![]() |
St Pancras Thameslink Platforms (Midland Rd)
D7666 wrote:
In which case we shall have to defer judgement on St.Pancras Whatever- They-Call-It until it is finally open and complete - because it may be intuitive once we have the final solution. There is someone on Wikipedia (see 'Matthewriley') who claims to be an insider and on http://tinyurl.com/39g6yf he states that the DfT made the decision to name the whole complex St Pancras International during the previous April (although there are no public announcements of any sort). |
St Pancras Thameslink Platforms (Midland Rd)
Paul Scott wrote:
"Peter Lawrence" wrote in message ... On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:11:50 GMT, Sky Rider wrote: On a side note the new Thameslink station will (like the station above) be called St Pancras International. Who has announced that? No one AFAICT - but it is implied quite strongly in FCC's current timetable booklet, which clearly refers to their trains stopping at 'St Pancras International' from Dec 9th. It was discussed in uk.transport.london a month or so back. There is someone on Wikipedia by the name of 'Matthewriley' who claims to be an insider and he states that it was announced internally by the DfT in April (see http://tinyurl.com/39g6yf). Another than that I can't find anything else. |
St Pancras Thameslink Platforms (Midland Rd)
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, jonmorris wrote:
(many people still not even considering [Thameslink] as a good way to get from north London to south London in a few minutes, instead of - most likely - going around the Circle line or going through central London on busy lines like the Piccadilly Line or Victoria Line). The service frequency from King's Cross to Blackfriars makes it almost as good as any other tube line, but I bet loads of people never consider it (and not having it on the tube map probably doesn't help!). That's it, though - between KX and Blackfriars, it's great, but outside that, it gets rubbish fast, as most of the trains are fasts, and don't stop at Kentish Town, Elephant, etc. tom -- megaptera novae angliae, soundwork chris draper, push, pull, open, .. |
St Pancras Thameslink Platforms (Midland Rd)
"jonmorris" wrote in message ups.com... On 11 Jun, 20:15, "Paul Scott" wrote: No one AFAICT - but it is implied quite strongly in FCC's current timetable booklet, which clearly refers to their trains stopping at 'St Pancras International' from Dec 9th. It was discussed in uk.transport.london a month or so back. It makes perfect sense to capitalise on the International part. FCC Thameslink will ultimately run a service that takes in Gatwick Airport, St Pancras Eurostar and Luton Airport - as well as very good connections through central London This is now a somewhat more emphatic FCC statement as well: http://www.firstcapitalconnect.co.uk...?iCmsPageId=77 "From Sunday 9 December 2007, First Capital Connect services on the Thameslink route will join Eurostar and Midland Mainline in serving St Pancras International..." Paul S |
St Pancras Thameslink Platforms (Midland Rd)
jonmorris wrote:
The service frequency from King's Cross to Blackfriars makes it almost as good as any other tube line, but I bet loads of people never consider it (and not having it on the tube map probably doesn't help!). Indeed. The other day I happened to be at a Lib Dem transport policy launch (in my students' union capacity) and one person asked about the possibility of reviving plans to extend the Northern Line to Sutton, giving as his example getting to King's Cross. He was a little taken aback when it was pointed out there is a direct train service! |
St Pancras Thameslink Platforms (Midland Rd)
On Jun 11, 9:29 pm, Roland Perry wrote:
Yes, but the entrance to platforms 9-11 are in a different building to the main shed. I agree it's borderline, but from the buffers of each set of platforms you are unaware where the others are (if you were a complete stranger). Muenchen Hbf and Manchester Picc both have sets of platforms that could be considered a separate station. The former in particular is laid out very much like KX - indeed I believe they were once a separate station in Muenchen's case. Neil |
St Pancras Thameslink Platforms (Midland Rd)
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:11:30 GMT, Jack Taylor wrote:
But all the CJ platforms are next to one another, and you don't have to do any special orientation to get from one to the other. Similarly for the two "sets of" LB through platforms. What I'm looking for is places where the sets of platforms are completely disjoint. For example, KX main shed and KX suburban just about qualify, but Paddington main and suburban probably don't. At the northern end, KX platforms 8 (main) and 9 (suburban) are just opposite faces of the same platform island. Only for about fifteen or twenty feet. But still enough to stop them being "completely disjoint" (although I accept that from the POV of an unfamiliar passenger, they are). |
St Pancras Thameslink Platforms (Midland Rd)
On Jun 12, 12:01 pm, Tom Anderson wrote:
That's it, though - between KX and Blackfriars, it's great, but outside that, it gets rubbish fast, as most of the trains are fasts, and don't stop at Kentish Town, Elephant, etc. Eh? ''most of the trains are fasts'' ???? Either read a timetable or don't exaggerate. Core pattern is 50% are 'fast' and 50% are 'slow' - half the trains through KX/Blackfriars all call at both stations you cite - Kentish Town anf E&C. -- Nick |
St Pancras Thameslink Platforms (Midland Rd)
On Jun 12, 12:45 pm, Neil Williams wrote:
Muenchen Hbf It was in fact München Hbf I was thinking of in relation to SPI (as I shall now call St Pancras International) as the overall footprint is similar - a deeper train shed in the centre with two wings one on each side. In fact there are more parallels as one could consider the S-bahn tief Bf platforms as equivalent to the Thameslink route, and the U-bahn as equivalent to LU lines - and both U-bahn and LU have diverse entrances and underground passages. München Hbf is a location I know well having had several weeks in each year in late 80s / early 90s commuting through the place in several different permutations depending on which hotel was based at. I would estimate some of the inter-line walks are further than those that will exist at SPI when it is complete. Mind you, I suspect München Hbf will always be better signed. -- Nick |
St Pancras Thameslink Platforms (Midland Rd)
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, D7666 wrote:
On Jun 12, 12:01 pm, Tom Anderson wrote: That's it, though - between KX and Blackfriars, it's great, but outside that, it gets rubbish fast, as most of the trains are fasts, and don't stop at Kentish Town, Elephant, etc. Eh? ''most of the trains are fasts'' ???? Either read a timetable or don't exaggerate. Never! Core pattern is 50% are 'fast' and 50% are 'slow' - half the trains through KX/Blackfriars all call at both stations you cite - Kentish Town anf E&C. My apologies. I was thinking of the post-TLnK plan, where there should be 24 tph through the core, but only 6 tph suburban trains. At present, it's 8 total, of which 4 are suburban. Thus, my point that the frequency at the suburban stations is too low to be useful as a tube line stands, and moreover, Jon Morris's point, which you've helpfully snipped, that "the service frequency from King's Cross to Blackfriars makes it almost as good as any other tube line" is also shown to be an outrageous lie - 8 tph is barely a turn-up-and-go frequency, and not what i call tube frequency. Perhaps if you've been unlucky enough to grow up out in the western branches of the Magical District Line Tree, you might think so, but as someone who lives at Finsbury Park, i don't. tom -- Arse! My iron undercrackers have rusted up again. -- The OED |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk