![]() |
Euston - Northern Line (City Branch)
Anyone know if there is any reason behind a distinct lack of Northern Line
trains northbound to Edgware from the City Branch at Euston? (at least I think it's the City branch - will double check the platform number tomorrow) From last week certainly around 7:40am, there has been no Edgware branch train indicated for at least 15 mins when I've come off the Victoria Line southbound. No major hassle as I just get the first High Barnet train and change to the Edgware branch at Camden Town, but it's starting to annoy me now. Don't recall seeing any posters or info from TfL and what info I have seen has been weekend work mostly and affecting the Bank / High Barnet Branch (actually quicker to do this than get to the other platform at Euston) Nicola |
Euston - Northern Line (City Branch)
On 5 Feb, 18:46, "Nicola Redwood" nicolaexternal-
wrote: Anyone know if there is any reason behind a distinct lack of Northern Line trains northbound to Edgware from the City Branch at Euston? (at least I think it's the City branch - will double check the platform number tomorrow) From last week certainly around 7:40am, there has been no Edgware branch train indicated for at least 15 mins when I've come off the Victoria Line southbound. No major hassle as I just get the first High Barnet train and change to the Edgware branch at Camden Town, but it's starting to annoy me now. Don't recall seeing any posters or info from TfL and what info I have seen has been weekend work mostly and affecting the Bank / High Barnet Branch (actually quicker to do this than get to the other platform at Euston) Nicola There have been signs at London Bridge stating that all trains in the morning peak from the Bank branch will go to High Barnet. So you do have to change at Camden Town. |
Euston - Northern Line (City Branch)
On 5 Feb, 18:46, "Nicola Redwood" nicolaexternal-
wrote: Don't recall seeing any posters or info from TfL and what info I have seen has been weekend work mostly and affecting the Bank / High Barnet Branch (actually quicker to do this than get to the other platform at Euston) I've seen a couple of posters about it. Starting last Monday, all City branch trains go to High Barnet during morning rush hour. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
Euston - Northern Line (City Branch)
I think there was a new timetable brought in and thats prob changed the
routing of some trains at various times. |
Euston - Northern Line (City Branch)
In message of Tue, 5 Feb
2008 19:40:06 in uk.transport.london, Frank Incense writes I think there was a new timetable brought in and thats prob changed the routing of some trains at various times. Somewhere other than on the Northern line this morning, I heard platform PA reporting no Edgware service on the Northern line Bank branch. I find it irritating that LU refers to the Bank branch everywhere, other than at Euston, where they refer to the City branch. I dislike the double nomenclature. The following from the journey planner showing through trains suggests there may have been a timetable change. Departing: Wednesday 06 February 2008 at: 08:00 From: King's Cross St.Pancras Underground Station To: Chalk Farm Restrictions: Route Depart Arrive Duration 1 08:49 09:00 00:11 change 2 08:54 09:02 00:08 through 3 09:20 09:29 00:09 through 4 10:19 10:26 00:07 through I requested "Routes with the fewest changes". At Moorgate, just after 06.30, the only two trains displayed had High Barnet destinations. -- Walter Briscoe |
Euston - Northern Line (City Branch)
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Nicola Redwood wrote:
Anyone know if there is any reason behind a distinct lack of Northern Line trains northbound to Edgware from the City Branch at Euston? Yes. It's due to a lack of Northern line trains northbound to Edgware on the City branch at King's Cross. HTH. :) tom -- Baby got a masterplan. A foolproof masterplan. |
Euston - Northern Line (City Branch)
In article ,
Walter Briscoe wrote: I find it irritating that LU refers to the Bank branch everywhere, other than at Euston, where they refer to the City branch. I dislike the double nomenclature. Surely not as irritating as the fictional "Camden Town, Bank Branch" and "Camden Town, Charing Cross Branch" which I keep hearing about. Yes, arranging it so that the southbound split at Camden happened north of the station would have been a far better arrangement, but that didn't happen. What's wrong with just saying, "This train is for Morden, via Bank", or whatever? If Mornington Crescent closed again, would we suddenly start hearing about the "Edgware Branch" and "High Barnet Branch" at Euston? |
Euston - Northern Line (City Branch)
At 12:30:45 on Wed, 6 Feb 2008 Sarah Brown opined:-
In article , Walter Briscoe wrote: I find it irritating that LU refers to the Bank branch everywhere, other than at Euston, where they refer to the City branch. I dislike the double nomenclature. Surely not as irritating as the fictional "Camden Town, Bank Branch" and "Camden Town, Charing Cross Branch" which I keep hearing about. Maybe they should split the Northern into two notionally separate lines, Northern Bank Line and Northern Charing Cross Line. -- Thoss |
Euston - Northern Line (City Branch)
In article ,
thoss wrote: Maybe they should split the Northern into two notionally separate lines, Northern Bank Line and Northern Charing Cross Line. I think that this is likely when the branches are split (ie, all Charing X trains go to Edgeware and all Bank trains go to to Edgeware. Or the other way round). -- Shenanigans! Shenanigans! Best of 3! -- Flash |
Euston - Northern Line (City Branch)
Maybe they should split the Northern into two notionally separate lines,
Northern Bank Line and Northern Charing Cross Line. That's exactly what TfL want to do. Quote Wikipedia: " TfL's Transport 2025 - Transport vision for a growing world [4] confirms their ambition to split the Northern line into two segregated routes. Running trains between all combinations of branches, as is currently done, means only 22-25 trains per hour can run on each of the central sections, because merging trains have to wait for each other at the junctions. Segregating the routes will allow 30 trains per hour on all parts of the system. However, Camden Town tube station would need to be rebuilt before this could be implemented, as the current station would not be able to cope with the increased number of passengers changing trains there. LUL have however had problems gaining bureaucratic approval of redevelopment plans[5]. " |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk