Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield wrote in
: All the buses I used this morning had "defective" card readers. One driver had put a piece of paper over the reader saying "free day" and happily telling everyone that it was a "special offer day" on the tube and buses. I thought for a minute it was the new mayor of London attempting to make himself popular... Richard |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:02:42 GMT, Richard Dixon
wrote: Paul Corfield wrote in : All the buses I used this morning had "defective" card readers. One driver had put a piece of paper over the reader saying "free day" and happily telling everyone that it was a "special offer day" on the tube and buses. I thought for a minute it was the new mayor of London attempting to make himself popular... It will be interesting to see what the reaction from Team Boris is. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Jul, 02:30, chunky munky wrote:
The problem with the software was that any card touched on a bit of Oyster kit was hotlisted and permenantly disabled. Anyone affected by this will have to get a brand new card. Yet another PFI cock up, albeit only one day, not long after a few weeks ago when they were updating software on the LU Radios which they didnt realise was causing them not to work, until alphabetically it got to D for District! (At least the W&C would be pleased) Please explain how public sector ownership would have prevented this; you may use any data you have available on the relative customer service, IT and project management competence of public sector and private sector management. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Dulieu wrote:
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 18:30:18 on Sat, 12 Jul 2008, chunky munky remarked: The problem with the software was that any card touched on a bit of Oyster kit was hotlisted and permenantly disabled. Anyone affected by this will have to get a brand new card. Really? Have there been any press reports of this. You'd think people would have noticed. And what about folks with combined Barclaycard/ Oyster, do you think they'll need a new one too? If this was the case, how did people manage to "touch out" later in the day, having attempted to "touch in" earlier? According to a staff bulletin put out Saturday morning, a "corrupted electronic file" uploaded overnight meant that any oyster used before 09:30 was hotlisted and permanently disabled. In what sense are they "permanently" disabled? Does it just mean that the Oyster people can't be bothered to do the necessary reprogramming over the weekend to undo the 'disabled' setting? Was anything written to the cards themselves, or have they just been entered on a central list? -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 10:36:33
on Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Steve Dulieu remarked: According to a staff bulletin put out Saturday morning, a "corrupted electronic file" uploaded overnight meant that any oyster used before 09:30 was hotlisted and permanently disabled. The figure on the bulletin that I saw said that it could be as many as 100,000 cards that had been killed. The, admittedly few, stations I went through yesterday all had their gates set open, so no-one would need to touch in or out to access the system or leave Interesting. The media is mainly covering the aspect (which sounds from your information like a hoax) that people only-touching-out, later in the day, will pay penalty fares. If no-one is touching out at all (and indeed 100k people couldn't touch out anyway) this sounds improbable. TFL is compounding the situation by saying that these penalty fares will be cancelled automatically in a special operation. -- Roland Perry |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... TFL is compounding the situation by saying that these penalty fares will be cancelled automatically in a special operation. Er.. 'maximum cash fares' to be accurate... Paul S |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 13:42:39 on
Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Paul Scott remarked: TFL is compounding the situation by saying that these penalty fares will be cancelled automatically in a special operation. Er.. 'maximum cash fares' to be accurate... Normally I might agree with you, but this time it's a penalty for TFL's cockup ![]() -- Roland Perry |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 10:36:33 on Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Steve Dulieu remarked: According to a staff bulletin put out Saturday morning, a "corrupted electronic file" uploaded overnight meant that any oyster used before 09:30 was hotlisted and permanently disabled. The figure on the bulletin that I saw said that it could be as many as 100,000 cards that had been killed. The, admittedly few, stations I went through yesterday all had their gates set open, so no-one would need to touch in or out to access the system or leave Interesting. The media is mainly covering the aspect (which sounds from your information like a hoax) that people only-touching-out, later in the day, will pay penalty fares. If no-one is touching out at all (and indeed 100k people couldn't touch out anyway) this sounds improbable. TFL is compounding the situation by saying that these penalty fares will be cancelled automatically in a special operation. A further bulletin has set out the procedure for cards that have been disabled... "Customers who present disabled cards should be referred to the ticket office. If the ticket office is closed or the queue very long then customers with disabled cards should be permitted to travel and invited to visit the ticket office at their destination if possible. Presented cards should be checked via the TOM to see if it can be read, if it can then follow normal procedure. If a card cannot be read, then the normal failed card procedure should be used. Where a customer advises that the disabled card held either less than £10 of PAYG value or any weekly travelcard then a replacement can be issued immediately with no further checks necessary. The amount or remaining days of the weekly indicated by the customer should be loaded on the card. If the customer advises that the card held a higher PAYG value than £10 or a longer period travel card, you should call the CSC on auto XXXX to validate their details prior to issue. If you cannot get through, advise the customer that they can travel using their oyster card for visual inspection only and should return to the ticket office later. If the card is of a type that cannot be replaced at a ticket office - eg a freedom pass - then the customer should be advised to follow the usual replacement procedure. Freedom pass holders should be advised to contact the council of issue. Child photocard holders should apply for a replacement by using the number on the back of the card." Apparently extra supplies of oyster blanks and gateline passes are being distributed to busy stations, as well as RCIs being deployed at key locations to provide support. The same bulletin also says that customers who were within the system before 09:30 "may" have been charged a maximum fare on exit. It says that this will be addressed automatically via gatelines on Tuesday morning. Hope this goes some way towards helping people understand what's going on. -- Cheers, Steve. Change jealous to sad to reply. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at
16:04:04 on Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Steve Dulieu remarked: If the card is of a type that cannot be replaced at a ticket office - eg a freedom pass - then the customer should be advised to follow the usual replacement procedure. Freedom pass holders should be advised to contact the council of issue. Child photocard holders should apply for a replacement by using the number on the back of the card." And people with a Barclaycard/Oyster?? -- Roland Perry |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 16:04:04 on Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Steve Dulieu remarked: If the card is of a type that cannot be replaced at a ticket office - eg a freedom pass - then the customer should be advised to follow the usual replacement procedure. Freedom pass holders should be advised to contact the council of issue. Child photocard holders should apply for a replacement by using the number on the back of the card." And people with a Barclaycard/Oyster?? Doesn't mention them at all. At a guess, and having never seen a Barclay card oyster, I suspect they have to contact the card issuer. -- Cheers, Steve. Change jealous to sad to reply. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Welcome! - Free Software Directory - Free Software Foundation______ | London Transport | |||
Free Free Software Downloads and Software Reviews – Download | London Transport | |||
free free 100 dollors free 4days only FRee REGISTER ONLy | London Transport | |||
Win a Free gaming console, PS3, X-BOX or Nintendo wii, Free Prize Draw | London Transport | |||
Win a Free gaming console, PS3, X-BOX or Nintendo wii, Free Prize Draw | London Transport |