![]() |
Exceptions to NR zonal fares?
Hi,
I was checking fares on the NR journey planner and noticed cheap day returns from South Tottenham (Z3) to Upper Holloway and Gospel Oak (both Z2) cost £2.40 and £2.70, when under the zone rules they should both be £2.80. Digging further, tickets to places further around the NLL seem to increase gradually with distance (eg South Acton is £4.50), even though it's still all Z2-3 and should all be the same price. What am I missing? U |
Exceptions to NR zonal fares?
On 20 Apr 2007 00:37:37 -0700, Mr Thant wrote:
I was checking fares on the NR journey planner and noticed cheap day returns from South Tottenham (Z3) to Upper Holloway and Gospel Oak (both Z2) cost £2.40 and £2.70, when under the zone rules they should both be £2.80. Digging further, tickets to places further around the NLL seem to increase gradually with distance (eg South Acton is £4.50), even though it's still all Z2-3 and should all be the same price. What am I missing? The National Fares Manual includes a 3-letter code next to each fare to indicate which company sets that fare. Most NR zonal fares are shown as being set by "DBA" (not sure who that is). But the NLL ones you quote are shown as being set by STS (Silverlink). So it does indeed seem to be an exception. |
Exceptions to NR zonal fares?
asdf wrote:
The National Fares Manual includes a 3-letter code next to each fare to indicate which company sets that fare. Most NR zonal fares are shown as being set by "DBA" (not sure who that is). But the NLL ones you quote are shown as being set by STS (Silverlink). So it does indeed seem to be an exception. I think DBA probably stands for Database Administrator, and appears on all the fares set by TfL rather than a TOC. HTH, Barry |
Exceptions to NR zonal fares?
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Barry Salter wrote:
asdf wrote: The National Fares Manual includes a 3-letter code next to each fare to indicate which company sets that fare. Most NR zonal fares are shown as being set by "DBA" (not sure who that is). But the NLL ones you quote are shown as being set by STS (Silverlink). So it does indeed seem to be an exception. I think DBA probably stands for Database Administrator, and appears on all the fares set by TfL rather than a TOC. I doubt it stands for that, but that's surely what it means. I'd guess something like Direct Basis Arrangement, or some other obscure term for the deal under which TfL got to set the fares. DfT Binding Agreement? Alternatively, it could be my dad, since those are his initials. Unlikely, though. tom -- REMOVE AND DESTROY |
Exceptions to NR zonal fares?
On 23 Apr, 15:08, asdf wrote:
The National Fares Manual includes a 3-letter code next to each fare to indicate which company sets that fare. Most NR zonal fares are shown as being set by "DBA" (not sure who that is). But the NLL ones you quote are shown as being set by STS (Silverlink). So it does indeed seem to be an exception. I emailed ATOC and weirdly they say it's becuse TfL are setting the fares in advance of taking the whole lot over. Weren't the zonal fares TfL's idea in the first place? U |
Exceptions to NR zonal fares?
"Mr Thant" wrote in message oups.com... On 23 Apr, 15:08, asdf wrote: The National Fares Manual includes a 3-letter code next to each fare to indicate which company sets that fare. Most NR zonal fares are shown as being set by "DBA" (not sure who that is). But the NLL ones you quote are shown as being set by STS (Silverlink). So it does indeed seem to be an exception. I emailed ATOC and weirdly they say it's becuse TfL are setting the fares in advance of taking the whole lot over. Weren't the zonal fares TfL's idea in the first place? Perhaps TfL intend to change the zones that the NLL passes through, IIRC there have been a few odd changes in the past haven't there? Paul |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk