![]() |
A stock after closure of ELL
In message .com,
Boltar writes Once the ELL gets switched over the 3rd rail is St Marys curve going to be lifted or will it be left intact just in case LU want to move stock onto the national rail network at some point in the future? It is being retained, according to alwaystouchout.com -- Paul Terry |
A stock after closure of ELL
On Mar 15, 1:55 pm, "Jack Taylor" wrote:
John B wrote: Also, AIUI St Mary's Curve is not going to be lifted, although it's unlikely to see much use given the new Metronet-National Rail link way out east (Barking, is it?) I have a feeling that it was Upminster. It was, but an OHLE stanchion and the need to take an engineering possession of the Upminster-Romford line means that the connection will actually be going in at Barking. |
A stock after closure of ELL
TheOneKEA wrote:
It was, but an OHLE stanchion and the need to take an engineering possession of the Upminster-Romford line means that the connection will actually be going in at Barking. Thanks for the correction. I don't recall actually reading anything about that change before. |
A stock after closure of ELL
Sorry if I missed something, but isn't ELL already completely 3rd rail?
"Boltar" wrote in message oups.com... Once the ELL gets switched over the 3rd rail is St Marys curve going to be lifted or will it be left intact just in case LU want to move stock onto the national rail network at some point in the future? B2003 |
A stock after closure of ELL
On Mar 17, 12:40 am, wrote:
Sorry if I missed something, but isn't ELL already completely 3rd rail? "Boltar" wrote in message oups.com... Once the ELL gets switched over the 3rd rail is St Marys curve going to be lifted or will it be left intact just in case LU want to move stock onto the national rail network at some point in the future? B2003 Nope. It's only fourth rail, despite information published in the past. |
A stock after closure of ELL
Jack Taylor wrote:
TheOneKEA wrote: Leaving the WLL in its current electrified state is a colossal mistake. At a minimum the OHLE should be extended south to Shepherd's Bush, and at a maximum, it should be extended south to Kensington Olympia with the up platform road reinstated to provide four fully bidirectional roads through the station, releasing capacity in both directions to allow for additional passenger/freight usage (especially if Imperial Wharf station ever opens). Converting most of the NLL to AC would be a good idea. Both of those comments scream out common sense. I'm sure that I read somewhere (a couple of years ago) that there were plans to move the AC/DC changeover point further south (it may even have been at Shepherds Bush station) for practical reasons, BICBW. There have been plans to do this for some time, but the issue is the Hammersmith & City line - AIUI the signalling is not immunised, so the overhead can't be extended south until the H&C gets resignalled (which may not be until 2014). -- Dave Arquati www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
A stock after closure of ELL
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 10:41:40 +0000, Dave A wrote:
Both of those comments scream out common sense. I'm sure that I read somewhere (a couple of years ago) that there were plans to move the AC/DC changeover point further south (it may even have been at Shepherds Bush station) for practical reasons, BICBW. There have been plans to do this for some time, but the issue is the Hammersmith & City line - AIUI the signalling is not immunised, so the overhead can't be extended south until the H&C gets resignalled (which may not be until 2014). It *could* be extended south before then, but that would mean having to pay for the existing H&C signalling to be immunised (as well as that on the Central). They've decided it's too expensive, but said they might reconsider when the H&C signalling is renewed (and it'll be cheaper to have it immunised). |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk