![]() |
Blackfriars - SET services after December 2008
What will happen to SouthEastern train services into Blackfriars after
December 2008 - diverted to Victoria, cancelled, or will there be a limited service continuing through to City Thameslink and terminating at Smithfield sidings? |
Blackfriars - SET services after December 2008
"eNautilus" wrote in message ... What will happen to SouthEastern train services into Blackfriars after December 2008 - diverted to Victoria, cancelled, or will there be a limited service continuing through to City Thameslink and terminating at Smithfield sidings? They will be running through to at least Kentish Town, possibly further, although March 2009 is now believed to be the start date. FCC drivers are currently training on dual voltage 377s, a number of which will be transferred from Southern. Paul |
Blackfriars - SET services after December 2008
On Jun 3, 9:57 pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote: "eNautilus" wrote in message ... What will happen to SouthEastern train services into Blackfriars after December 2008 - diverted to Victoria, cancelled, or will there be a limited service continuing through to City Thameslink and terminating at Smithfield sidings? They will be running through to at least Kentish Town, possibly further, although March 2009 is now believed to be the start date. FCC drivers are currently training on dual voltage 377s, a number of which will be transferred from Southern. I wonder if theres an argument for extending the 3rd rail to kentish town so dual voltage stock isn't required. B2003 |
Blackfriars - SET services after December 2008
On 4 Jun, 10:12, wrote:
I wonder if theres an argument for extending the 3rd rail to kentish town so dual voltage stock isn't required. It wouldn't be very useful. The interim arrangement is more about having somewhere to send the peak services from the north with the Moorgate branch gone. There's not really anywhere to terminate them, so running them through as services to Kent (replacing the SET Blackfriars services) is the only real option. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
Blackfriars - SET services after December 2008
On 4 Jun, 10:12, wrote:
On Jun 3, 9:57 pm, "Paul Scott" wrote: "eNautilus" wrote in message ... What will happen to SouthEastern train services into Blackfriars after December 2008 - diverted to Victoria, cancelled, or will there be a limited service continuing through to City Thameslink and terminating at Smithfield sidings? They will be running through to at least Kentish Town, possibly further, although March 2009 is now believed to be the start date. FCC drivers are currently training on dual voltage 377s, a number of which will be transferred from Southern. I wonder if theres an argument for extending the 3rd rail to kentish town so dual voltage stock isn't required. Short answer: no, there isn't. Longer answer: dual voltage stock is easy to make and reliable, and all post-1994 DC stock either already is or easily can be converted to dual voltage; laying third rail [and providing the high current substations required] is expensive, time-consuming and disruptive; and maintaining dual AC/DC electrification is technically quite difficult. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Blackfriars - SET services after December 2008
On 4 Jun, 10:56, Mr Thant wrote: On 4 Jun, 10:12, wrote: I wonder if theres an argument for extending the 3rd rail to kentish town so dual voltage stock isn't required. Apart from any other reasons, this would be pretty costly, and require the installation of a whole new array of kit and more substations. It wouldn't be very useful. The interim arrangement is more about having somewhere to send the peak services from the north with the Moorgate branch gone. There's not really anywhere to terminate them, so running them through as services to Kent (replacing the SET Blackfriars services) is the only real option. But that only accounts for the displaced peak (no-longer Moorgate bound) Thameslink trains from points north. I presume terminating the other off-peak trains at City Thameslink and then perhaps parking them up in the Smithfield sidings until they're due to head south again is considered impractical given the frequency of trains on the core Thameslink route. At Kentish Town I presume the benefit is that the fast Bedford trains will be on the fast tracks, hence there's less opportunity for terminating/reversing trains to jam up the whole Thameslink service. Still, I can see plenty of opportunities for things to go snafu if trains are running late. |
Blackfriars - SET services after December 2008
"Mr Thant" wrote in message ... It wouldn't be very useful. The interim arrangement is more about having somewhere to send the peak services from the north with the Moorgate branch gone. There's not really anywhere to terminate them, so running them through as services to Kent (replacing the SET Blackfriars services) is the only real option. U What exactly is happening with the Moorgate branch? |
Blackfriars - SET services after December 2008
wrote in message ... "Mr Thant" wrote in message ... It wouldn't be very useful. The interim arrangement is more about having somewhere to send the peak services from the north with the Moorgate branch gone. There's not really anywhere to terminate them, so running them through as services to Kent (replacing the SET Blackfriars services) is the only real option. U What exactly is happening with the Moorgate branch? Permanent closure of the NR lines between Farringdon and Moorgate, primarily so that the NR platforms at Farringdon can be extended southwards over the existing junction for 12 car Thameslink trains. Secondly, the 24 tph throughput planned for the central section could not operate across the flat junction anyway, even if there was an alternative way of extending the platforms - they can't extend to the north because of the diveunder to get to the other side of the LU tracks. Paul S |
Blackfriars - SET services after December 2008
On 4 Jun, 20:44, wrote: "Mr Thant" wrote: It wouldn't be very useful. The interim arrangement is more about having somewhere to send the peak services from the north with the Moorgate branch gone. There's not really anywhere to terminate them, so running them through as services to Kent (replacing the SET Blackfriars services) is the only real option. It's being shut. The platforms at Farringdon can't be extended to 12- car length without fouling the junction towards Moorgate, so the branch will be closed. There are various suggestions here and elsewhere about the alignment being used for stabling LU trains given that it's adjacent to the Met/ Circle/H&C, though nothing official. |
Blackfriars - SET services after December 2008
Mizter T wrote:
I presume terminating the other off-peak trains at City Thameslink and then perhaps parking them up in the Smithfield sidings until they're due to head south again is considered impractical given the frequency of trains on the core Thameslink route. That is true, and according to Nick Lawford the sidings will close when the Key Output 0 service starts. At Kentish Town I presume the benefit is that the fast Bedford trains will be on the fast tracks, hence there's less opportunity for terminating/reversing trains to jam up the whole Thameslink service. *All* cross-London FCC TL services use the Moorgate (TL) lines south of Kentish Town Jn (between West Hampstead Thameslink and Kentish Town). Using the same point of reference,* services on the fast and slow/carriage (MML) lines reverse at London St Pancras (high-level) and Kentish Town respectively. It is expected that off-peak joint FCC TL/SER services will start/terminate at Kentish Town on the Moorgate lines, but only by virtue of heading ECS to/from Cricklewood sidings. [* OK, Carlton Road Jn (also between WHP and KTN) is the point of reference for the fast lines since Kentish Town Jn does not include them] |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk