Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The news item on BBC Breakfast at around 0700 was that the DLR was
suspended at the southern end due to a broken down train, making it sound like something that would soon be shifted (for those thinking of using the DLR later in the day). This afteroon I tried 020 7222 1234, press 3 for DLR service updates, and it reported nothing other than escalator work at Bank and no lift at Heron Quays. In the real world, the service was suspended due to a derailment and there was a replacement bus in operation. This is likely to last into the weekend. Not the best provision of information really. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Apparently DLR staff have been a bit cagey about it all day. Reminds
me of when a bit of the platform fell off at Mudchute on marathon day last year suspending all services south of Crossharbour on the DLR's most important day of the year. I'd heard today that a train had hit an 'object' though they said it wasn't vandalism or terrorism. Has a train scraped the platform again? If so I wonder if there's an inherant design fault? Police were at the scene in the morning but they weren't there all day suggesting it wasn't a crime scene. I noticed that the TFL website seemed to be in denial of any problem for much of the day but the Live Departure Boards seemed really bizarre as the ones at Mudchute and Bank showed every other train as terminating at Pontoon Dock! I have to say I had the best journey ever into work this morning thanks to the incident. Some trains were starting at Mudchute so I was able to get on without fighting for a space and had a choice of seats! Not much fun for those south of the river though. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MIG wrote:
Not the best provision of information really. There was someone under a train at Turnpike Lane this evening. The east bound Piccadilly was suspended for a while as a result. While the driver of one affected train was explaining this for the third time, the 'all services are operating normally' drivel echoed around the platform. The LCD indicator at the surface said 'minor delays'. Within the space of about 20 minutes, the same 'all services blah blah' was heard as I made an alternative route through two other tube stations. According to TfL's website, the problem only cleared around the time that I got home and then 'minor delays' followed. I'd rather have no information than misinformation. ESB |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 4, 11:36*pm, wrote:
Apparently DLR staff have been a bit cagey about it all day. Reminds me of when a bit of the platform fell off at Mudchute on marathon day last year suspending all services south of Crossharbour on the DLR's most important day of the year. I'd heard today that a train had hit an 'object' though they said it wasn't vandalism or terrorism. Has a train scraped the platform again? If so I wonder if there's an inherant design fault? Well, they are so wobbly that it's not surprising that they scrape things. A DLR person told me that the supposedly broken down train had "come off the tracks". Units 87 and 62 seemed to be stuck on the viaduct adjacent to Creekside, but I can't say that they looked particularly wonky. If it had scraped the platform, it would have had to restart from the station having done so to get where it was. Police were at the scene in the morning but they weren't there all day suggesting it wasn't a crime scene. It's not an obvious location for "vandalism" related objects on the line, that's for sure. By the evening there were a lot of orange people sitting on the platform at Deptford Bridge, but no one visible near the train. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 4 Apr, 23:36, wrote: Apparently DLR staff have been a bit cagey about it all day. [...] Variously described by the DLR staff I asked as a derailment, a power problem, a failed train and "just an incident, I don't know anything more than that". I got myself caught up in this yesterday as I basically had had a free day and was out and about in the Docklands, I'll report back with a bit more about how the service coped with this all (in essence fairly well, but on-the-spot information provision could nonetheless have been a bit better). |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
On 4 Apr, 23:36, wrote: Apparently DLR staff have been a bit cagey about it all day. [...] Variously described by the DLR staff I asked as a derailment, a power problem, a failed train and "just an incident, I don't know anything more than that". The TfL website says that the DLR is suspended between Greenwich and Lewisham "due to an ongoing incident". If it was in fact a derailment, it should have been immediately reported to the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, but it's not (yet) shown in the list of current investigations on the RAIB site. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 5 Apr, 12:00, "Richard J." wrote: Mizter T wrote: On 4 Apr, 23:36, wrote: Apparently DLR staff have been a bit cagey about it all day. [...] Variously described by the DLR staff I asked as a derailment, a power problem, a failed train and "just an incident, I don't know anything more than that". The TfL website says that the DLR is suspended between Greenwich and Lewisham "due to an ongoing incident". If it was in fact a derailment, it should have been immediately reported to the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, but it's not (yet) shown in the list of current investigations on the RAIB site. RAIB were there - I saw a 4x4 vehicle carrying the RAIB logo at Deptford Bridge on Friday morning. RAIB don't appear to update their website immediately after an incident, there is perhaps a gap of a day or two until it gets updated with the latest incidents. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
On 5 Apr, 12:00, "Richard J." wrote: Mizter T wrote: Variously described by the DLR staff I asked as a derailment, a power problem, a failed train and "just an incident, I don't know anything more than that". The TfL website says that the DLR is suspended between Greenwich and Lewisham "due to an ongoing incident". If it was in fact a derailment, it should have been immediately reported to the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, but it's not (yet) shown in the list of current investigations on the RAIB site. RAIB were there - I saw a 4x4 vehicle carrying the RAIB logo at Deptford Bridge on Friday morning. The RAIB have confirmed this morning (13/4) that they are investigating a derailment. "The RAIB is carrying out an investigation into a derailment of a Docklands Light Railway train near Deptford Bridge station on 4 April 2008. At 05:27 hrs on 4 April the 05:19 hrs service from Lewisham had just left Deptford Bridge station, and was travelling towards Greenwich, when it struck an object on the track and was derailed by the second axle of the first bogie. The front of the train came to a rest 88 metres after hitting the object. There were no injuries to the 59 persons on board the train and all were evacuated safely back to Deptford Bridge station. The train, which was the first train of the day from Lewisham, was under automatic operation. The object on the track was found to be a steel drilling template that had been in use during engineering activities the previous night." While it might be thought that manual operation would have been better for the first train after an overnight possession, it would still have been dark at the time of the derailment (sunrise that day in London was at 06:28 BST), so the object might not have been visible anyway. Are there any special precautions taken on the Tube for the first train after overnight engineering work, especially on the lines with ATO (Central, Victoria)? -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Apr, 15:07, "Richard J." wrote:
Are there any special precautions taken on the Tube for the first train after overnight engineering work, especially on the lines with ATO (Central, Victoria)? On the Wuppertal Schwebebahn the first train of the day now runs empty after a similar incident killed 4 people in 1999 (can't remember where I read this). (and Germany's other fatal monorail accident involved a train hitting a left-behind maintenance wagon) U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 13, 3:44*pm, Mr Thant
wrote: On 13 Apr, 15:07, "Richard J." wrote: Are there any special precautions taken on the Tube for the first train after overnight engineering work, especially on the lines with ATO (Central, Victoria)? On the Wuppertal Schwebebahn the first *train of the day now runs empty after a similar incident killed 4 people in 1999 (can't remember where I read this). (and Germany's other fatal monorail accident involved a train hitting a left-behind maintenance wagon) For a few days after (and possibly still, but I haven't been that way) there was a very much more severe than usual speed restriction between Deptford Bridge and Greenwich. I don't know if that's because of track damage or a case of locking the stable door. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Central Line suspension tonight.... | London Transport | |||
RAIB Report into DLR Derailment at Last | London Transport | |||
DLR Derailment Vehicle Back, no RAIB Report | London Transport | |||
Victoria line suspension | London Transport | |||
Detecting a derailment. | London Transport |