Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 7 Jan, 14:38, "John Rowland" wrote: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle5462099.ece Fourth thread today on uk.railway on this topic! Admittedly it's the first on uk.transport.london. Might I direct those interested in this (including utl-ers) to the uk.railway thread entitled "Parliamentary rail replacement service" started Jan 7 at 00:58 by Roy Badami. It's got lots of interesting / boring comments (delete according to taste) about this esoteric issue. Google Groups link to the aforementioned thread he http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk....e4d2e87fdc5a4/ Usenet message ID of the original post: |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Jan, 14:38, "John Rowland"
wrote: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle5462099.ece Just shows how DfT continues to micromanage every aspect of the railways. Mind you, selecting Arriva to run cross country wasn't the brightest of moves, unless profit was the only consideration. And, of course, it was. I like the G&S quote in the article: "The idiot who, in railway carriages, Scribbles on window-panes, We only suffer To ride on a buffer On Parliamentary trains" On the parliamentary buses, they ride on the rear axle. -- Andrew "If A is success in life, then A = x + y + z. Work is x; y is play; and z is keeping your mouth shut." ~ Albert Einstein |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Heenan wrote:
On 7 Jan, 14:38, "John Rowland" wrote: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle5462099.ece Just shows how DfT continues to micromanage every aspect of the railways. Mind you, selecting Arriva to run cross country wasn't the brightest of moves, unless profit was the only consideration. The route had already been effectively binned by the time AXC were given the franchise. The 'NewXC' ITT made this quite clear... Paul |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 7, 2:38*pm, "John Rowland"
wrote: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle5462099.ece Weird stuff; I would think the departure next Tuesday would be quite full. Does anyone know if one can board at Ken Olymp? And if so, where? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
``
On 8 Jan, 10:14, Offramp wrote: On Jan 7, 2:38*pm, "John Rowland" wrote: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle5462099.ece Weird stuff; I would think the departure next Tuesday would be quite full. Does anyone know if one can board at Ken Olymp? And if so, where? No - it's just between Ealing Broadway and Wandsworth Road. The idea is that the bus substitutes for a train service and covers a few stretches of line (two in the Acton/Willesden Jn area, one in Battersea) that are no longer served by a passenger train service - the pretence is that the replacement bus continues to provide a service over these lines (which is, to my mind at least, rather absurd). If you take a look at the uk.railway thread that I referred to in my earlier reply on this thread [1] then you might get some more insight into what's actually going on here that from just reading the newspaper article - in particular there's a very interesting comment from 'Andy' where he basically says that he thinks the DfT's interpretation of the law is wrong, and also that he doesn't "think that the law makes any mention of bus substitution being acceptable." [2] Agreed that after all this publicity I can well see a bunch of awkward- squad bods turning up next Tuesday to ride on it! ----- [1] "Parliamentary rail replacement service" thread on uk.railway (via GG): http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk....e4d2e87fdc5a4/ [2] Andy's specific post where he mentions this (via GG): http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk....ddf3f792bacca7 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mizter T" wrote in message
Agreed that after all this publicity I can well see a bunch of awkward- squad bods turning up next Tuesday to ride on it! If enough (fare-paying) people show up next Tuesday, I wonder if they would strengthen the service? If they need several buses to cope with this unexpected demand, will they need to put a train on to get the unwanted traffic off the busy London roads? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 Jan, 12:14, Mizter T wrote:
`` On 8 Jan, 10:14, Offramp wrote: On Jan 7, 2:38*pm, "John Rowland" wrote: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle5462099.ece Weird stuff; I would think the departure next Tuesday would be quite full. Does anyone know if one can board at Ken Olymp? And if so, where? No - it's just between Ealing Broadway and Wandsworth Road. The idea is that the bus substitutes for a train service and covers a few stretches of line (two in the Acton/Willesden Jn area, one in Battersea) that are no longer served by a passenger train service - the pretence is that the replacement bus continues to provide a service over these lines (which is, to my mind at least, rather absurd). If you take a look at the uk.railway thread that I referred to in my earlier reply on this thread [1] then you might get some more insight into what's actually going on here that from just reading the newspaper article - in particular there's a very interesting comment from 'Andy' where he basically says that he thinks the DfT's interpretation of the law is wrong, and also that he doesn't "think that the law makes any mention of bus substitution being acceptable." [2] Agreed that after all this publicity I can well see a bunch of awkward- squad bods turning up next Tuesday to ride on it! ----- [1] "Parliamentary rail replacement service" thread on uk.railway (via GG):http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk....thread/ceae4d2.... [2] Andy's specific post where he mentions this (via GG):http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk....ddf3f792bacca7 I did read the posts at the other place and that was where I saw "09:45 Ealing Broadway, 10:25 Kensington Olympia, 10:55 Wandsworth Road Returns at: 13:15Wandsworth Road 13:45 Kensington Olympia 14:25 Ealing Broadway" and I thought perhaps it stopped at K Olymp and took passengers. Also I suppose the service is free. I hope the gawkers on Tuesday 13th don't ruin it for people like me who may go later in the year as a matter of curiosity! I didn't want to travel all the way out to Ealing, and I was hoping to get on at Kensington, but I may get on at Clapham and jump off at a set of lights. Alan |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 8 Jan, 14:43, Offramp wrote: On 8 Jan, 12:14, Mizter T wrote: `` On 8 Jan, 10:14, Offramp wrote: Weird stuff; I would think the departure next Tuesday would be quite full. Does anyone know if one can board at Ken Olymp? And if so, where? No - it's just between Ealing Broadway and Wandsworth Road. The idea is that the bus substitutes for a train service and covers a few stretches of line (two in the Acton/Willesden Jn area, one in Battersea) that are no longer served by a passenger train service - the pretence is that the replacement bus continues to provide a service over these lines (which is, to my mind at least, rather absurd). If you take a look at the uk.railway thread that I referred to in my earlier reply on this thread [1] then you might get some more insight into what's actually going on here that from just reading the newspaper article - in particular there's a very interesting comment from 'Andy' where he basically says that he thinks the DfT's interpretation of the law is wrong, and also that he doesn't "think that the law makes any mention of bus substitution being acceptable." [2] Agreed that after all this publicity I can well see a bunch of awkward- squad bods turning up next Tuesday to ride on it! I did read the posts at the other place and that was where I saw "09:45 Ealing Broadway, 10:25 Kensington Olympia, 10:55 Wandsworth Road Returns at: 13:15Wandsworth Road 13:45 Kensington Olympia 14:25 Ealing Broadway" and I thought perhaps it stopped at K Olymp and took passengers. My utmost apologies - I had completely failed to notice the mention of the apparent Kensington Olympia stop in that post. If that information is correct then yes it looks like it does stop an Kensington Olympia. To be honest I think the whole interpretation of this law, if not the law itself, is a bit fuzzy, but if a replacement bus is deemed as an acceptable substitute for a railway service (which is debatable) then in a sense one could argue that it need not stop at KO. That said, stopping it at KO does perhaps emphasise the two separate areas where the bus is acting as a substitute for a train - the first to the north west of KO (the Acton/Willesden Jn area lines) and the second being the 'Ludgate Lines' south of the river. Also, the KO stop does arguably make the whole thing a little less nonsensical, at least when it comes to journeys to and from Reading - notionally a passenger from the west could change at Reading onto a service that stops at Ealing B'way, take the bus to KO and then continue their journey south on the Southern service (say to East Croydon, or changing there for Brighton). The KO to Wandsworth Road stretch however still remains pretty nonsensical in my book as AFAIAA there has never been a train service that stops at Wandsworth Road and then continues down through Brixton, Herne Hill, Tulse Hill etc towards East Croydon - so a passenger taking the replacement bus from KO to Wandsworth Rd won't then be able to recreate the route of the journey that the Crosscountry train took from Wandsworth Road to points south - sure, they can go via Peckham Rye and change, but that's not quite the same thing. Also I suppose the service is free. No, at least not officially - in effect it's a railway replacement service and in essence passengers are expected to have a ticket before they board if there were ticket issuing facilities available at the starting station. In practice whether the driver actually asks to see passengers' tickets is another matter - however I definitely don't think one should take it as a given that they won't, as given that this is an unusual service I can well imagine the driver taking an interest in their prospective passengers. I hope the gawkers on Tuesday 13th don't ruin it for people like me who may go later in the year as a matter of curiosity! I didn't want to travel all the way out to Ealing, and I was hoping to get on at Kensington, but I may get on at Clapham and jump off at a set of lights. Interesting that you place Wandsworth Road station in Clapham - to me it's in a kind of hinterland between Clapham, Battersea, Stockwell and South Lambeth. We had a discussion about it a while ago when John Rowland suggested it should be renamed if ELLX phase 2 ever happens so as to try and avoid passengers getting confused and thinking it's in Wandsworth, which it ain't - for that matter it's not in the Borough of Wandsworth either, it's just the road to Wandsworth. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Mizter T wrote:
On 8 Jan, 14:43, Offramp wrote: On 8 Jan, 12:14, Mizter T wrote: On 8 Jan, 10:14, Offramp wrote: Weird stuff Agreed that after all this publicity I can well see a bunch of awkward- squad bods turning up next Tuesday to ride on it! I hope the gawkers on Tuesday 13th don't ruin it for people like me who may go later in the year as a matter of curiosity! I didn't want to travel all the way out to Ealing, and I was hoping to get on at Kensington, but I may get on at Clapham and jump off at a set of lights. Interesting that you place Wandsworth Road station in Clapham - to me it's in a kind of hinterland between Clapham, Battersea, Stockwell and South Lambeth. We had a discussion about it a while ago Batterclapstock! tom -- Osteoclasts = monsters from the DEEP -- Andrew |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Parliamentary trains in London | London Transport | |||
Paddington to Gerrards Cross parliamentary train | London Transport | |||
Is Ealing Broadway-Ealing Common running on 10 June? | London Transport | |||
Underground at Ealing Broadway | London Transport | |||
Oyster card readers at Ealing broadway tube | London Transport |