![]() |
Where is the "Way Out"
Recently had to use KX (Piccadilly Line) and noticed that on both platforms
there were NO "Way Out" signs. well thats a bit of a fib really as there were a couple, but these were in the smallest font and placed just above a roundel that was on the wall and was VERY DIFFICULT to see. All the other signs like "Metrpolitan/Northern etc signs were all along the platform - just almost no sign of the "Way Out". I know the platforms are being done up but surely the most important sign of them all should be clearly visible to everyone! I put this to the test when i revisited with a friend and asked him to tell me where "Way Out" signs were on the platform as we walked from one end to the other. We had just walked past 3 and he was still saying "cant see any yet" and then i pointed them out. |
Where is the "Way Out"
On Feb 7, 1:15 am, James Farrar wrote:
Do they? The staff boxes at gatelines say "way in" and all other signage says either "Trains" or the name(s) of the line(s) served, IIRC. I'll have to check , I remember seeing "entrance". Maybe I'm wrong. B2003 |
Where is the "Way Out"
In message , James
Farrar writes Good question. It used to be ubiquitous on the railways too, but some TOCs have started using "Exit" on their signage. To digress a little, some of the Sonias have replaced "alight here for" with "exit for", which really grates on my ears. We had a train driver on the Hertford to Moorgate run one morning who talked of stations as being "Next Up". i.e. Next up we have Finsbury Park, alight here for....... It sounded strange at first, but after a while it sounded better than the usual "The next station is". -- Edward Cowling "Last Austral-B Heretic !!" |
Where is the "Way Out"
On 6 Feb, 20:07, wrote:
On Feb 6, 7:56 pm, "Frank Incense" wrote: Recently had to use KX (Piccadilly Line) *and noticed that on both platforms there were NO "Way Out" signs. *well thats a bit of a fib really as there Anyone know why the tube uses "way out" instead of "exit" like almost everywhere else? And why do they use "entrance" instead of "way in"? B2003 Well It's not the station exit, it's the way to the exit, which can lead to another 200 yards of walking in some stations |
Where is the "Way Out"
On Feb 8, 1:37 pm, Paul Weaver wrote:
Well It's not the station exit, it's the way to the exit, which can lead to another 200 yards of walking in some stations Thats why you have an arrow next to the word, which kind of gives a clue that the exit is over there - :) B2003 |
Where is the "Way Out"
On 8 Feb, 19:38, wrote:
On Feb 8, 1:37 pm, Paul Weaver wrote: Well It's not the station exit, it's the way to the exit, which can lead to another 200 yards of walking in some stations Thats why you have an arrow next to the word, which kind of gives a clue that the exit is over there - :) But it isn't - it's over there - then up ^ the lift then over there - then through the barrier, and then you have to choose _which_ exit... So the platform signage should say "Exits" :) I suspect it's Victorian pedantry that's been preserved to ensure consistency, else you'd have to change all the signs at once. Could a second reason for keeping it be that it makes it easier to distinguish fire exits from normal routes, especially with all the stuff now sticking out of Tube station walls and obstructing the signs? Hth Henry |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk