Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 4, 3:43 pm, Tom Anderson wrote:
Aha. Assuming passengers buy singles costing an average of 2.50 each (Moorgate - Finsbury Park is 2.10, Moorgate - New Southgate is 3.10, so this is ballpark right), that would need 68 000 passengers (ticket sales, anyway) to break even. Over 52 weeks, that's 1308 people a week. That sounds like quite a lot, but plausible. The RUS actually has a full analysis: Costs (Present Value) Investment Cost 0.0 Operating Cost 1.7 Revenue -0.3 Other Government Impacts 0.0 Total costs 1.4 Benefi ts (Present Value) Rail users benefi ts 0.5 Non users benefi ts 0.0 Total quantifi ed benefi ts 0.5 NPV -1.0 Quantifi ed BCR 0.3 Those are £millions over 10 years for the weeknight service only. So they reckon it'll increase revenue by about £600/week, and values the convenience gained at £1,000/week. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Anderson" wrote in message h.li... On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Mr Thant wrote: The RUS puts the cost of running all weeknight trains to Moorgate at £170,000/year, mainly for extra staff to keep the line open. Aha. Assuming passengers buy singles costing an average of 2.50 each (Moorgate - Finsbury Park is 2.10, Moorgate - New Southgate is 3.10, so this is ballpark right), that would need 68 000 passengers (ticket sales, anyway) to break even. Over 52 weeks, that's 1308 people a week. That sounds like quite a lot, but plausible. But not as straightforward surely? What you are looking for is 68000 extra passengers making new journies, a slightly more difficult requirement. What proportion of your potential users are already travelling by another route, or have already travelled earlier? And because the route is joint ticketed with LU as far as Finsbury Park, FCC won't get all the revenue anyway... Paul |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:25:40 +0100, asdf
wrote: IIRC, for a while the 0200 EUS-MKC on Saturday nights was only a train as far as Watford Junction, where it turned into a bus, but it's now back to being a train throughout. Nope, or not according to the current SS timetable in front of me. It's a bus throughout for the entire timetable period. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Oct, 08:08, Martin Rich wrote:
There is some variation in stopping pattern north of Finsbury Park during the peaks at least: some trains skipping Harringay and Hornsey and a few running non-stop between Finsbury Park and Palmers Green. Still, I can see that longer non-stop runs would be confusing, especially as at present all trains stop at all stations along the Northern City Line. I know this is mainly about the currenty 313 stopping services, but there's a provisional timetable on the FCC site that is showing how the semi-fast inner/outer services may look from May 2008 or December 2008 (definitely the latter, possibly the former). One improvement at peak times is the increase in 12-car formations. http://preview.tinyurl.com/3aduw9 This will rely on FCC securing and refreshing the four or five 321s they intend to get. Also, the TL side will be getting nearly 30 Class 377s to improve their services, which could also happen by December 2008 (just as they'll have got ALL of the remaining 319s from Southern!). Expect some changes on that side too. Jonathan |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 Oct, 21:42, "Clive D. W. Feather" cl...@on-the-
train.demon.co.uk wrote: In article , Mark Brader writes How much time does that save over running in service? 12.5 minutes. [Moorgate to WGC: 46 minutes in service, 33.5 minutes ECS.] What if they ran back in service, but nonstop? I suspect the number of passengers wanting to go end-to-end contra-peak is tiny compared with the confusion caused by having just two or three non-stop services in an otherwise clockface timetable. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: In the morning peak three services start from Gordon Hill (last station in Greater London, I think). If this is done in the evening peak then the time difference between an ECS from Hertford and an in- service train from Gordon Hill is zero. Only problem is then for Cuffley and Hertford North passengers (Crews Hill is skipped by one in three trains in the peak anyway). Not as big a deal as they would only be down to four an hour. IMHO the problem within Londonstems from running too many trains through to Stevenage & Letchworth. Stevenage is fair enough, but better connections from their to Letchworth branch would save 30 mins per trip. What you're all missing here is that people do use contra-flow trains to get to work. Nowhere near the same number of people use the contra- flow services, but can you blame them? If you need to get to work and one of the half hourlies is cancelled you're f****d. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Travelwatch on OEPs | London Transport | |||
God Bless Immigration: Military to Commandeer Inner City Schools | London Transport | |||
London TravelWatch criticises cash fare rises in London | London Transport | |||
London Travelwatch forum dead | London Transport |