Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 30, 10:04 pm, "BH Williams" wrote:
"John" wrote in message ... In article , writes "BH Williams" wrote in message ... Yes, it does. Currently, both TVM signalling and OCS start just east of Fawkham Junction, somewhat to the north of Ashford. Do you mean to say that the entire line from St. Pancras will run this type of signalling and power source? What will happen to the contact shoes, interestingly enough? They'll be removed, there being no further use for them Famous last words. Why don't they simply keep them just in case? Its not like the extra few kilos will make much difference to a 400 ton train. What is it with railways that as soon as something isn't needed its immediately removed/ripped up/sold off with no thought given to any possible future need. Any railway with passengers as the highest priority would keep waterloo as a backup destination in case of problems but I suppose its just easier to stop all the trains and tell the passengers to hitchike home. B2003 |
#82
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 30, 10:13 pm, "BH Williams" wrote:
Third-rail gear will be removed pretty sharpish, I imagine- it can be a real pain if it decides to fail in the down position, as I discovered when one took out some track-circuit- related equipment at the UK portal at the beginning of a morning shift. They were still fixing it when I finished What idiot decided to put the equipment where it could be fouled by shoegear? Given a 319 traversed the tunnel when it first opened this equipment must be an afterthought. B2003 |
#83
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:31:15 -0700, Boltar wrote:
On Jul 30, 10:13 pm, "BH Williams" wrote: Third-rail gear will be removed pretty sharpish, I imagine- it can be a real pain if it decides to fail in the down position, as I discovered when one took out some track-circuit- related equipment at the UK portal at the beginning of a morning shift. They were still fixing it when I finished What idiot decided to put the equipment where it could be fouled by shoegear? Given a 319 traversed the tunnel when it first opened this equipment must be an afterthought. In Continental Europe, that position is 'fair game' for line side equipment. They could have built the tunnel with all gear clear of the 3rd rail shoe, but all that does is move the problem of fallen/non retracted shoe gear to the French portal. -- Matthew Geier |
#84
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Boltar" wrote in message ups.com... On Jul 30, 10:13 pm, "BH Williams" wrote: Third-rail gear will be removed pretty sharpish, I imagine- it can be a real pain if it decides to fail in the down position, as I discovered when one took out some track-circuit- related equipment at the UK portal at the beginning of a morning shift. They were still fixing it when I finished What idiot decided to put the equipment where it could be fouled by shoegear? Given a 319 traversed the tunnel when it first opened this equipment must be an afterthought. ISTR 319s having trouble when they worked to Rugby, when their shoegear fouled nice high ballast shoulders on the WCML. Peter |
#85
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boltar wrote:
What will happen to the contact shoes, interestingly enough? They'll be removed, there being no further use for them Famous last words. Why don't they simply keep them just in case? There will be no point. Eurostar drivers will very soon lose route knowledge and therefore be unable to work away from HS1 -- Bob |
#86
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Peter Masson
writes ISTR 319s having trouble when they worked to Rugby, when their shoegear fouled nice high ballast shoulders on the WCML. Memory says that when the 313s went to Clacton for a while, they had to have the shoegear removed for similar reasons. And I'm sure I've seen a notice that 313s were banned from certain tracks on Euston-Camden if they had shoes. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
#87
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Clive D. W. Feather" wrote in message ... In article , Peter Masson writes ISTR 319s having trouble when they worked to Rugby, when their shoegear fouled nice high ballast shoulders on the WCML. Memory says that when the 313s went to Clacton for a while, they had to have the shoegear removed for similar reasons. And I'm sure I've seen a notice that 313s were banned from certain tracks on Euston-Camden if they had shoes. ISTR that the 377s that now work the Watford junction service have retractable shoegear ... D A Stocks |
#88
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 1, 8:08 pm, "Bob Wood" wrote:
Boltar wrote: What will happen to the contact shoes, interestingly enough? They'll be removed, there being no further use for them Famous last words. Why don't they simply keep them just in case? There will be no point. Eurostar drivers will very soon lose route knowledge and therefore be unable to work away from HS1 Ok , fair enough. But surely keeping the ability to move the stock on the 3rd rail network for some sort of stock or emergency move would outweigh the pennies saved in maintaining the equipment? B2003 |
#89
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 Aug, 10:13, Boltar wrote:
What will happen to the contact shoes, interestingly enough? They'll be removed, there being no further use for them Famous last words. Why don't they simply keep them just in case? There will be no point. Eurostar drivers will very soon lose route knowledge and therefore be unable to work away from HS1 Ok , fair enough. But surely keeping the ability to move the stock on the 3rd rail network for some sort of stock or emergency move would outweigh the pennies saved in maintaining the equipment? Doesn't have any real advantages over towing them with a loco - there won't be any drivers with 373 knowledge and 3rd rail route knowledge, so you'd need to bring one in specially - at which point, you might as well hire a 66-and-driver to do the move, & it's not really about the pennies saved by maintaining the equipment - it's more about removing the potential for it to go wrong and cause major delays, whether by thwacking French lineside equipment or [other]. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#90
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 2, 1:55 pm, John B wrote:
Doesn't have any real advantages over towing them with a loco - there won't be any drivers with 373 knowledge and 3rd rail route knowledge, so you'd need to bring one in specially - at which point, you might as well hire a 66-and-driver to do the move, Don't suppose anyone knows what will happen to the junction north of Ashford then when St Pancras goes live? Will the spur line onto the 3rd rail network be kept for maintenance trains or will it be lifted? B2003 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Taxi time from Paddington to St. Pancras International - Fridaymorning? | London Transport | |||
Stansted - St Pancras International - routeing query | London Transport | |||
St Pancras International opening day | London Transport | |||
Easy interchanges in London (Waterloo vs St. Pancras International) | London Transport | |||
Waterloo International to close when St Pancras International opens | London Transport |