Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius strip. Whose job is it to decide which signs go where? Is it a pay-peanuts-get-monkeys job, or has the chap got some qualification? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Rowland" wrote in message ... I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius strip. Don't know the road myself - is it physically possible to drive in one end and out of the other? Perhaps it means that you are only permitted to do this if making a delivery or visiting a resident. Difficult to enforce though. -- David |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:23:55 -0000, John Rowland put finger to
keyboard and typed: I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius strip. That's not entirely stupid. Assuming you have something like this: | | A ------------------B----------------C | | where the lines are roads, then if the section B-C is "no vehicles except for access", then at junction A it would be entirely true to say that A-B is "no through road except for access", and at junction A would be the sign you describe. A typical situation where this might occur is where the section A-B is a normal-sized road, suitable for all traffic, but between B and C it becomes extremely narrow and/or twisty. Another situation would be where B-C runs through a housing estate but A-B serves an industrial estate just on the A side of B, and the authorities want to exclude industrial estate traffic from the housing estate - forcing it to use access A at all times - while still permitting residents of the housing estate to enter and leave via either A or C. Mark -- Blog: http://Mark.Goodge.co.uk Photos: http://www.goodge.co.uk "Emotions run deep as oceans" |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius strip. According to Streetmap, when going west along Knapp Road, just after the railway bridge, the road becomes Cantrell Road, but there's a line across the road suggesting some sort of access restriction. Similarly at the other end of Cantrell Road, where it meets Bow Common Lane, there is another line across it. So I assume that Cantrell Road is effectively pedestrianised except for access, with either some sort of restricted-access barrier at each end or just No Motor Vehicles signs with "except for access" plates. If so, the No Through Road Except for Access sign is reasonably logical, except that the only qualifying plate allowed on a No Through Road sign is "except cycles". So it's either an unlawful sign or has special permission from the DfT. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Morgan" wrote in message ... "John Rowland" wrote in message ... I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius strip. Don't know the road myself - is it physically possible to drive in one end and out of the other? Perhaps it means that you are only permitted to do this if making a delivery or visiting a resident. I know of some roads like this. IIRC they aren't posted as a normal no through roads, but have signs that make the exact rule clear. Difficult to enforce though. They just sit a plod at each end when they have nothing better to do. tim |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Morgan wrote:
"John Rowland" wrote in message ... I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius strip. Don't know the road myself - is it physically possible to drive in one end and out of the other? Perhaps it means that you are only permitted to do this if making a delivery or visiting a resident. Difficult to enforce though. http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&hl=en&time=&date=&ttype=&q=Knapp+Rd,+Towe r+Hamlets,+London+E3,+United+Kingdom&sll=51.994087 ,-0.734502&sspn=0.079803,0.160675&ie=UTF8&cd=2&geoco de=0,51.521758,-0.020599&ll=51.521441,-0.020792&spn=0.01008,0.020084&z=16&om=1 Or: http://tinyurl.com/37fq6x Look at it in satellite mode at highest resolution. It looks as though it should be a through route. If it's not, it must have been artificially blocked with some of those concrete blocks the council committee chairman's brother sells (allegedly). |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 14, 10:40 pm, "Richard J." wrote:
John Rowland wrote: I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius strip. According to Streetmap, when going west along Knapp Road, just after the railway bridge, the road becomes Cantrell Road, but there's a line across the road suggesting some sort of access restriction. Similarly at the other end of Cantrell Road, where it meets Bow Common Lane, there is another line across it. So I assume that Cantrell Road is effectively pedestrianised except for access, with either some sort of restricted-access barrier at each end or just No Motor Vehicles signs with "except for access" plates. If so, the No Through Road Except for Access sign is reasonably logical, except that the only qualifying plate allowed on a No Through Road sign is "except cycles". So it's either an unlawful sign or has special permission from the DfT. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) I think it must be a mistake since the DfT usually grant special authorisation for variation of signs only if there is no existing authorised sign or marking for the desired meaning. The correct sign for this purpose would be the No Motor Vehicles (or no vehicles) signs with 'except for access' plates. Or, if the width of the road is the issue, "unsuitable for wide vehicles" could be used. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
umpston wrote:
On Nov 14, 10:40 pm, "Richard J." wrote: John Rowland wrote: I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius strip. According to Streetmap, when going west along Knapp Road, just after the railway bridge, the road becomes Cantrell Road, but there's a line across the road suggesting some sort of access restriction. Similarly at the other end of Cantrell Road, where it meets Bow Common Lane, there is another line across it. So I assume that Cantrell Road is effectively pedestrianised except for access, with either some sort of restricted-access barrier at each end or just No Motor Vehicles signs with "except for access" plates. If so, the No Through Road Except for Access sign is reasonably logical, except that the only qualifying plate allowed on a No Through Road sign is "except cycles". So it's either an unlawful sign or has special permission from the DfT. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) I think it must be a mistake since the DfT usually grant special authorisation for variation of signs only if there is no existing authorised sign or marking for the desired meaning. The correct sign for this purpose would be the No Motor Vehicles (or no vehicles) signs with 'except for access' plates. Or, if the width of the road is the issue, "unsuitable for wide vehicles" could be used. "No Motor Vehicles except for access" would be correct at the western end of Knapp Road where the restriction starts, but not at the other end, where just an advance warning is needed. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 14, 9:23 pm, "John Rowland"
wrote: I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius strip. Whose job is it to decide which signs go where? Is it a pay-peanuts-get-monkeys job, or has the chap got some qualification? What happens if you do an AA route search from one end to the other? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LU end-to-end journey data | London Transport | |||
Dead Oyster cards | London Transport | |||
Harrow: unusual taxi, the LU-owned market and the dead gasworks branch | London Transport | |||
Fake dead ends | London Transport | |||
Fake dead ends | London Transport |