![]() |
Hey ho, hey ho, its off to strike we go...
... with a Bob Crowe here and a dodgy ballot there , hey ho hey ho etc
etc Mr Bobbys performance related bonus must be due soon. Obviously the strike quota hasn't been met this year so something needs to be done! http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4523192.ece B2003 |
Hey ho, hey ho, its off to strike we go...
"Boltar" wrote in message
... .. with a Bob Crowe here and a dodgy ballot there , hey ho hey ho etc etc Mr Bobbys performance related bonus must be due soon. Obviously the strike quota hasn't been met this year so something needs to be done! http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4523192.ece Just seems to go along with some plonker of an Economics Spokesman (or something like that) from the TUC who was coming out with all sorts of crap why their members should get above inflation pay rises "because this inflation isn't caused by wage increases." Obviously he wants it to be so. |
Hey ho, hey ho, its off to strike we go...
On Aug 14, 4:56 pm, "Graculus"
wrote: Just seems to go along with some plonker of an Economics Spokesman (or something like that) from the TUC who was coming out with all sorts of crap why their members should get above inflation pay rises "because this inflation isn't caused by wage increases." Obviously he wants it to be so. What makes me sick is that for some reason I've never fathomed is that public sector workers seem to assume that a yearly pay rise is a right as opposed to being discretionary by the employer. They really need to rejoin the real world at some point. B2003 |
Hey ho, hey ho, its off to strike we go...
On 14 Aug, 16:56, "Graculus"
wrote: "Boltar" wrote in message ... .. with a Bob Crowe here and a dodgy ballot there , hey ho hey ho etc etc Mr Bobbys performance related bonus must be due soon. Obviously the strike quota hasn't been met this year so something needs to be done! http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4523192.ece Just seems to go along with some plonker of an Economics Spokesman (or something like that) from the TUC who was coming out with all sorts of crap why their members should get above inflation pay rises "because this inflation isn't caused by wage increases." Obviously he wants it to be so. I reckon everyone's pay should double, or we could simple halve the value of the pound. It would be great for exports, shame we rely on imports for food and fuel... |
Hey ho, hey ho, its off to strike we go...
"Paul Weaver" wrote in message
... On 14 Aug, 16:56, "Graculus" wrote: "Boltar" wrote in message ... .. with a Bob Crowe here and a dodgy ballot there , hey ho hey ho etc etc Mr Bobbys performance related bonus must be due soon. Obviously the strike quota hasn't been met this year so something needs to be done! http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4523192.ece Just seems to go along with some plonker of an Economics Spokesman (or something like that) from the TUC who was coming out with all sorts of crap why their members should get above inflation pay rises "because this inflation isn't caused by wage increases." Obviously he wants it to be so. I reckon everyone's pay should double, or we could simple halve the value of the pound. It would be great for exports, shame we rely on imports for food and fuel... Have you seen the exchange rates (euro or dollar) over the last week or two? I think that's already happening :-) |
Hey ho, hey ho, its off to strike we go...
On Aug 14, 5:02*pm, Boltar wrote:
On Aug 14, 4:56 pm, "Graculus" wrote: Just seems to go along with some plonker of an Economics Spokesman (or something like that) from the TUC who was coming out with all sorts of crap why their members should get above inflation pay rises "because this inflation isn't caused by wage increases." Obviously he wants it to be so. What makes me sick is that for some reason I've never fathomed is that public sector workers seem to assume that a yearly pay rise is a right as opposed to being discretionary by the employer. They really need to rejoin the real world at some point. Is this relevant? I thought the dispute was about Tubelines being paid less than Metronet. |
Hey ho, hey ho, its off to strike we go...
On Aug 15, 8:32 am, MIG wrote:
Is this relevant? I thought the dispute was about Tubelines being paid less than Metronet. If it is then so what? Plenty of other people do the same job as me around london. Do I get paid exactly the same as them? Probably not. In fact I'd be surprised if the salaries didn't vary inside my company for the same job - thats the way it works in the private sector. LIke I said, they need to rejoin the real world. B2003 |
Hey ho, hey ho, its off to strike we go...
On 15 Aug, 09:11, Boltar wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:32 am, MIG wrote: Is this relevant? *I thought the dispute was about Tubelines being paid less than Metronet. If it is then so what? Plenty of other people do the same job as me around london. Do I get paid exactly the same as them? Probably not. In fact I'd be surprised if the salaries didn't vary inside my company for the same job - thats the way it works in the private sector. LIke I said, they need to rejoin the real world. That's a separate argument. I'm just helping to focus the rant on the actual dispute, which was not about whether or not there should be annual pay rises. |
Hey ho, hey ho, its off to strike we go...
"Boltar" wrote in message
... On Aug 14, 4:56 pm, "Graculus" wrote: Just seems to go along with some plonker of an Economics Spokesman (or something like that) from the TUC who was coming out with all sorts of crap why their members should get above inflation pay rises "because this inflation isn't caused by wage increases." Obviously he wants it to be so. What makes me sick is that for some reason I've never fathomed is that public sector workers seem to assume that a yearly pay rise is a right as opposed to being discretionary by the employer. They really need to rejoin the real world at some point. Not just the public sector, it seems. There's a plonker from Swissport trying to justify why striking at the airports on the bank holiday weekend is a good idea. And so many cliches in so few sentences I haven't heard in a long time. What a dickhead. |
Hey ho, hey ho, its off to strike we go...
On 15 Aug, 17:44, "Graculus"
wrote: "Boltar" wrote in message ... On Aug 14, 4:56 pm, "Graculus" wrote: Just seems to go along with some plonker of an Economics Spokesman (or something like that) from the TUC who was coming out with all sorts of crap why their members should get above inflation pay rises "because this inflation isn't caused by wage increases." Obviously he wants it to be so. What makes me sick is that for some reason I've never fathomed is that public sector workers seem to assume that a yearly pay rise is a right as opposed to being discretionary by the employer. They really need to rejoin the real world at some point. Not just the public sector, it seems. There's a plonker from Swissport trying to justify why striking at the airports on the bank holiday weekend is a good idea. And so many cliches in so few sentences I haven't heard in a long time. What a dickhead. That would never happen on the railways of course. The routes to the seaside are all closed for engineering work most August bank holidays. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk