Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This wonderful phrase is currently being applied to the Circle,
District and H&C non-service. Does anyone know why? MaxB |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Sep, 19:40, MaxB wrote:
This wonderful phrase is currently being applied to the Circle, District and H&C non-service. Does anyone know why? At a guess, something trivially minor has happened to one of the C- stock trains that operates the Circle, H&C and relevant (Wimbleware) bits of the District line, and so the drivers have decided to give themselves an evening off by refusing to drive any C-stocks anywhere until Saint Bob has proclaimed them Officially Safe. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alleged defective dead man's handles (able to be reset in a "motoring"
position after operation instead of "off & release"). Oh and it's an ASLEF initiative instead of RMT this time. No doubt LU will be happy for Metronet SSL to carry the can.... |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "MaxB" wrote in message ups.com... This wonderful phrase is currently being applied to the Circle, District and H&C non-service. Does anyone know why? Did they really say that? Surely it's a tautology. The trains are unavailable because there is a lack of them. tim |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
tim..... wrote:
"MaxB" wrote in message ups.com... This wonderful phrase is currently being applied to the Circle, District and H&C non-service. Does anyone know why? Did they really say that? Surely it's a tautology. The trains are unavailable because there is a lack of them. I think you are confused. There is no lack of trains, but there is a severe lack of trains that are available for service. The trains are unavailable because of an alleged safety-related defect. "Lack of available trains" seems to me to be a perfectly clear non-tautological phrase. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard J." wrote in message .uk... tim..... wrote: "MaxB" wrote in message ups.com... This wonderful phrase is currently being applied to the Circle, District and H&C non-service. Does anyone know why? Did they really say that? Surely it's a tautology. The trains are unavailable because there is a lack of them. I think you are confused. There is no lack of trains, but there is a severe lack of trains that are available for service. The trains are unavailable because of an alleged safety-related defect. "Lack of available trains" seems to me to be a perfectly clear non-tautological phrase. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) The best announcements I've heard whilst waiting for a Circle line train for some time at Edgware Rd were "we cannot find the driver" and "the driver hasn't finished his tea break" Full support for the finishing tea break driver I got so fed up I switched to getting the Bakerloo line to and from Paddington |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 26, 10:14 pm, wrote:
Alleged defective dead man's handles (able to be reset in a "motoring" position after operation instead of "off & release"). Oh and it's an ASLEF initiative instead of RMT this time. No doubt LU will be happy for Metronet SSL to carry the can.... From the BBC: "Safety fears halt Tube services" http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/7015423.stm Just when I visit the place for the first time in several years... what surprises will today bring? Ian the Penguin |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:13:52 -0700, wrote:
Just when I visit the place for the first time in several years... what surprises will today bring? No service at all on the Wimbleware, Circle or Hammersmith and ****ty, if the BBC is anything to go by. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Sep, 21:14, wrote:
Alleged defective dead man's handles (able to be reset in a "motoring" position after operation instead of "off & release"). Oh and it's an ASLEF initiative instead of RMT this time. No doubt LU will be happy for Metronet SSL to carry the can.... ....although RMT are also involved according to the BBC article, and St Bob is the rentaquote speaker. If, as it sounds, the defect in question doesn't prevent the DMH from operating (i.e. your asleep/dead driver will still let go of it and the train will still stop), how does this have even the pretence of a safety issue? -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nicola Redwood wrote:
The best announcements I've heard whilst waiting for a Circle line train for some time at Edgware Rd were "we cannot find the driver" and "the driver hasn't finished his tea break" Full support for the finishing tea break driver I have heard exactly that too. When the driver arrived there was another announcement, first: "Driver, your train is on platform 3" (or whichever platform it was) and then something like "No, not that one driver, YOUR train is on platform 3". The train eventually left Edgware Road, as a Circle Line train with the text "Hammersmith" in the front... -- Olof Lagerkvist ICQ: 724451 Web: http://here.is/olof |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lack of trains on the drain | London Transport | |||
Sudbury Hill (Harrow) lack of information | London Transport | |||
FGW Link excels even Thames Strains at public safety (lack of ...) | London Transport | |||
Lack of road markings in Kensington & Chelsea | London Transport | |||
Thameslink ticket checks - or lack of! | London Transport |