the driving schedules) could be put in place within 12 months to really speed up the bus routes on the Uxbridge Road. I would suggest that the project should be put on hold for 18 months while some other measures are tried. I have read again and again about the impossibility of putting more buses on this route and I simply do not believe it to be true. |
Opposition to the West London Tram steps up
|
Opposition to the West London Tram steps up
On 25 Jan, 21:07, "Tim Roll-Pickering" wrote: martyn dawe wrote: The trouble with the English, is that they all think of trams as something out a 50s film, They don't go to places which have modern tram systems ?You mean like Croydon? Why would someone from Ealing go to Croydon? The have an IKEA on the North Circular. In general, lack of perspective seems to be a problem with the town planners. They probably go on holiday to Spain or Florida, and miss out seeing what has been done with trams and bikes in Scandinavia, Netherlands and Germany. |
Opposition to the West London Tram steps up
|
Opposition to the West London Tram steps up
alexterrell wrote:
On 25 Jan, 21:07, "Tim Roll-Pickering" wrote: martyn dawe wrote: The trouble with the English, is that they all think of trams as something out a 50s film, They don't go to places which have modern tram systems ?You mean like Croydon? Why would someone from Ealing go to Croydon? The have an IKEA on the North Circular. In general, lack of perspective seems to be a problem with the town planners. They probably go on holiday to Spain or Florida, and miss out seeing what has been done with trams and bikes in Scandinavia, Netherlands and Germany. Which town planners are you levelling this at? It's the (borough) politicians who are opposed to the tram; the (borough) planners are probably the same ones as when the tram was originally proposed. I also know that quite a number of borough planners have seen what has been done with bikes in the Netherlands and Germany! -- Dave Arquati www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk