![]() |
Drivers protesting about a film
On 21 Apr, 18:19, Roland Perry wrote:
eg: Cop-shows on TV are staggeringly unrealistic when it comes to police procedure; it's just not funny (if you worry about such things). On the other hand, if you think scene-of-crimes officers double as a swat team, or can read a cctv image of a car numberplate a mile away - keep watching CSI-NewYork without complaining. Have you seen The Wire? In terms of conveying the tedious grind, rubbish equipment and dealing-with-demotivated-incompetents side of police work, it seems to do quite well - at least, better than anything else I've seen. I'm not sure how accurate it is in terms of procedure though... -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Drivers protesting about a film
In message
, at 11:34:45 on Mon, 21 Apr 2008, John B remarked: Have you seen The Wire? Never even heard of it. (I was a bit surprised that I'd only heard of about half the BAFTA winners. Rather than going out, maybe I should stay in more?) -- Roland Perry |
Drivers protesting about a film
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, www.waspies.net wrote:
Boltar wrote: ? Seems some people have nothing better to do with their lives: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle3787873.ece Perhaps soldiers or policemen or doctors or insert any profession you can think of here should protest about any film which shows them in a bad light or shows something distressing related to what they do. As a driver who helps victims of train suicide I think it's very poor of the company to take the 40 pieces of silver for this film to be made on TFL premises If this film really is about suicides on the tube, and someone trying to engineer one, then yes, this is in incredibly poor taste. But here's something from the article: But Crook, best known for playing the character of Gareth in The Office, denied the new comedy about deaths on the London Underground was insensitive. "When I read the premise I thought this might be a touchy subject," he said. "But it soon became obvious that wasn't what the film is about." Crook, who said he was "very proud" of the British-made movie, said he was "disappointed" people had been "jumping to conclusions". "They're imagining we've made a very distasteful, bad-taste film, which we haven't," he said. "Hopefully those people who have objected will go and see it and realise they have got the wrong end of the stick." Which makes it sounds like the union's concerns are misplaced. Do we have any opinions from anyone who's actually seen the film? tom -- In-jokes for out-casts |
Drivers protesting about a film
But Crook, best known for playing the character of Gareth in The Office,
denied the new comedy about deaths on the London Underground was insensitive. "When I read the premise I thought this might be a touchy subject," he said. "But it soon became obvious that wasn't what the film is about." Crook, who said he was "very proud" of the British-made movie, said he was "disappointed" people had been "jumping to conclusions". "They're imagining we've made a very distasteful, bad-taste film, which we haven't," he said. "Hopefully those people who have objected will go and see it and realise they have got the wrong end of the stick." Which makes it sounds like the union's concerns are misplaced. Do we have any opinions from anyone who's actually seen the film? tom -- In-jokes for out-casts If someone's slagging off his bread and butter I would expect him to say something like that. On Jonathon Ross last week he was also rather flippant about the whole thing too. In fact I'm almost certain that he did not even want to do the interview but "had to" just to plug the film. He looked very uncomfortable IMHO. Film itself not out till Fri I believe - although in the News of the screws yest it was given a 1 star rating and basically called a load a crap (its 2hrs too) |
Drivers protesting about a film
On Apr 22, 12:35 am, "Frank Incense" wrote:
Film itself not out till Fri I believe - although in the News of the screws yest it was given a 1 star rating and basically called a load a crap (its 2hrs too) Its a low budget british film. Who would expect it to be any good? Anyway , there have been plenty of possibly potentially bad taste films made on the tube. The was one a few years back which I saw (can't remember the name - tried to google but can't find it) where some driver was killed by a monster living in the tunnels. Didn't notice them protesting about that one. Some people just love to protest, it probably makes them feel important. B2003 |
Drivers protesting about a film
"Boltar" wrote in message news:767b4858-f3c0-4b5c-86dd- Anyway , there have been plenty of possibly potentially bad taste films made on the tube. The was one a few years back which I saw (can't remember the name - tried to google but can't find it) where some driver was killed by a monster living in the tunnels. Didn't notice them protesting about that one. That must have been "CREEP" circa 2004. I cant imagine the RMT allowing drivers to drive trains through tunnels where there are monsters chomping up their drivers! FFS its not real it's a movie! |
Drivers protesting about a film
In message , Walter Briscoe
writes That article has "Keith Norman, general secretary of Aslef (sic) [I believe it ought to be ASLEF standing for Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen]" I always thought it was ASLEF&C, when did they drop the last bit from their name? -- Clive |
Drivers protesting about a film
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:39:58 +0100, Clive
wrote: In message , Walter Briscoe writes That article has "Keith Norman, general secretary of Aslef (sic) [I believe it ought to be ASLEF standing for Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen]" I always thought it was ASLEF&C, when did they drop the last bit from their name? http://www.aslef.org.uk/information/...tory_of_aslef/ gives no mention of any previous name that I can see. What's the C stand for? |
Drivers protesting about a film
In message , James Farrar
writes On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:39:58 +0100, Clive wrote: In message , Walter Briscoe writes That article has "Keith Norman, general secretary of Aslef (sic) [I believe it ought to be ASLEF standing for Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen]" I always thought it was ASLEF&C, when did they drop the last bit from their name? http://www.aslef.org.uk/information/...tory_of_aslef/ gives no mention of any previous name that I can see. What's the C stand for? When I worked on the footplate in the 60s and 70s It was known as the "Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers, Firemen & Cleaners. Hence the name. -- Clive |
Drivers protesting about a film
On Apr 23, 7:24 pm, "Sargeant Rutter" wrote:
That must have been "CREEP" circa 2004. I cant imagine the RMT allowing Yeah , that was the one, B2003 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk