Drivers pleasure
 

Do drivers get pleasure from closing the doors and preventing people from
getting on?....I think the answer is yes. I reckon they time it perfectly.

Drivers pleasure
 

In message ,
writes
Do drivers get pleasure from closing the doors and preventing people from
getting on?....I think the answer is yes. I reckon they time it perfectly.


Yep, first for the next one... ;-)
--
Kenny

Drivers pleasure
 

Drivers pleasure
 

Richard J. wrote:
wrote:
Do drivers get pleasure from closing the doors and preventing people
from getting on?....I think the answer is yes. I reckon they time it
perfectly.

In the peaks, if it means that the train runs to time and the following ones
are not delayed, then that's the right thing to do, as it benefits most
passengers. Yes, drivers should certainly be pleased to achieve that.

Yep got the bugger, it's even better if they trap a bag or laptop,
that's the only thing that I can really say I've actually achieved in a
shift

Drivers pleasure
 

wrote in message
...

Do drivers get pleasure from closing the doors and preventing people
from getting on?

Not as much as Northern Line drivers get from closing the doors of a
Charing Cross train at Kennington just as we're getting off a Bank one and
trying to change! Miserable *******s.

Ian

Drivers pleasure
 

"Ian F." wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...

Do drivers get pleasure from closing the doors and preventing people from
getting on?

Not as much as Northern Line drivers get from closing the doors of a
Charing Cross train at Kennington just as we're getting off a Bank one and
trying to change! Miserable *******s.

Do you think that they know?

tim

Drivers pleasure
 

"tim (not at home)" wrote in message
...

Do you think that they know?

Certainly. They can see/hear the train coming in on the opposite platform
and know dozens of people will want to change. So they pull off just in
time to make us wait for the next one!

Ian
(waits for someone to start going on about timetables - as if the Northern
Line ever sticks to one!) ;-)

Drivers pleasure
 

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:10:35 -0000, "Ian F."
wrote this gibberish:

"tim (not at home)" wrote in message
...

Do you think that they know?

Certainly. They can see/hear the train coming in on the opposite platform
and know dozens of people will want to change. So they pull off just in
time to make us wait for the next one!

Ian
(waits for someone to start going on about timetables - as if the Northern
Line ever sticks to one!) ;-)


the northern line has a timetable?

;)

--
Mark.
www.MarkVarleyPhoto.co.uk
www.TwistedPhotography.co.uk
www.TwistedArts.co.uk
www.BeautifulBondage.net

Drivers pleasure
 

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:02:27 GMT, "Richard J."
wrote:

wrote:
Do drivers get pleasure from closing the doors and preventing people
from getting on?....I think the answer is yes. I reckon they time it
perfectly.

In the peaks, if it means that the train runs to time and the following ones
are not delayed, then that's the right thing to do, as it benefits most
passengers. Yes, drivers should certainly be pleased to achieve that.

No, they should be unhappy about being told to be rude to their
customers In any case, isn't it quicker overall to let passengers
board and so make the platfomr clearer for disembarkers from following
trains?

Richard J.
(to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address)



--
Peter Lawrence

Drivers pleasure
 

On Mar 11, 6:07 pm, "Peter Lawrence" wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:02:27 GMT, "Richard J."

wrote:
wrote:
Do drivers get pleasure from closing the doors and preventing people
from getting on?....I think the answer is yes. I reckon they time it
perfectly.

In the peaks, if it means that the train runs to time and the following ones
are not delayed, then that's the right thing to do, as it benefits most
passengers. Yes, drivers should certainly be pleased to achieve that.

No, they should be unhappy about being told to be rude to their
customers In any case, isn't it quicker overall to let passengers
board and so make the platfomr clearer for disembarkers from following
trains?

Essentially you are saying that, at very busy stations like Victoria,
every train should only leave the platform when it is full.

Drivers pleasure
 

On 11 Mar, 18:07, "Peter Lawrence" wrote:
No, they should be unhappy about being told to be rude to their
customers

Depends which customers - waiting for one person to board
inconveniences all the ones already on the train trying to get
somewhere. Drivers regularly waiting for every last customer is one of
the remaining bad things about bus travel.

*In any case, isn't it quicker overall *to let *passengers
board and so make the platfomr clearer for disembarkers from following
trains?

No, since the platform is likely to fill up again anyway. On a high
frequency service, getting a few more trains through is going to be
better for capacity than making sure each one picks up every last
passenger.

U

--
http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/
A blog about transport projects in London

Drivers pleasure
 

Mr Thant wrote:
On 11 Mar, 18:07, "Peter Lawrence" wrote:
No, they should be unhappy about being told to be rude to their
customers

Depends which customers - waiting for one person to board
inconveniences all the ones already on the train trying to get
somewhere. Drivers regularly waiting for every last customer is one of
the remaining bad things about bus travel.

In any case, isn't it quicker overall to let passengers
board and so make the platfomr clearer for disembarkers from
following trains?

No, since the platform is likely to fill up again anyway. On a high
frequency service, getting a few more trains through is going to be
better for capacity than making sure each one picks up every last
passenger.


People will have to get used to mainline trains leaving pax on the platform
as well, because its the only way the planned frequencies on the likes of
Crossrail and Thameslink are going to be achieved...

Paul S

Drivers pleasure
 

"Ian F." wrote in message
...
"tim (not at home)" wrote in message
...

Do you think that they know?

Certainly. They can see/hear the train coming in on the opposite platform
and know dozens of people will want to change. So they pull off just in
time to make us wait for the next one!


I have seen that happen at Finchley Road with a Metropolitan Line train. The
train was in the station and the holding light indicated that a Jubilee Line
train was approaching.

Just as the latter stopped and opened its doors, the Metropolitan Line train
closed its doors.

Aren't drivers required to hold in the station as long as the holding light
is lit?

I also wonder how many holding lights there are on LUL -- the only two that
I have seen are at the westbound platform at Mile End and the westbound
platform at Finchely Road.

Are there any others?

Drivers pleasure
 

On 11 Mar, 20:57, wrote:
Aren't drivers required to hold in the station as long as the holding light
is lit?

I'm sure at their discretion. If it was an Aldgate train, they're
quite tightly timetabled for when they can reach the Circle Line
junction, so he'd have a good reason not to wait.

U

--
http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/
A blog about transport projects in London

Drivers pleasure
 

"Mr Thant" wrote in message
...

I'm sure at their discretion.

I visited New York a few years ago, where the underground there also uses
holding lights. The message is very clear when they are switched on: Hold
and don't move until the lights go out.

Drivers pleasure
 

Drivers pleasure
 

"Richard J." wrote in message
m...
wrote:

I also wonder how many holding lights there are on LUL -- the only
two that I have seen are at the westbound platform at Mile End and
the westbound platform at Finchely Road.

Are there any others?

I've never heard of these before. Are they just lights or do they have
any text? What colour are they?
--

There is a sign mounted at the end of the westbound platform at Mile End. It
lights up when a Central Line train approaches, and I believe it says Train
Approaching, or something like that. It's mounted rather high up, but has no
real colour to it.

The holding light at Finchely Road looks similar to a tripcock testing
signal, only it displays the letter J when lit. It's located almost next to
the starter and is at about eye level.

Are either of those holding lights controlled from somewhere or do they
automatically light up when a train approaches?

Drivers pleasure
 

On 12 Mar, 00:21, wrote:

"Richard J." wrote:

wrote:

I also wonder how many holding lights there are on LUL -- the only
two that I have seen are at the westbound platform at Mile End and
the westbound platform at Finchely Road.

Are there any others?

I've never heard of these before. Are they just lights or do they have
any text? What colour are they?


There is a sign mounted at the end of the westbound platform at Mile End. It
lights up when a Central Line train approaches, and I believe it says Train
Approaching, or something like that. It's mounted rather high up, but has no
real colour to it.

The holding light at Finchley Road looks similar to a tripcock testing
signal, only it displays the letter J when lit. It's located almost next to
the starter and is at about eye level.

Are either of those holding lights controlled from somewhere or do they
automatically light up when a train approaches?


I'm pretty certain they are merely automatic indicators. At peak times
the timetabling is tight, and anyway passengers won't have very long
to wait for the next train. Keeping to the timetable is the best way
of being courteous and considerate to the greatest number of people.

Drivers pleasure
 

On 12 Mar, 00:21, wrote:
There is a sign mounted at the end of the westbound platform at Mile End. It
lights up when a Central Line train approaches, and I believe it says Train
Approaching, or something like that. It's mounted rather high up, but has no
real colour to it.

The holding light at Finchely Road looks similar to a tripcock testing
signal, only it displays the letter J when lit. It's located almost next to
the starter and is at about eye level.

Are either of those holding lights controlled from somewhere or do they
automatically light up when a train approaches?

The District Dave thread on the topic is pretty comprehensive:
http://districtdave.proboards39.com/...d =1186751545

It gives the impression they're automatic and purely informative, and
only installed in places where the driver can't see the other train.

U

--
http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/
A blog about transport projects in London

Drivers pleasure
 

On 11 Mar, 18:47, Offramp wrote:

On Mar 11, 6:07 pm, "Peter Lawrence" wrote:

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:02:27 GMT, "Richard J."
wrote:

wrote:
Do drivers get pleasure from closing the doors and preventing people
from getting on?....I think the answer is yes. I reckon they time it
perfectly.

In the peaks, if it means that the train runs to time and the following ones
are not delayed, then that's the right thing to do, as it benefits most
passengers. Yes, drivers should certainly be pleased to achieve that.

No, they should be unhappy about being told to be rude to their
customers In any case, isn't it quicker overall to let passengers
board and so make the platfomr clearer for disembarkers from following
trains?

Essentially you are saying that, at very busy stations like Victoria,
every train should only leave the platform when it is full.


Indeed - at many places the platform will never be clear, the torrent
of passengers is unending.

I find it bizarre to see people who get in a massive rage just because
they've just missed a train and have to wait a couple of minutes for
the next one. Get some perspective!

Drivers pleasure
 

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Paul Scott wrote:

Mr Thant wrote:
On 11 Mar, 18:07, "Peter Lawrence" wrote:
No, they should be unhappy about being told to be rude to their
customers

Depends which customers - waiting for one person to board
inconveniences all the ones already on the train trying to get
somewhere. Drivers regularly waiting for every last customer is one of
the remaining bad things about bus travel.

In any case, isn't it quicker overall to let passengers
board and so make the platfomr clearer for disembarkers from
following trains?

No, since the platform is likely to fill up again anyway. On a high
frequency service, getting a few more trains through is going to be
better for capacity than making sure each one picks up every last
passenger.

People will have to get used to mainline trains leaving pax on the platform
as well, because its the only way the planned frequencies on the likes of
Crossrail and Thameslink are going to be achieved...

Random though, but what we need is train doors that swing outward rather
than sliding. It'd clear a space on the platform for people to alight, and
might make that currently utterly infuriating step a little quicker.

tom

--
Judge Dredd. Found dead. Face down in Snoopy's bed.

Drivers pleasure
 

On 12 Mar, 12:43, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Paul Scott wrote:
Mr Thant wrote:
On 11 Mar, 18:07, "Peter Lawrence" wrote:
No, they should be unhappy about being told to be rude to their
customers

Depends which customers - waiting for one person to board
inconveniences all the ones already on the train trying to get
somewhere. Drivers regularly waiting for every last customer is one of
the remaining bad things about bus travel.

In any case, isn't it quicker overall to let passengers
board and so make the platfomr clearer for disembarkers from
following trains?

No, since the platform is likely to fill up again anyway. On a high
frequency service, getting a few more trains through is going to be
better for capacity than making sure each one picks up every last
passenger.

People will have to get used to mainline trains leaving pax on the platform
as well, because its the only way the planned frequencies on the likes of
Crossrail and Thameslink are going to be achieved...

Random though, but what we need is train doors that swing outward rather
than sliding. It'd clear a space on the platform for people to alight, and
might make that currently utterly infuriating step a little quicker.

Surely the ideal way to increase capacity is to shut out the
passengers at the station entrances. Letting them on to the platform
and then shutting the doors on them is typical British dithering.

Drivers pleasure
 

"Mr Thant" wrote in message
...

The District Dave thread on the topic is pretty comprehensive:
http://districtdave.proboards39.com/...d =1186751545

It gives the impression they're automatic and purely informative, and
only installed in places where the driver can't see the other train.

Interesting thread, I didn't know that there were holding lights at Wembley
Park as well.

I'm surprised that there are no holding lights on the Victoria Line,
considering that it was designed specifically to allow easy cross platform
transfers. But I guess the tightness of schedules and the intervals don't
allow for that.