![]() |
Croxley Rail Link Petition
On Mar 30, 9:04 pm, "Adrian" wrote:
it will save many trips to Euston by way of Euston Square. :-) If that is the priority, new exits at the far eastern end of Euston Square with steps/escalators inclined towards Euston would be a far more cost effective solution. -- Nick |
Croxley Rail Link Petition
"Charles Ellson" wrote in message
... Sounds like a good idea to me, if it gives a link to the WCML northbound from places like Harrow, Harrow and Wealdstone to Euston or Watford Junction ? Nowhere near Harrow. Etc. Is it just a co-incidence that this "oh my god, hands up in horror, what's the point, nothing can be done and even if it could it wouldn't work so why try" thread appears at the same time as "Airdrie to Bathgate re-opening". Regards Jonathan |
Croxley Rail Link Petition
|
Croxley Rail Link Petition
On 30 Mar, 21:04, "Adrian" wrote:
On Mar 29, 7:06 am, "THC" wrote: Jack, tryhttp://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Croxleylink/ Kev, I'm sure you're aware that TfL have already committed funding to this project - £18m if memory serves me - as part of their five-year investment programme. This project would provide excellent network benefits and open up the commercial centre of Watford to rail access from large parts of north-west London and south Bucks. It suffers for falling between the gaps in public sector responsibility but is backed locally, regionally and in the Government Office for the region. Someone at DfT needs to have their arse kicked, I think, metaphorically speaking of course. I for one hope this project gets the go-ahead. THC My "signature" is on the pettition. I sincerely hope this happens. It will give Metroland residents a direct link to the WCML. I am sure it will save many trips to Euston by way of Euston Square. :-) Ah, but as people will find out at a briefing on Tuesday, from December 2008 VWC will see a serious reduction in calls at Watford Junction. So will the link be needed for that particular purpose. (just a note again here - DfT Rail basically decides on the calling pattern for franchises and wants to push people from Watford onto the new West Midlands franchise semi-fast trains that will serve Watford Jn every hour - before the usual anti-Virgin flames ignite again). However I am personally in favour of restoring the Croxley Rail Link and will sign the petition - even as a Manchester resident! Tony |
Croxley Rail Link Petition
On Mar 30, 2:23 pm, "D7666" wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:44 pm, wrote: I don't think that that is the priority. I agree - I am sure it is not, it just appeared it was the previous commentators' priority. -- Nick On the contrary, it was precisely my point. Currently any resident of Metroland wanting to use what BR termed "InterCity" services from Euston had to make his or her way to that terminus. This link will make the WCML directly accessible at Watford Junction. Adrian |
Croxley Rail Link Petition
|
Croxley Rail Link Petition
|
Croxley Rail Link Petition
On 31 Mar, 13:38, Tom Anderson wrote:
This is for Watford - London trips? Aren't most of those set-down only already? Only for Virgin. The semi-fasts (Silverlink County/West Midlands) and local (Silverlink Metro/London Overground) are meant for journeys to London (journey times are 15/25/50 minutes respectively). U |
Croxley Rail Link Petition
Ah, but as people will find out at a briefing on Tuesday, from December 2008 VWC will see a serious reduction in calls at Watford Junction. So will the link be needed for that particular purpose. (just a note again here - DfT Rail basically decides on the calling pattern for franchises and wants to push people from Watford onto the new West Midlands franchise semi-fast trains that will serve Watford Jn every hour - before the usual anti-Virgin flames ignite again). However I am personally in favour of restoring the Croxley Rail Link and will sign the petition - even as a Manchester resident! Tony What briefing is this? Is it open to the public? Burkey |
Croxley Rail Link Petition
On 30 Mar 2007 12:13:55 -0700, "D7666" wrote:
On Mar 30, 7:47 pm, "Mr Thant" wrote: No, but as you mentioned, only a fraction of the old network exists (or at least, is available to LO services), so it's not really relevant to current and future service provision. I'm sorry, but I agree with the earlier comment that you seem to know 6ugger all about it - or at least not about the history of it - since the majority of the old network DOES exist. The only bits that do not exist today are Broad Street itself from Dalston Junction, and the short electrified sections to Kensington and Earls Court, and the Rickmansworth bit. I suggest that the Kensington section still exists! Other non-existent bits are the direct kink from Bushey to the branches and (as an electrified passenger line) the Kew Bridge branch. The rest - Euston to Watford and Richmond - Dalston (junction) remain - by far the greatest mileage, the core routes of the old network, and the core routes of Silverlink metro today. -- Nick -- Peter Lawrence |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk