Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:48:28 -0800 (PST),
wrote: The ordinary gates will only let one person through at a time Theoretically. I have inadvertently tailgated people through them before (where the barriers have wrongly rejected my ticket but I was moving quickly enough that I got through anyway). Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:48:28 -0800 (PST), wrote: The ordinary gates will only let one person through at a time Theoretically. I have inadvertently tailgated people through them before (where the barriers have wrongly rejected my ticket but I was moving quickly enough that I got through anyway). Inadvertently? Hmmm... But yes, two people can get through some barriers, if the second person is right up the bum of the person in front. I've done it quite a few times and it was always er... inadvertently!!! :-) |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:01:06 GMT,
Neil Williams wrote: On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:48:28 -0800 (PST), wrote: The ordinary gates will only let one person through at a time Theoretically. I have inadvertently tailgated people through them before (where the barriers have wrongly rejected my ticket but I was moving quickly enough that I got through anyway). Are you sure you didn't go through on the ticket of the person behind you (leaving them stranded)? If people are going though quickly, the barriers don't actually close. The person with the bad ticket will have picked it back up just as the barrier closes and the person behind will feed their ticket in. (My partner has been caught out twice in recent months by this - it's particularly a problem at weekends where you've got a mixture of regulars who feed their ticket in as fast as possible and irregulars who don't quite know what they are doing - either that or somehow people with dodgy tickets see my partner as an easy mark). On the first time she was left "trainside" with no ticket, on the second occasion she was using oyster so at least she still had her card. Tim. -- God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light. http://www.woodall.me.uk/ |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Mizter T wrote: ... I dunno about the official rules but they also seem to be used sometimes by adults with a small accompanying child in tow, the latter of course travels for free if they are under 11. The ordinary gates will only let one person through at a time, so children without their own ticket *must* use the wide / manual gates or they get squished. I've never seen a dog get squished in the gates though, despite having twice as many legs as most children, which I think is proof that dogs are more intelligent than children. Owain In dog years a child is a 3 month old puppy but you expect them to show all the intelligence of an adult. Kevin |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DERWENT "can I see your ticket please sir?"
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:36:07 -0000, "Stephen O'Connell" Neil Williams wrote: On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:48:28 -0800 (PST), wrote: The ordinary gates will only let one person through at a time Theoretically. I have inadvertently tailgated people through them before (where the barriers have wrongly rejected my ticket but I was moving quickly enough that I got through anyway). Inadvertently? Hmmm... But yes, two people can get through some barriers, if the second person is right up the bum of the person in front. I've done it quite a few times and it was always er... inadvertently!!! :-) The trick with this is that the second person should have the ticket. PRAR -- http://www.i.am/prar/ and http://prar.fotopic.net/ As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it. --Dick Cavett Please reply to the newsgroup. That is why it exists. NB Anti-spam measures in force - If you must email me use the Reply to address and not |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 3, 8:44*am, PRAR wrote:
The trick with this is that the second person should have the ticket. That can introduce the risk of one customer reported for total evasion and one for aiding and abetting. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DERWENT "can I see your ticket please sir?"
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:02:27 -0800 (PST), Offramp On Feb 3, 8:44*am, PRAR wrote: The trick with this is that the second person should have the ticket. That can introduce the risk of one customer reported for total evasion and one for aiding and abetting. Indeed. I was caught out this way today. Woman in front of me motioned at the reader, I followed her and swiped out. Gates opened for her then sprang back and grabbed me. Turned out that she was let out on my swipe as her's hadn't registered or had been rejected. All very annoying. PRAR -- http://www.i.am/prar/ and http://prar.fotopic.net/ As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it. --Dick Cavett Please reply to the newsgroup. That is why it exists. NB Anti-spam measures in force - If you must email me use the Reply to address and not |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Did you see the mocumentary "Twenty-Twelve"? | London Transport | |||
That Jubilee meltdown again: can you see what is wrong with this picture? | London Transport | |||
Sir Terry Farrell backs Euston as venue for London high speedrail hub | London Transport | |||
Nifty has good support at 4800 below which we can see 4650-4500 | London Transport | |||
Check to see if you have any impending speeding tickets coming your way | London Transport |