Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#121
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:25:56 -0000, "Q" ..@.. wrote:
The Microwave sources on the tops of the lights, and now little boxes with aerials are linked back into the local control unit, when a vaild coded signal is recieved it triggers a cycle in favour of the lamp recieving the signal. Does it trigger it immediately, or just on the next change? The European variety seem to trigger it immediately (i.e. as a bus approaches all others go straight to red), which gives a nice feeling to the bus passengers of real priority. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#122
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Rowland" wrote :
There is one in Bloomsbury Street approximately opposite Bedford Avenue. From here on the bus lane is on the right side, ready for the turn into New Oxford Street. I think it used to work okay before the bendies, but bendies usually end up stretching across all three lanes here. Usually? ********; that's a -- Andrew "If A is success in life, then A = x + y + z. Work is x; y is play; and z is keeping your mouth shut." ~ Albert Einstein. |
#123
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 23 Nov, 18:17, (Neil Williams) wrote: On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:25:56 -0000, "Q" ..@.. wrote: The Microwave sources on the tops of the lights, and now little boxes with aerials are linked back into the local control unit, when a vaild coded signal is recieved it triggers a cycle in favour of the lamp recieving the signal. Does it trigger it immediately, or just on the next change? *The European variety seem to trigger it immediately (i.e. as a bus approaches all others go straight to red), which gives a nice feeling to the bus passengers of real priority. I'd like to reply to your substantive post point-by-point if I get the time (as well as reading through the other replies), but I'm going to wade in here in the meantime... From this and other comments you've made about bus priority in the past it almost seems as though you consider the issue of each individual bus in isolation. In central London it's highly likely that there will be numerous other buses carrying numerous other passengers which also need to negotiate traffic signal controlled junctions, the difference being that they'll be approaching from other angles. Factor in the need to keep traffic moving through the complex web of road junctions in central London and all the interconnected traffic signal phasing - all of which is a fine balance, but of course can only ever be a compromise - and then perhaps the notion of individual traffic signals being held on green for a substantial time for a bus (or going green significantly earlier etc etc) starts to look like one that doesn't result in the best overall outcome. (I'm tempted to say butterflies and tornados, though of course weekday daytime traffic in London is something of a storm already - the question is how well that storm gets handled, and I dare say it could be dealt with far far worse than it is, though that's not to say it couldn't be improved.) |
#124
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mizter T" wrote in message ... On 23 Nov, 18:17, (Neil Williams) wrote: On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:25:56 -0000, "Q" ..@.. wrote: The Microwave sources on the tops of the lights, and now little boxes with aerials are linked back into the local control unit, when a vaild coded signal is recieved it triggers a cycle in favour of the lamp recieving the signal. Does it trigger it immediately, or just on the next change? The European variety seem to trigger it immediately (i.e. as a bus approaches all others go straight to red), which gives a nice feeling to the bus passengers of real priority. I don't recall - it was a long time ago the pilot was done where I'm based and I was not directley involved. ISTR it was 'quite' quick. I'd like to reply to your substantive post point-by-point if I get the time (as well as reading through the other replies), but I'm going to wade in here in the meantime... *nod* From this and other comments you've made about bus priority in the past it almost seems as though you consider the issue of each individual bus in isolation. Is that directed at me ? I've only ever made a few posts (That I recall with out goooooogle's help) on the subject and I always try and stay 'neutral' on things like this. In central London it's highly likely that there will be numerous other buses carrying numerous other passengers which also need to negotiate traffic signal controlled junctions, the difference being that they'll be approaching from other angles. Factor in the need to keep traffic moving through the complex web of road junctions in central London and all the interconnected traffic signal phasing - all of which is a fine balance, but of course can only ever be a compromise - and then perhaps the notion of individual traffic signals being held on green for a substantial time for a bus (or going green significantly earlier etc etc) starts to look like one that doesn't result in the best overall outcome. Indeed, and this is why better UTC is what's needed. LTCC do a fairley alright job, and someone has already posted a link to a TfL document talking about IBus and SCOOT and UTC ideas/plans. (I'm tempted to say butterflies and tornados, though of course weekday daytime traffic in London is something of a storm already - the question is how well that storm gets handled, and I dare say it could be dealt with far far worse than it is, though that's not to say it couldn't be improved.) Indeed there are many things that *could* be done to make things better, but that I feel is for another thread. |
#125
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Heenan wrote:
"John Rowland" wrote : There is one in Bloomsbury Street approximately opposite Bedford Avenue. From here on the bus lane is on the right side, ready for the turn into New Oxford Street. I think it used to work okay before the bendies, but bendies usually end up stretching across all three lanes here. Usually? ********; that's a Okay, thanks for |
#126
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Rowland" wrote in message
... Andrew Heenan wrote: "John Rowland" wrote : There is one in Bloomsbury Street approximately opposite Bedford Avenue. From here on the bus lane is on the right side, ready for the turn into New Oxford Street. I think it used to work okay before the bendies, but bendies usually end up stretching across all three lanes here. Usually? ********; that's a Okay, thanks for That's -- Andrew PS - I have to slip up occasionally, to prove I'm not perfect! |
#127
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 11:56:10AM +0000, Neil Williams wrote:
David Cantrell wrote: When I use a taxi, I don't want to have to find the nearest taxi layby and wait there until an available taxi just happens to go past, I want to walk to the nearest place that I know lots of taxis drive past, hail one, and jump in with the taxi stopping for maybe all of 20 seconds. This part does, admittedly, show a bit of personal bias in that I more or less never use taxis unless there is no other option, which in central London is basically never. It's worth noting that Singapore does have "taxi stops" of this nature, though. How are they distributed? We have something broadly similar in London anyway - minicabs, where you go to a particular place and get a car ride. But they serve a different purpose, at least the way I use them. I use a minicab late at night to get home, when the train service has started to wind down. I use a black cab earlier in the day for situations where, eg, I've left work later than expected and am in a hurry to get to the theatre. -- David Cantrell | Godless Liberal Elitist If you have received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk, and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes. |
#128
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A question about the traffic lights:
I've noticed that some lights have a board with a white lining on its edges, whereas others do not. What's that about? |
#129
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:57:40 +0000, David Cantrell
wrote: How are they distributed? Good question... I forget. ISTR there are quite a lot of them but I can't recall how many. We have something broadly similar in London anyway - minicabs, where you go to a particular place and get a car ride. But they serve a different purpose, at least the way I use them. Taxi ranks are a bit different in that they tend to be used for pick-up only. The big problem is that it's drop-off that takes time and causes far more of an obstruction than pick-up, as the taxi user has to fumble for change etc, rather than just driving straight off as the user gets in. Idea: Why can't taxis accept Oyster? It would obviously have to be outside the cap etc, but it would seem a good idea? No fumbling for change, and taxis not blocking the bus lanes for too long? Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#130
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:09:43 -0800 (PST), Mr Thant
wrote: [bus priority at traffic lights] The system is called "extended green" and keeps the lights from changing in the face of an approaching bus. There's no visible indication a set of lights has it. Not at the lights, no, but the old system uses beacons attached to nearby lamp-posts on the approach. They look like the beacons used for Countdown Mk 1 but apparently usually have a power supply whereas the vehicle location beacons are usually battery-powered. They don't know whether a bus is late or not, of course. The replacement system, part of iBus, can fix this - but although it was a requirement to be able to consider lateness I don't know whether it will work like this initially. Richard. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Constant anouncements on London Buses | London Transport | |||
Wot is the bussiest route on red buses in London with in M25 | London Transport | |||
London Buses - they got a special on light bulbs or something? | London Transport | |||
London buses - noise | London Transport | |||
F.A London Buses Remembered VHS History Of Routemaster | London Transport |