![]() |
|
One under
On Oct 16, 11:47 pm, Mizter T wrote:
On 16 Oct, 22:43, Paul Corfield wrote: On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:06:15 -0700, alex_t wrote: Does any one know details of "one under" at Holborn (Central Line) today? Was it suicide or somebody fell from the platform? Won't know until tomorrow when I see the Daily Report. The vast majority of one under incidents are non suspicious and are suicide attempts. One acquaintance of mine several years ago had a close working relationship with a team of BTP officers - this acquaintance has repeatedly recounted the advice he was given by a BTP Inspector that one should not stand too close to the platform edge as several people each year get pushed on to the tracks. This doesn't fit in with anything else I've ever heard so I've pretty much dismissed it as inaccurate, my acquaintance's memory of this advice perhaps being somewhat faulty or muddled up with a specific incident or two. Nonetheless this piece of third-hand advice has stuck in my head. There have indeed been a very small number of incidents where passengers have been intentionally pushed on to the tracks, but they are as I understand it very limited in number and always make the news. I was in that train and heard the screams - the first one was very loud, which makes me think it was the jumping person... Oh dear - not good. Never experienced that. By the way, my best wishes to the driver! I can only imagine what emotional state he is now. He was clearly shaken, but started informing passengers about evacuation almost immediately, etc. There is a good system of support for drivers who've experienced a one under. The sentiment is appreciated though. You might wish to consider dropping an E Mail through the customer services centre to say you thought the driver did well in the circumstances. I was at Leicester Square station last year when there was a one-under somewhere along the Charing X branch and services were suspended. I also noted the somewhat absurd usage of the phrase "Due to a *customer* under a train [etc]..." - customer is definitely the wrong word to be used in this context. I left the station to make a mobile phone call and on returning (to get the Picc line) the announcement had been changed to "...a *passenger* under a train..." - a bit better, but nonetheless still the wrong word. I wasn't quite sure why the stock phrase "...person under a train..." wasn't used - which is the best way of phrasing it I reckon. I still find it a bit haunting to hear though. Is "passenger action" ever used as a euphemism for one-unders too, or would that be more likely to indicate the emergency stop button being pressed on a train (because a person had been taken ill etc)? P.S. Still don't understand though why Piccadilly station had to be closed as well. I assume you mean the Picc Line at Holborn. Standard practice to allow the emergency services and coroner / undertakers full and unimpeded access so they fulfill their duties. One last question - and this is a difficult one to phrase sensitively, so I'm sorry if people consider it a bit out of order. I was once told that a number of people who jump in fact survive, albeit having got fairly mangled - possibly having been extracted from under the train having had the bulk of the carriage unscrewed from the chassis (wrong terms to use I'm sure). Is there any truth in any of this? I have to say that I have great respect for those that deal with the effects of one unders. I once saw several firefighters emerge from a tube station having dealt with an incident, and they all looked pretty shaken by it. There have been a fair few one unders this month already. I think the Northern also had one in the same area on Monday. A number of people do indeed survive, with the train being jacked up or shoe gear removed to aid their removal. Tubeline's ERU have specialist lifting gear where as the LFB will usually just get stuck in and cut bits off. Some people deal with the after affects in different ways, but at the time of dealing/managing the incidents like this many personal feelings do tend to be put at the back of your mind. You don't know what you'll do until it happens, so far I havent been on the ground for one. |
One under
Mizter T wrote:
Is "passenger action" ever used as a euphemism for one-unders too, or Yes. Once when I heard it I assumed they meant someone had pulled an alarm, and things would get back to normal shortly, but it turned out someone had pushed someone else off a platform. -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
One under
At 23:22:27 on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 Steve M opined:-
Paul Corfield wrote: On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:06:15 -0700, alex_t wrote: Does any one know details of "one under" at Holborn (Central Line) today? Was it suicide or somebody fell from the platform? Won't know until tomorrow when I see the Daily Report. The vast majority of one under incidents are non suspicious and are suicide attempts. Not a good day today, as there was also a one under at Tooting (Broadway?) this morning. Bec, according to the announcement I heard. -- Thoss E-mail address usenetatamoladdotorgdotuk |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:50 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk