![]() |
MAJOR Disruption at Slough on FGW
Most trains delayed by hours or cancelled to/from Paddington and
points west of Slough. FGW services in complete disarray. Been going on on most of Sunday afternoon, evening. BUT few announcements at intermediate stations, cancellations at short notice despite birng planned many hours in advance, and NO buses subsituted round the blockage. Typical reponse of a company that doesn't give a st*ff about its long suffering paying pax. HEX and Connet apparently running to/ from LHR OK. CJB. |
MAJOR Disruption at Slough on FGW
CJB wrote:
Most trains delayed by hours or cancelled to/from Paddington and points west of Slough. FGW services in complete disarray. Been going on on most of Sunday afternoon, evening. BUT few announcements at intermediate stations, cancellations at short notice despite birng planned many hours in advance, and NO buses subsituted round the blockage. According to the National Rail site, some buses ARE being laid on: "Train services between Slough and Reading are being disrupted due to signalling problems. Alterations and delays of over 60 minutes are occurring. A limited train service is operating between London Paddington and Reading. An amended train service is operating between London Paddington and Slough, with replacement road transport operating between Slough and Reading. Road transport is operating between Maidenhead and Marlow. There is no estimate for a normal service to resume." (timed at 19:30) Typical reponse of a company that doesn't give a st*ff about its long suffering paying pax. Typical comment from someone with an axe to grind? Since some trains are getting through, how do you know that some short-notice cancellations were actually "planned many hours in advance"? Are you sure they were definitely planned to happen rather than being planned as a contingency in case the failure hadn't been cleared in time? HEX and Connet apparently running to/ from LHR OK. As expected, since the signalling system failure is between Slough and Reading. I would be interested in an *objective* report on FGW's response to this Network Rail failure. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
MAJOR Disruption at Slough on FGW
In message . com, at
11:38:07 on Sun, 15 Jul 2007, CJB remarked: Most trains delayed by hours or cancelled to/from Paddington and points west of Slough. FGW services in complete disarray. Been going on on most of Sunday afternoon, evening. Must have missed that: I departed Reading at 14.33 - the train was nearly 10 minutes early arriving from Paddington. -- Roland Perry |
MAJOR Disruption at Slough on FGW
On 15 Jul, 21:17, Roland Perry wrote:
In message . com, at 11:38:07 on Sun, 15 Jul 2007, CJB remarked: Most trains delayed by hours or cancelled to/from Paddington and points west of Slough. FGW services in complete disarray. Been going on on most of Sunday afternoon, evening. Must have missed that: I departed Reading at 14.33 - the train was nearly 10 minutes early arriving from Paddington. -- Roland Perry Sounds like cable theft again to me! THere was some major problems at Barnes a few weeks back for the same reason. I suppose on a Sunday there are more hi-vis wearing bods about so they wouldn't look so suspicous. I mean generally a signal failure or signalling problems wouldnt amount to this level of disruption would it? |
MAJOR Disruption at Slough on FGW
Roland Perry wrote:
In message . com, at 11:38:07 on Sun, 15 Jul 2007, CJB remarked: Most trains delayed by hours or cancelled to/from Paddington and points west of Slough. FGW services in complete disarray. Been going on on most of Sunday afternoon, evening. Must have missed that: I departed Reading at 14.33 - the train was nearly 10 minutes early arriving from Paddington. I finally got back to London well over two hours late. Train from Ledbury at 1646 was running fine as far as Oxford, where the train manager sounded very surprised to announce that the service was cancelled (after loads of people had gotten on and it was full and standing). Then, after about ten minutes of general confusion, the service was announced as continuing to Didcot so everyone piled back on again to get to Didcot (in retrospect, a bad idea... I should've followed my instinct and gotten straight on the coach from Oxford). More hanging around at Didcot with hundreds of passengers being advised to wait for the next London train, a 35-minute-late service which was being reported on the displays as "full and standing from Bath". A London stopping service from Oxford turned up after about 15 mins, which about half the passengers decided to gamble on since it was actually there; it travelled along without incident as far as Reading when it was announced as terminating there just before arriving. Mayhem at Reading with various London services standing in the platforms, a queueing system in operation for Waterloo trains, but little in the way of announcements other than a scrawled noticeboard next to the (empty) information desk. I tried to get on a Railair coach to Heathrow which was about to depart but my ticket (London Terminals) was rejected ("we don't get any revenue from that") so I went off and bought another ticket and then waited for the next coach 30 mins later, boarded with about two other passengers, and then trundled into London by Tube from Heathrow. I was not impressed by the poor level of information (except from the train manager of the original service who cheerfully gave out all the information he had), and I'll wait with baited breath to see if First will refund my Railair ticket as well as my original ticket... Ironically I was almost due a refund for the outward journey on Friday evening thanks to a racially abusive (and slightly violent) passenger in my carriage who had to be carted off the train at Slough and delayed it by about 55 minutes. -- Dave A www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
MAJOR Disruption at Slough on FGW
Standing at HN28 signal wrote:
On 15 Jul, 21:17, Roland Perry wrote: In message . com, at 11:38:07 on Sun, 15 Jul 2007, CJB remarked: Most trains delayed by hours or cancelled to/from Paddington and points west of Slough. FGW services in complete disarray. Been going on on most of Sunday afternoon, evening. Must have missed that: I departed Reading at 14.33 - the train was nearly 10 minutes early arriving from Paddington. Sounds like cable theft again to me! THere was some major problems at Barnes a few weeks back for the same reason. I suppose on a Sunday there are more hi-vis wearing bods about so they wouldn't look so suspicous. I mean generally a signal failure or signalling problems wouldnt amount to this level of disruption would it? Might well have been weather related. There was an almighty thunderstorm, with torrential rain, that passed across the area and up through the Chilterns and across towards Milton Keynes and Bedford at around 16:30-17:00. Could well have been the result of a lightning strike. |
MAJOR Disruption at Slough on FGW
H&H 16.45:
Turned up at 16.45 Hayes & Harlington for 16.59 train to Oxford. VDU in foyer said train was on time. Then at 16.55 an announcement stated that it was cancelled. VDU now saidf it was cancelled - no reason given. Question: why did they wait until it was almost due to announce that it was cancelled since all Oxford trains had been cancelled all afternoon (and still are at 02.00 am next day). Then at 17.05 a 'special' arrived for Slough - but no announcements were made. The ticket office at H&H wasd closed. There were no station staff on duty. No announcements were being made. destinations screens remained uninformative. Paddington 23.15: All trains into/out of cancelled or 'delayed.' Last Connect left at about 23.00. Only ONE local service to Reading 00.35. Question: why couldn't Connect have laid on an extra service for local stations to H&H at say 23.45? No NR / FGW customer service staff visible on concourse. No info. on display screens. NO BUS SUBSTITUTIONS for local stations - zero, zilch, sfa. No audible announcements (a few inaudible announcements drowned out by echos as usual). Typical lack of customer service for a trainco that really does want to lose its franchise - and the sooner the better. CJB. On Jul 15, 11:56 pm, Dave A wrote: Roland Perry wrote: In message . com, at 11:38:07 on Sun, 15 Jul 2007, CJB remarked: Most trains delayed by hours or cancelled to/from Paddington and points west of Slough. FGW services in complete disarray. Been going on on most of Sunday afternoon, evening. Must have missed that: I departed Reading at 14.33 - the train was nearly 10 minutes early arriving from Paddington. I finally got back to London well over two hours late. Train from Ledbury at 1646 was running fine as far as Oxford, where the train manager sounded very surprised to announce that the service was cancelled (after loads of people had gotten on and it was full and standing). Then, after about ten minutes of general confusion, the service was announced as continuing to Didcot so everyone piled back on again to get to Didcot (in retrospect, a bad idea... I should've followed my instinct and gotten straight on the coach from Oxford). More hanging around at Didcot with hundreds of passengers being advised to wait for the next London train, a 35-minute-late service which was being reported on the displays as "full and standing from Bath". A London stopping service from Oxford turned up after about 15 mins, which about half the passengers decided to gamble on since it was actually there; it travelled along without incident as far as Reading when it was announced as terminating there just before arriving. Mayhem at Reading with various London services standing in the platforms, a queueing system in operation for Waterloo trains, but little in the way of announcements other than a scrawled noticeboard next to the (empty) information desk. I tried to get on a Railair coach to Heathrow which was about to depart but my ticket (London Terminals) was rejected ("we don't get any revenue from that") so I went off and bought another ticket and then waited for the next coach 30 mins later, boarded with about two other passengers, and then trundled into London by Tube from Heathrow. I was not impressed by the poor level of information (except from the train manager of the original service who cheerfully gave out all the information he had), and I'll wait with baited breath to see if First will refund my Railair ticket as well as my original ticket... Ironically I was almost due a refund for the outward journey on Friday evening thanks to a racially abusive (and slightly violent) passenger in my carriage who had to be carted off the train at Slough and delayed it by about 55 minutes. -- Dave Awww.alwaystouchout.com- Transport projects in London |
MAJOR Disruption at Slough on FGW
On Jul 15, 4:00 pm, "Jack Taylor" wrote:
Might well have been weather related. There was an almighty thunderstorm, with torrential rain, that passed across the area and up through the Chilterns and across towards Milton Keynes and Bedford at around 16:30-17:00. Could well have been the result of a lightning strike. Yeah we got that here in Luton and it was a pretty widespread event. Sounds like a bad lightning strike on a trackside eqpt somewhere. -- Nick |
MAJOR Disruption at Slough on FGW
In message , at 21:17:21 on Sun, 15 Jul
2007, Roland Perry remarked: Most trains delayed by hours or cancelled to/from Paddington and points west of Slough. FGW services in complete disarray. Been going on on most of Sunday afternoon, evening. Must have missed that: I departed Reading at 14.33 - the train was nearly 10 minutes early arriving from Paddington. Trains to London from Plymouth (and Penzance) substituted by a 150 to Exeter St Davids "Auto-announcer: 10.41 to Exter St Davids, this train does not call at Reading or Paddington"/"Person-announcer: Board this train for Paddington, change at Exeter St Davids". I suppose FGW are having trouble getting enough rolling stock down here yet. -- Roland Perry |
MAJOR Disruption at Slough on FGW
In message , at 10:45:16 on Mon, 16 Jul
2007, Roland Perry remarked: I suppose FGW are having trouble getting enough rolling stock down here yet. VXC not 100% together, either. Train pretty full and two different ladies both have a reservation for the seat opposite me (verified by the staff), reservation displays not working (nor are scrolling displays over the doors) and they are using the traditional printed seat back labels. No at-seat service in 1st, with passengers asked to go to the shop and show their FC ticket. Oh, and I have a wonderful view (not) through a beige pillar, just the same as on Voyager the way down - do they deliberately give those seats to people with really cheap tickets? -- Roland Perry |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk