![]() |
|
Stratford - Mind the Gap
http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/news.php?id=592
http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/document/3360/get quote Stratford access needs attention urgently London TravelWatch has written to the Government expressing its deep concerns about the lack of progress on interchange arrangements at Stratford. There are still no satisfactory arrangements between the platforms to be served by the Southeastern High Speed domestic services and Stratford regional services in the period between December 2009 when the high speed service commences and the completion of the work for the Olympics in 2012. Brian Cooke, Chairman, London TravelWatch said: “It is London TravelWatch’s view that it is essential that the Southeastern services call at Stratford from December 2009 to allow passengers to interchange for destinations in the City and Docklands, and that this interchange needs to be welcoming and safe for passengers. If the services do not stop at Stratford, we fear unacceptable levels of crowding on the remaining services into London Bridge and Cannon St and on the Jubilee line.” To achieve this, London TravelWatch believes that an interchange facility needs to be in place by December 2009, which would require the construction of a new bridge from the International station, an entrance to Stratford regional station, and a safe means of transporting passengers between these two sites between, or through, the construction area for 2012. Brian Cooke continued: “As we understand it, until the permanent pedestrian route, the new ticket hall and the Docklands Light Railway extension are in place, a shuttle bus would be needed, but there have been no assurances given by the Olympic Delivery Authority or the contractors that the roadway necessary for this service would be available by December 2009 - this is unacceptable.” London TravelWatch is also concerned that the building of a mechanised link, a requirement in the original Transport and Works Order, has not been enforced. Brian Cooke said: “We have heard rumours that condition requiring a mechanised link between the stations may be removed, but no suitable alternative has been proposed, and we urge the Government not to give consent to the removal of this condition until all parties, including London TravelWatch, are satisfied that appropriate and convenient alternatives are in place.” Finally, London TravelWatch is worried that there is no firm date for Eurostar services to start calling at Stratford. Brian Cooke concluded: “A huge sum of public money went into building the high speed line and stations at St Pancras, Ebbsfleet and Stratford. It is a thorough disgrace that Stratford is not being bought into use now. We urge the Government to put all possible pressure on Eurostar and others to start services at Stratford.“ For more information, please contact Jo deBank in the London TravelWatch press office on 020 7726 9953 or out of hours on 07734 055494. The voice of London's transport users 30 May 2008 unquote |
Stratford - Mind the Gap
On 1 Jun, 15:13, Mwmbwls wrote: http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/...ument/3360/get quote Stratford access needs attention urgently London TravelWatch has written to the Government expressing its deep concerns about the lack of progress on interchange arrangements at Stratford. There are still no satisfactory arrangements between the platforms to be served by the Southeastern High Speed domestic services and Stratford regional services in the period between December 2009 when the high speed service commences and the completion of the work for the Olympics in 2012. Brian Cooke, Chairman, London TravelWatch said: “It is London TravelWatch’s view that it is essential that the Southeastern services call at Stratford from December 2009 to allow passengers to interchange for destinations in the City and Docklands, and that this interchange needs to be welcoming and safe for passengers. If the services do not stop at Stratford, we fear unacceptable levels of crowding on the remaining services into London Bridge and Cannon St and on the Jubilee line.” To achieve this, London TravelWatch believes that an interchange facility needs to be in place by December 2009, which would require the construction of a new bridge from the International station, an entrance to Stratford regional station, and a safe means of transporting passengers between these two sites between, or through, the construction area for 2012. Brian Cooke continued: “As we understand it, until the permanent pedestrian route, the new ticket hall and the Docklands Light Railway extension are in place, a shuttle bus would be needed, but there have been no assurances given by the Olympic Delivery Authority or the contractors that the roadway necessary for this service would be available by December 2009 - this is unacceptable.” London TravelWatch is also concerned that the building of a mechanised link, a requirement in the original Transport and Works Order, has not been enforced. Brian Cooke said: “We have heard rumours that condition requiring a mechanised link between the stations may be removed, but no suitable alternative has been proposed, and we urge the Government not to give consent to the removal of this condition until all parties, including London TravelWatch, are satisfied that appropriate and convenient alternatives are in place.” Finally, London TravelWatch is worried that there is no firm date for Eurostar services to start calling at Stratford. Brian Cooke concluded: “A huge sum of public money went into building the high speed line and stations at St Pancras, Ebbsfleet and Stratford. It is a thorough disgrace that Stratford is not being bought into use now. We urge the Government to put all possible pressure on Eurostar and others to start services at Stratford.“ For more information, please contact Jo deBank in the London TravelWatch press office on 020 7726 9953 or out of hours on 07734 055494. The voice of London's transport users 30 May 2008 unquote First off, I must get this off my chest - I don't like Brian Cooke after he publicly came out in support of one of the Mayoral candidates in the election, something many people aren;t at all happy about. The Assembly Transport Committee is holding an extraordinary meeting about this tomorrow morning and I hope something will be done about it - see: http://www.london.gov.uk/assembly/tr...n02/agenda.jsp I'm not sure whether one can see the timing of this intervention as Mr Cooke trying to win people over. Nevertheless, if we put the potential for political manoeuvrings aside, then there is certainly a point here. I presume the "mechanised link" translates to being a travolator. I was under the impression that this idea had been dumped long ago. What the above press release doesn't make clear is that the area between Stratford Regional and Stratford International stations will actually be covered by the Stratford City development, as opposed to the Olympic Park, though of course the aforementioned development (shops, homes & offices etc) is fundamentally intermeshed with the wider Olympic Park redevelopment. It is a bit difficult to see how passengers might be able to transfer between these two stations through a massive building site, but then again I suppose there could be some imaginative solutions like a temporary bridge or covered walkway. Southeastern's new high speed services from Kent (the CTRL-DS) won't look half as attractive to many if they don't stop at Stratford, given it's position as a gateway to the Docklands. Having had my doubts in the past, I now reckon Eurostar will eventually stop at least some of their trains at Stratford, but I have my doubts that they'll be keen doing this until the area surrounding the station is a bit less of a building site. A shuttle bus transfer between Stratford Int'l and Stratford Regional does seem somewhat less than ideal situation. |
Stratford - Mind the Gap
"Mwmbwls" wrote quote Stratford access needs attention urgently London TravelWatch has written to the Government expressing its deep concerns about the lack of progress on interchange arrangements at Stratford. There are still no satisfactory arrangements between the platforms to be served by the Southeastern High Speed domestic services and Stratford regional services in the period between December 2009 when the high speed service commences and the completion of the work for the Olympics in 2012. From some time in 2010 they will be linked by DLR - which is probably better than a shuttle bus or walking, especially through a building site. Peter |
Stratford - Mind the Gap
"Peter Masson" wrote in message ... "Mwmbwls" wrote quote Stratford access needs attention urgently London TravelWatch has written to the Government expressing its deep concerns about the lack of progress on interchange arrangements at Stratford. There are still no satisfactory arrangements between the platforms to be served by the Southeastern High Speed domestic services and Stratford regional services in the period between December 2009 when the high speed service commences and the completion of the work for the Olympics in 2012. From some time in 2010 they will be linked by DLR - which is probably better than a shuttle bus or walking, especially through a building site. I just googled 'Stratford travelator' - and having scanned a couple of dozen references still have no idea what the decision was... Paul S |
Stratford - Mind the Gap
On 1 Jun, 16:29, "Peter Masson" wrote: "Mwmbwls" wrote quote Stratford access needs attention urgently London TravelWatch has written to the Government expressing its deep concerns about the lack of progress on interchange arrangements at Stratford. There are still no satisfactory arrangements between the platforms to be served by the Southeastern High Speed domestic services and Stratford regional services in the period between December 2009 when the high speed service commences and the completion of the work for the Olympics in 2012. From some time in 2010 they will be linked by DLR - which is probably better than a shuttle bus or walking, especially through a building site. During the planning of the Jubilee line extension, I'm wondering whether there was ever any thought that provision might be made for extended the line from Stratford Regional to Stratford Int'l? Though when the JLE was being planned, I suppose the future existence of Stratford Int'l was far from certain. |
Stratford - Mind the Gap
"Mizter T" wrote During the planning of the Jubilee line extension, I'm wondering whether there was ever any thought that provision might be made for extended the line from Stratford Regional to Stratford Int'l? Though when the JLE was being planned, I suppose the future existence of Stratford Int'l was far from certain. and it would have been far from trivial to get the Jubilee Line under the GEML and to a terminus at Stratford International. I'm not sure, even when it had been decided that the CTRL would take the Stratford route, with a station there, that the exact location of Stratford International had been decided. ISTR suggestions that it would be closer to Stratford Regional so that connections between the two wouldn't need a travolator/long walk/shuttle bus/ DLR. Peter |
Stratford - Mind the Gap
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 16:54:40 +0100, Peter Masson wrote:
During the planning of the Jubilee line extension, I'm wondering whether there was ever any thought that provision might be made for extended the line from Stratford Regional to Stratford Int'l? Though when the JLE was being planned, I suppose the future existence of Stratford Int'l was far from certain. and it would have been far from trivial to get the Jubilee Line under the GEML and to a terminus at Stratford International. Erm, isn't that exactly what they're doing with the DLR? It will go from Stratford LL (from what are currently the NLL platforms, right next to the Jubilee) to Stratford International. |
Stratford - Mind the Gap
"asdf" wrote in message ... On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 16:54:40 +0100, Peter Masson wrote: and it would have been far from trivial to get the Jubilee Line under the GEML and to a terminus at Stratford International. Erm, isn't that exactly what they're doing with the DLR? It will go from Stratford LL (from what are currently the NLL platforms, right next to the Jubilee) to Stratford International. At the time there was no plan to truncate the NLL at Stratford, so the existing hole under the GEML, now used by the NLL and to be used by the DLR, would not have been available for the JLE. The JLE would have needed a new tunnelled route under the GEML, with underground stations at Stratford Regional and Stratford International. peter |
Stratford - Mind the Gap
On 1 Jun, 18:01, Paul Harley wrote: On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 08:00:24, Mizter T wrote: First off, I must get this off my chest - I don't like Brian Cooke after he publicly came out in support of one of the Mayoral candidates in the election, something many people aren;t at all happy about. The Assembly Transport Committee is holding an extraordinary meeting about this tomorrow morning and I hope something will be done about it - see: http://www.london.gov.uk/assembly/tr...n02/agenda.jsp Oh dear! Having read Appendix B of http://www.london.gov.uk/assembly/tr...n02/item06.pdf I can see why some people got upset. It's a strange statement to make by someone who is supposed to be politically impartial. Having said that, Brian Cooke does make some relevant points - it's a pity he dragged the London TravelWatch name into it. I don't know why you removed uk,transport.london when you posted as this issue is most relevant to that newsgroup - so I'm crossposting your reply back on utl. |
Stratford - Mind the Gap
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 08:00:24 -0700 (PDT), Mizter T
wrote: On 1 Jun, 15:13, Mwmbwls wrote: http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/...ument/3360/get quote Stratford access needs attention urgently London TravelWatch has written to the Government expressing its deep concerns about the lack of progress on interchange arrangements at Stratford. [snip] First off, I must get this off my chest - I don't like Brian Cooke after he publicly came out in support of one of the Mayoral candidates in the election, something many people aren;t at all happy about. The Assembly Transport Committee is holding an extraordinary meeting about this tomorrow morning and I hope something will be done about it - see: http://www.london.gov.uk/assembly/tr...n02/agenda.jsp I'm not sure whether one can see the timing of this intervention as Mr Cooke trying to win people over. Having read the statement in full as an attachment to the agenda he does not deserve to stay on nor be considered for a further term. He clearly used his position at London Travelwatch to issue a personal statement when the rules are quite clear that he should not have done so. I thought that what got published in the press was bad enough but the whole statement is even worse. Nevertheless, if we put the potential for political manoeuvrings aside, then there is certainly a point here. I presume the "mechanised link" translates to being a travolator. I was under the impression that this idea had been dumped long ago. I think people have simply hoped and prayed that if they ignore this legal requirement that it will go away. I can't see DfT enforcing the requirement as it would bugger up all the other works on the site. What the above press release doesn't make clear is that the area between Stratford Regional and Stratford International stations will actually be covered by the Stratford City development, as opposed to the Olympic Park, though of course the aforementioned development (shops, homes & offices etc) is fundamentally intermeshed with the wider Olympic Park redevelopment. It is a bit difficult to see how passengers might be able to transfer between these two stations through a massive building site, but then again I suppose there could be some imaginative solutions like a temporary bridge or covered walkway. I think only a shuttle bus with controlled loading at each end could be considered. However it would not be a quick journey as so much of the road access to the southern edge of the site has gone. It is worth noting though that Hackney and Ealing Community Transports have combined to win a tender for Olympic worksite bus services - allegedly using the former bendy buses from Selkent that ran on the 453. Perhaps a further use for whatever remaining bendy buses are left? Southeastern's new high speed services from Kent (the CTRL-DS) won't look half as attractive to many if they don't stop at Stratford, given it's position as a gateway to the Docklands. Having had my doubts in the past, I now reckon Eurostar will eventually stop at least some of their trains at Stratford, but I have my doubts that they'll be keen doing this until the area surrounding the station is a bit less of a building site. I doubt Eurostar will stop even if the DLR is in place or even post 2012. I think their shambolic disdain for service provision at Ashford sets a dreadful precedent and as the cost of wasted facilities does not land on their doorstep they can ignore Stratford with impunity. I doubt the forthcoming sale of the CTRL link will help either as that will raise the commercial pressures on both sides. I'd love to be proved wrong as Stratford is relatively convenient for me. A shuttle bus transfer between Stratford Int'l and Stratford Regional does seem somewhat less than ideal situation. Agreed but it'd be better than nothing if it could be make to work so that traffic gets established. If not I see the DLR service simply being a ghost service once the Olympics has done unless it is further extended into the housing development towards Leyton station. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:12 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk