Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Mark Brader wrote:
Mark Brader: What I haven't heard about is the status of the *other* double-deckers, the ones operated only by a driver. Martin Rich: As others have already said, one-person double-deckers remain the commonest type in London. Thanks to Martin and others who have explained this. One effect of the insistence on low-floor buses, whcih have really only been the norm for double-deckers for the last ten years or so... The "low-floor" buses we're now getting in Toronto are only low-floor for about 2/3 of the bus, including both doors. To ride in the back of the bus you have to climb two steps. Same here. At least, on the 210 i rode yesterday. It's low-floor throughout, except for the rearmost bay, where there are two rows of seats facing each other which are up two steps (er, and the top deck). The seats in front of the high-floor section are also a step up to the side from the main low floor. Those seats and the rearward-facing seats sit on top of the wheel arch. I like sitting right at the back, because i can prop my feet up on the wheel arch (not the seat, of course!). tom -- Get a bicycle. You will not regret it. If you live. -- Mark Twain |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Street Types site | London Transport | |||
Bus Use in London Emergency | London Transport | |||
Anyone here use bus route 100 regularly? | London Transport | |||
Service Distribution To Terminal Points | London Transport | |||
Bus stop sign covered and marked 'not in use' and a temporary bus stop sign right next to it | London Transport |