Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
s.com, thedarkman writes Have you read my letter and the associated mathematics? No ticket staff, no revenue protection and therefore no prosecutions for fraudulent travel, which costs millions in court time and stuff. If all the money comes from one source - Central Government - you cut out the costs associated with the other two. All of them. There is no reason for charging for travel at the time of use - it is just policy. Especially the policy of the present control-freak lot, who like to know what everyone is doing - and most tickets these days are bought in ways which allow the buyer to be identified - but previous more liberal (small "l"!) governments probably felt the same way. Consider TV licences - probably 95% of households have TV, as opposed to the (roughly) 50% of the population who use trains - but *all* governments have stubbornly refused to fund the BBC from general tax revenues. (It would be interesting to know the cost of the department which chases up non-licence-holders compared with the amount of revenue "lost".) -- Bill Borland |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 04:55:50AM -0800, Chris wrote:
Why should someone in darkest Cornwall have to pay for the costs of London (& other large cities)? (through their taxes, of course) Why should someone in London have to pay for the costs of Cornwall? Cos that's what we do right now. -- David Cantrell | Minister for Arbitrary Justice Seven o'clock in the morning is something that happens to those less fortunate than me |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() All the objections you're raising are non-economic; safety is certainly not an issue. Abolishing fares would generate massive increases in wealth for all concerned. Also check out the bigger pictu http://www.financialreform.info/ On 7 Jan, 12:11, David Cantrell wrote: On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 04:55:50AM -0800, Chris wrote: Why should someone in darkest Cornwall have to pay for the costs of London (& other large cities)? (through their taxes, of course) Why should someone in London have to pay for the costs of Cornwall? Cos that's what we do right now. -- David Cantrell | Minister for Arbitrary Justice * * Seven o'clock in the morning is something that * * happens to those less fortunate than me |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Full 2011 fares now on the TfL website (inc. NR PAYG fares) | London Transport | |||
Is the teacup necessary? | London Transport | |||
Is Woolwich really necessary - Crossrail | London Transport | |||
"Due to necessary engineering work...." | London Transport | |||
Qualifications necessary to become a station rank taxi driver | London Transport |