On Dec 9, 9:03 pm, James Farrar wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:11:35 -0800 (PST), wrote:
That people think complaining about shonky service is nitpicking
rather sums up this sad little island.

It's not *that* you complain, it's the *way* you complain.

Lassie would go online and claim her £4 customer charter voucher.

Been there done that. However 4 quid doesn't make up for my wasted
time.

B2003

On Dec 9, 9:03 pm, James Farrar wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:35:52 -0800 (PST), wrote:
As for the paedo reference

Eh?

You're a moron.

And you apparently can't read. Still , this is utl so no surprise
there.

B2003

On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:06:56 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 9, 9:03 pm, James Farrar wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:11:35 -0800 (PST), wrote:
That people think complaining about shonky service is nitpicking
rather sums up this sad little island.

It's not *that* you complain, it's the *way* you complain.

Lassie would go online and claim her £4 customer charter voucher.

Been there done that. However 4 quid doesn't make up for my wasted
time.

....so you decide to waste more of your oh-so-valuable time by moaning
about it? That makes sense.

On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:08:21 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 9, 9:03 pm, James Farrar wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:35:52 -0800 (PST), wrote:
As for the paedo reference

Eh?

You're a moron.

And you apparently can't read.

There was no "paedo reference" in the post to which you were replying.

On Dec 9, 9:17 pm, James Farrar wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:08:21 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Dec 9, 9:03 pm, James Farrar wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:35:52 -0800 (PST), wrote:
As for the paedo reference

Eh?

You're a moron.

And you apparently can't read.

There was no "paedo reference" in the post to which you were replying.

"Boltar wouldn't understand the concept of free beer ("I want
lemonade, and I
want it now!"), and probably thinks that 'sex' is something that
happens
between consenting fives and sevens. "

What do you think consenting fives and sevens is refering to? Group
sex with odd numbers? Now go find your ****ing braincell you idiot ,
it must be getting lonely by now.

B2003

On Dec 9, 9:17 pm, James Farrar wrote:
Been there done that. However 4 quid doesn't make up for my wasted
time.

...so you decide to waste more of your oh-so-valuable time by moaning
about it? That makes sense.

Well you obviously have nothing better to do than make some inane non-
reply so pot & kettle I think.

B2003

On Dec 9, 9:55 pm, Paul Corfield wrote:
I read it as a bit of obtuse humour where "sex" was really a reference
to "six" given that numerically six is between five and seven. I

Last time I looked this wasn't nz.transport - I think the actual
intention is clear and it wasn't meant as a joke so **** him.

B2003

On Dec 9, 10:51*pm, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:20:21 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Dec 9, 9:55 pm, Paul Corfield wrote:
I read it as a bit of obtuse humour where "sex" was really a reference
to "six" given that numerically six is between five and seven. I

Last time I looked this wasn't nz.transport - I think the actual
intention is clear and it wasn't meant as a joke so **** him.

I think you are *really* making something out of nothing. From what I
have seen of the "style" of Mr Heenan's posts he has a tendency to use
extreme examples or humour to try to make a point. This is a case in
point but I expect he is killing himself laughing at your very OTT
reaction.

I prefer Boltar, even though I'm a raving lefty and he thinks I am a
sad ****** etc. It's because his rantings honestly reflect his state
of mind and aren't windups or affectations.

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:51:01 +0000, Paul Corfield
wrote:

On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:20:21 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 9, 9:55 pm, Paul Corfield wrote:
I read it as a bit of obtuse humour where "sex" was really a reference
to "six" given that numerically six is between five and seven. I

Last time I looked this wasn't nz.transport - I think the actual
intention is clear and it wasn't meant as a joke so **** him.

I think you are *really* making something out of nothing. From what I
have seen of the "style" of Mr Heenan's posts he has a tendency to use
extreme examples or humour to try to make a point. This is a case in
point but I expect he is killing himself laughing at your very OTT
reaction.

Indeed, Boltar's reaction is proving the point.

On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:20:21 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 9, 9:55 pm, Paul Corfield wrote:
I read it as a bit of obtuse humour where "sex" was really a reference
to "six" given that numerically six is between five and seven. I

Last time I looked this wasn't nz.transport - I think the actual
intention is clear

Yes: it was to show you up as a humourless moron. Job done.