![]() |
Door open buttons on London Underground
Surely
if continental types can learn to push a button, then so can Londoners. My experience of using the overgound (North London Line) with buttons to push suggests a significant proportion of travellers on trains around here have "special needs" in the learning to push buttons curriculum. -- Robin |
Door open buttons on London Underground
Central line 92 stock has door-close buttons, although in common with
other lines as described by others, they haven't been operational for a number of years. |
Door open buttons on London Underground
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Tristan Miller wrote:
In article , James Farrar wrote: On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:15:19 +0100, Tom Anderson wrote: On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Tristan Miller wrote: What is the purpose of the "open" buttons on the doors of the London Underground carriages? On every Underground train I've used, the doors open automatically at every station. Is/was there a time or place where they don't open automatically and the buttons must be used? I have heard two possible explanations: one (as you stated) being that passengers were confused; the other being that there were fears of passengers using close-door buttons to close the doors on other passengers. Neither of these explanations seems particularly satisfying. I've used plenty of public transport systems in Europe where it was necessary to push a button (or even pull a handle!) to open the carriage door. Surely if continental types can learn to push a button, then so can Londoners. Do you have to use the open button at all stations, or are there some stations where the driver opens all the doors automatically? If not, then these systems are using the same principle as NR trains here, which Londoners do seem to manage to use without too much difficulty. If they do, then it does seem that continentals are cleverer than Londoners. This is where the problem arose here - in some stations, the driver would open the doors, so there was no point pushing the buttons. In some, he wouldn't, so passengers would have to push the button. This is where confusion sets in, because if the door in front of you isn't open, you can never be sure if it's the driver being tardy opening it, in which case you should wait, or a station where he's not going to, in which case you should push the button. This is where the little light on the button comes in - it means "you need to push me to open the door", but this was perhaps not clear enough for the tired commuting brain to reliably handle. tom -- BUTTS LOL |
Door open buttons on London Underground
On Apr 5, 12:20*pm, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Tristan Miller wrote: In article , James Farrar wrote: On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:15:19 +0100, Tom Anderson wrote: On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Tristan Miller wrote: What is the purpose of the "open" buttons on the doors of the London Underground carriages? *On every Underground train I've used, the doors open automatically at every station. *Is/was there a time or place where they don't open automatically and the buttons must be used? I have heard two possible explanations: one (as you stated) being that passengers were confused; the other being that there were fears of passengers using close-door buttons to close the doors on other passengers. Neither of these explanations seems particularly satisfying. *I've used plenty of public transport systems in Europe where it was necessary to push a button (or even pull a handle!) to open the carriage door. *Surely if continental types can learn to push a button, then so can Londoners. Do you have to use the open button at all stations, or are there some stations where the driver opens all the doors automatically? If not, then these systems are using the same principle as NR trains here, which Londoners do seem to manage to use without too much difficulty. If they do, then it does seem that continentals are cleverer than Londoners. This is where the problem arose here - in some stations, the driver would open the doors, so there was no point pushing the buttons. In some, he wouldn't, so passengers would have to push the button. This is where confusion sets in, because if the door in front of you isn't open, you can never be sure if it's the driver being tardy opening it, in which case you should wait, or a station where he's not going to, in which case you should push the button. This is where the little light on the button comes in - it means "you need to push me to open the door", but this was perhaps not clear enough for the tired commuting brain to reliably handle. The ceasing of using open buttons on LU seemed to coincide with the installation of platform-edge doors on the Jubilee extension. Certainly on the rest of the Jubilee, rapidly followed by the rest. |
Door open buttons on London Underground
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 02:18:37 +0100, John Rowland wrote:
The air-conditioned S stock will have doors that automatically close if the train stands in a station too long, to keep the cold air in, and it'll have working door open buttons to get them open again. Maybe they should have revolving doors on the trains. I was once on a crush loaded tube train which pulled into a busy station, but no-one wanted to board at our particular door, so the outside button was not pushed. The people inside all had our backs crushed against the curved door, and when we realised that the door wasn't opening, no-one could work out where the door button was. Extra door buttons on the ceiling would solve the problem, or sensors which automatically open [unlocked] doors if the carriage is crowded. Or just having the driver open all the doors at busy stations/times. (This would save time anyway as it would avoid the delay between the driver releasing the doors and a passenger pressing the button.) |
Door open buttons on London Underground
|
Door open buttons on London Underground
On Apr 5, 3:05*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote: "Colin Rosenstiel" wrote in message .co.uk... In article , (asdf) wrote: Or just having the driver open all the doors at busy stations/times. (This would save time anyway as it would avoid the delay between the driver releasing the doors and a passenger pressing the button.) This makes me ask why some NR stock, e.g. Class 365 networkers, will open the doors immediately after the driver door release if someone is pressing the button while newer stock, e.g. Turbostars, Electrostars and Desiros, not only seem to take longer for the drivers to operate the door releases in the first place but also will not open the door if the button is pressed; you have to release it and press again after the door release. The differences in station dwell times on GN and SWT are horrendous. SWT Desiro doors are released by the guard, but only after he has released his own door and looked down the platform... *Not exactly the fastest operating routine I should think... I'm also fairly sure that plug doors on Networkers are actually faster- moving than the sliding doors on 376s. The Desiro doors are so slow that they alone must add to the dwell time. |
Door open buttons on London Underground
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:43:34PM +0100, James Farrar wrote:
the other being that there were fears of passengers using close-door buttons to close the doors on other passengers. Right, cos drivers never do that. -- David Cantrell | Hero of the Information Age fdisk format reinstall, doo-dah, doo-dah; fdisk format reinstall, it's the Windows way |
Door open buttons on London Underground
On 7 Apr, 12:08, David Cantrell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:43:34PM +0100, James Farrar wrote: * * * * * * * * * * * *the other being that there were fears of passengers using close-door buttons to close the doors on other passengers. Right, cos drivers never do that. Drivers certainly do, but in those days there weren't bleepers when passengers closed the doors, so the risks were a bit higher. (I accidentally leant on a button in a crowded 465 and closed the door bleeplessly on someone. For what very limited use they have, it would be better if they weren't there.) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk