![]() |
Camden Town revisited - many times, many,many times
On Sep 1, 6:46 am, Dave 2 wrote:
On Aug 24, 2:19 pm, alex_t wrote: A draft document reveals how one branch would run from Edgware to Kennington, while another would go from High Barnet through to Morden. Huh, I thought one *line* would run from Edgware to Morden, and another from High Barnet to Kennington? In any case, I hope that the line that will run to Kennington will keep the name Northern ;-) ... and one of the lines will need a new name, and map colour. Or an old name: City & South London? |
Camden Town revisited - many times, many,many times
City & South London Makes sense! |
Camden Town revisited - many times, many,many times
In article .com, John
B writes "It is a cover for reducing the service. The service was run like this in the past and they changed it to increase trains. Why would it work the other way round?" 3) unless he means Yerkes' amalgamation of the C&SLR and the CCE&HR in 1924, which may be a little long ago to be representative, there is no occasion when "the service was run like this in the past and they changed it to increase trains". Even so, the pre-amalgamation service wasn't two separate routes as being proposed, but both branches feeding the CX route and neither feeding the Bank route! So I don't think it's *ever* been run like that except as an emergency measure. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk