![]() |
Lords Cricket Ground disused tunnel
The Times has an article today about a disused tunnel under the 'nursery
end' which is due for development, and has been owned by a third party since being sold by Railtrack 10 years ago. Apparently MCC only own the ground over it. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/spo...cle3716497.ece Were Railtrack really able to make a permanent decision back then that there would be no further rail use? I guess 10 years ago another two platforms at Marylebone weren't on the agenda either... Paul |
Lords Cricket Ground disused tunnel
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/spo...cle3716497.ece "The tunnel, which was part of the Marylebone to Aylesbury train line ..." Cough. |
Lords Cricket Ground disused tunnel
On 10 Apr, 19:37, Mark Annand
wrote: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/spo...cle3716497.ece "The tunnel, which was part of the Marylebone to Aylesbury train line ..." Cough. What was it for? |
Lords Cricket Ground disused tunnel
On 10 Apr, 19:25, "Paul Scott" wrote:
Were Railtrack really able to make a permanent decision back then that there would be no further rail use? *I guess 10 years ago another two platforms at Marylebone weren't on the agenda either... They're on a 999 year lease: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/mai.../sclord110.xml It would appear there are three double track tunnels: http://prints.leics.gov.uk/low.php?xp=media&xm=670835 One is obviously still in use, and the other two must have been for when there was a big freight operation at Marylebone. I can't see any use for them now - you'd need more platforms at Marylebone and a way of four tracking at least to Neasden. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
Lords Cricket Ground disused tunnel
"m1ss_wh1te" wrote in message
... On 10 Apr, 19:37, Mark Annand wrote: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/spo...cle3716497.ece "The tunnel, which was part of the Marylebone to Aylesbury train line ..." Cough. What was it for? Yes I'm not sure what Mark is objecting to, either. Maybe the use of "train line" instead of "railway line". Or maybe the fact that the GCR line originally went much further north than Aylesbury. Or maybe that there are also trains which use those tunnels which go to destinations such as Birmingham via the High Wycombe route. |
Lords Cricket Ground disused tunnel
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:10:01 +0100, Mr Thant wrote
It would appear there are three double track tunnels: http://prints.leics.gov.uk/low.php?xp=media&xm=670835 One is obviously still in use, and the other two must have been for when there was a big freight operation at Marylebone. IIRC the Lords tunnel was never used - or am I mistaken? |
Lords Cricket Ground disused tunnel
On 10 Apr, 20:10, Mr Thant
wrote: On 10 Apr, 19:25, "Paul Scott" wrote: Were Railtrack really able to make a permanent decision back then that there would be no further rail use? I guess 10 years ago another two platforms at Marylebone weren't on the agenda either... They're on a 999 year lease:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/mai...2008/04/10/scl... It would appear there are three double track tunnels:http://prints.leics.gov.uk/low.php?xp=media&xm=670835 One is obviously still in use, and the other two must have been for when there was a big freight operation at Marylebone. I can't see any use for them now - you'd need more platforms at Marylebone and a way of four tracking at least to Neasden. U --http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London Did they ever see trains, or even tracks? I believe that at least one, and possibly two of the tunnel bores was never used, having been built for possible expansion at Marylebone, which never came. |
Lords Cricket Ground disused tunnel
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Mr Thant wrote:
On 10 Apr, 19:25, "Paul Scott" wrote: Were Railtrack really able to make a permanent decision back then that there would be no further rail use? I can't see any use for them now - you'd need more platforms at Marylebone and a way of four tracking at least to Neasden. Yes. Completely random question, but where do the Chiltern and Metropolitan alignments separate? tom -- Freedom, Beauty, Truth, and Love! |
Lords Cricket Ground disused tunnel
On Apr 10, 9:15*pm, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Mr Thant wrote: On 10 Apr, 19:25, "Paul Scott" wrote: Were Railtrack really able to make a permanent decision back then that there would be no further rail use? I can't see any use for them now - you'd need more platforms at Marylebone and a way of four tracking at least to Neasden. Yes. Completely random question, but where do the Chiltern and Metropolitan alignments separate? As far as I can see, they emerge from tunnel under Lodge Road, then cross the canal on separate, slightly diverging bridges, and then go either side of buildings south of the canal. So, roughly where they cross the canal. |
Lords Cricket Ground disused tunnel
On Apr 10, 12:10*pm, Mr Thant
wrote: On 10 Apr, 19:25, "Paul Scott" wrote: Were Railtrack really able to make a permanent decision back then that there would be no further rail use? *I guess 10 years ago another two platforms at Marylebone weren't on the agenda either... They're on a 999 year lease:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/mai...2008/04/10/scl... It would appear there are three double track tunnels:http://prints.leics.gov.uk/low.php?xp=media&xm=670835 IIRC Two were double track tunnels and one was a triple track tunnel. One is obviously still in use, and the other two must have been for when there was a big freight operation at Marylebone. There were once extensive freight facilities at Marylebone. These included transshipment docks for the Regent's Canal. Most of the freight depot is now part of a public housing subdivision. I can't see any use for them now - you'd need more platforms at Marylebone and a way of four tracking at least to Neasden. Marylebone was indented to have 10 platforms. Originally only four were build. U --http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London Great blog! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk