![]() |
Blackfriars closure
"One of the capital's busiest Underground stations is to shut for nearly
three years. Blackfriars station, used by about 44,000 City workers and tourists every day, will close for works to upgrade the main line Thameslink." http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle4467645.ece March 2009 until late 2011. "Yesterday's announcement prompted concerns about commuter disruption, with the nearest Tube stations ten minutes' walk away. There were also fears of delays to the planned works because Network Rail has been criticised for presiding over several project overruns." Nice to see the Times taking the pessimist view... "Richard Parry, London Underground's director of strategy and service development, said: "The redevelopment of Blackfriars Underground station is part of Network Rail works. Once the works are complete, customers will get a new upgraded station with step-free access, increased capacity and better interchange facilities between the Tube and national rail services." Are LU trying here to make this into a NR problem? Presumably NR are updating Blackfriars underground because as it stands it just won't cope with the increase in passengers expected. Could it ever have been considered possible to upgrade the mainline station without the underground? I doubt it, so why take this line in public? Far better surely for LU to just announce that the whole station is being remodelled, and our colleagues at NR are leading the project... Paul S |
Blackfriars closure
"Paul Scott" wrote in message
... "One of the capital's busiest Underground stations is to shut for nearly three years. Blackfriars station, used by about 44,000 City workers and tourists every day, will close for works to upgrade the main line Thameslink." http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle4467645.ece March 2009 until late 2011. "Yesterday's announcement prompted concerns about commuter disruption, with the nearest Tube stations ten minutes' walk away. There were also fears of delays to the planned works because Network Rail has been criticised for presiding over several project overruns." Nice to see the Times taking the pessimist view... "Richard Parry, London Underground's director of strategy and service development, said: "The redevelopment of Blackfriars Underground station is part of Network Rail works. Once the works are complete, customers will get a new upgraded station with step-free access, increased capacity and better interchange facilities between the Tube and national rail services." Are LU trying here to make this into a NR problem? Presumably NR are updating Blackfriars underground because as it stands it just won't cope with the increase in passengers expected. Could it ever have been considered possible to upgrade the mainline station without the underground? I doubt it, so why take this line in public? Far better surely for LU to just announce that the whole station is being remodelled, and our colleagues at NR are leading the project... Paul S How long was T4 out of service, until late 2006? |
Blackfriars closure
Paul Scott wrote:
"One of the capital's busiest Underground stations is to shut for nearly three years. Blackfriars station, used by about 44,000 City workers and tourists every day, will close for works to upgrade the main line Thameslink." Blackfriars is the station closest to my old school (City of London) and if it had been closed when I went there I would have been almost permanently late in the mornings and in the afternoons the combined effect of getting to the nearest station (Temple?) and the mainline timetable would have almost doubled my journey home. Nice! "Richard Parry, London Underground's director of strategy and service development, said: "The redevelopment of Blackfriars Underground station is part of Network Rail works. Once the works are complete, customers will get a new upgraded station with step-free access, increased capacity and better interchange facilities between the Tube and national rail services." Oh yes, I've had *so* many problems interchanging with the current set-up at Blackfriars! |
Blackfriars closure
|
Blackfriars closure
"Paul Scott" wrote in
: "One of the capital's busiest Underground stations is to shut for nearly three years. Blackfriars station, used by about 44,000 City workers and tourists every day, will close for works to upgrade the main line Thameslink." The network rail media centre has a lovely image of the new South Bank entrance at Blackfrairs (click on the image for a hi-res version). Not only is the signage to the London Underground corporate image (I assume the tube is staying on the North bank) but it is clearly a 4-VEP leaving the new station .... http://www.networkrailmediacentre.co...ReleaseID=3854 &NewsAreaID=2&SearchCategoryID=2 David |
Blackfriars closure
In message , Philip
Hardy writes How long was T4 out of service, until late 2006? BAA never took the T4 out of service while the underground station was upgraded ;-) In reality, very little work was done to the T4 station other than a bit of a deep clean. The work was to create the junction for the T5 line and trains couldn't run through T4 whilst this was happening, it was not to upgrade T4. -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
Blackfriars closure
On Aug 6, 7:20*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote: "One of the capital's busiest Underground stations is to shut for nearly three years. Blackfriars station, used by about 44,000 City workers and tourists every day, will close for works to upgrade the main line Thameslink." http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to..._sectors/trans... March 2009 until late 2011. "Yesterday's announcement prompted concerns about commuter disruption, with the nearest Tube stations ten minutes' walk away. There were also fears of delays to the planned works because Network Rail has been criticised for presiding over several project overruns." Nice to see the Times taking the pessimist view... "Richard Parry, London Underground's director of strategy and service development, said: "The redevelopment of Blackfriars Underground station is part of Network Rail works. Once the works are complete, customers will get a new upgraded station with step-free access, increased capacity and better interchange facilities between the Tube and national rail services." Are LU trying here to make this into a NR problem? Presumably NR are updating Blackfriars underground because as it stands it just won't cope with the increase in passengers expected. Could it ever have been considered possible to upgrade the mainline station without the underground? I doubt it, so why take this line in public? Far better surely for LU to just announce that the whole station is being remodelled, and our colleagues at NR are leading the project... Paul S 10 minutes walk? To the nearest tube station? Gasps in horror... You poor darlings ;-) |
Blackfriars closure
On 6 Aug, 22:55, darkprince66 wrote:
10 minutes walk? To the nearest tube station? Gasps in horror... You poor darlings ;-) I know, that was my reaction. If we weren't spoiled we wouldn't be so worried. Chancery Lane, Holborn etc aren't far. By the standards of many towns and cities, Waterloo isn't far. Francis |
Blackfriars closure
On Aug 7, 1:48 am, " wrote:
On 6 Aug, 22:55, darkprince66 wrote: 10 minutes walk? To the nearest tube station? Gasps in horror... You poor darlings ;-) I know, that was my reaction. If we weren't spoiled we wouldn't be so worried. Chancery Lane, Holborn etc aren't far. By the standards of many towns and cities, Waterloo isn't far. Francis True, but it still makes you wonder how _necessary_ the closure really is. As far as I recall, the works are to extend the platforms (to the south bank) and create four through ones instead of two through and three bays - I'm sure someone _could_ work out a way to do this leaving one platform open each time (even if Northbound only or whatever). |
Blackfriars closure
wrote in message ... On Aug 7, 1:48 am, " wrote: On 6 Aug, 22:55, darkprince66 wrote: 10 minutes walk? To the nearest tube station? Gasps in horror... You poor darlings ;-) I know, that was my reaction. If we weren't spoiled we wouldn't be so worried. Chancery Lane, Holborn etc aren't far. By the standards of many towns and cities, Waterloo isn't far. Francis True, but it still makes you wonder how _necessary_ the closure really is. As far as I recall, the works are to extend the platforms (to the south bank) and create four through ones instead of two through and three bays - I'm sure someone _could_ work out a way to do this leaving one platform open each time (even if Northbound only or whatever). Blackfriars NR station will remain open for most of the time. It is Blackfriars LUL which is to close (although trains will continue to run through without stopping). The adjoining stations of Mansion House and Temple are both less than half a mile away, while interchange passengers have other stations where they can access the tube network. The changes to the NR station are to change it from two through platforms, plus three east side bays, all of 8-car length, to two through 12-car platforms plus two west side bays. More significant is to rebuild the circulating areas so that the station can cope with many more passengers, including many more interchanging with LUL. There will be a new entrance on teh south bank. Peter |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk