London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO! (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/7575-east-london-line-phase-2b.html)

andrewcunard@googlemail.com February 16th 09 03:42 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
On Feb 13, 4:04*pm, Mr Thant
wrote:
On 13 Feb, 15:41, "Paul Scott" wrote:

Another point that isn't clear, is what happens when the extra 4 tph from
Clapham Junction via the SLL, and the extra 2 tph peak only trains to/from
Crystal Palace enter the mix. *AFAICT that could mean up to 14 tph extended
to H&I, as there only ever seems to be New Cross - Dalston Junction
terminators mentioned...


It's been stated that the West Croydons will terminate at Dalston
Junction with New Crosses and Crystal Palaces running through. I don't
know how the peak extras or the phase 2 trains fit into this.

U


Please forgive me for asking a couple of dumb questions, but I can
easily see that I do not know this subject matter nearly as well as
the rest of you:

1) Has anybody heard anything on a North Battersea station for the
ELLX? If so, where would be the proposed location? At the end of
Culvert Road where it deadends into the train tracks (actually, there
is then an automobile tunnel under the first set of tracks, and then a
foot path over the second set of tracks. Is that anybody has proposed
it?

2) At Clapham Junction, is the platform entirely already there? Or
would there have to be some construction work?

3) I've been reading about this proposed "once-weekly" train from
Ealing Broadway to Wandsworth - the first question that comes to my
untrained mind is, "What in the world good is a once-weekly train
service???"

4) And I guess from Mr Thant's post, that nobody knows of the Phase 2
trains from Clapham Junction will deadend at Surrey Quays or keep on
going - surely they have this all figured out by now??? (years ago???)

Thanks in advance for any answers/comments. Glad I found this forum.

Mizter T February 16th 09 05:33 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 

On 16 Feb, 16:42, wrote:

On Feb 13, 4:04*pm, Mr Thant
wrote:

On 13 Feb, 15:41, "Paul Scott" wrote:


Another point that isn't clear, is what happens when the extra 4 tph from
Clapham Junction via the SLL, and the extra 2 tph peak only trains to/from
Crystal Palace enter the mix. *AFAICT that could mean up to 14 tph extended
to H&I, as there only ever seems to be New Cross - Dalston Junction
terminators mentioned...


It's been stated that the West Croydons will terminate at Dalston
Junction with New Crosses and Crystal Palaces running through. I don't
know how the peak extras or the phase 2 trains fit into this.


U


Please forgive me for asking a couple of dumb questions, but I can
easily see that I do not know this subject matter nearly as well as
the rest of you:

1) *Has anybody heard anything on a North Battersea station for the
ELLX? *If so, where would be the proposed location? *At the end of
Culvert Road where it deadends into the train tracks (actually, there
is then an automobile tunnel under the first set of tracks, and then a
foot path over the second set of tracks. *Is that anybody has proposed
it?


A North Battersea/ Battersea High Street station is not seriously on
the agenda whatsoever.

One did exist between 1863 - 1940, see:
http://www.abandonedstations.org.uk/...ndon_Line.html


2) *At Clapham Junction, is the platform entirely already there? *Or
would there have to be some construction work?


Platform 1 has to be reinstated - this will require work to the deck
it sits on. Platform 1 is the other side of the island platform from
platform 2 (obvious I suppose!), which is the platform currently used
by the LO/ WLL trains today. There were some rumours that cost cutting
meant they were going to try and both the whole ELLX and WLL services
from a single platform (p2) but this would be insane, asking for
trouble and essentially unworkable - the scheme needs p1 to be
reinstated.


3) *I've been reading about this proposed "once-weekly" train from
Ealing Broadway to Wandsworth - the first question that comes to my
untrained mind is, "What in the world good is a once-weekly train
service???"


A long story! Basically it would exist to fulfil legal obligations,
nothing more, just like the rail replacement bus supposedly currently
does (though it's arguably legally dubious).


4) *And I guess from Mr Thant's post, that nobody knows of the Phase 2
trains from Clapham Junction will deadend at Surrey Quays or keep on
going - surely they have this all figured out by now??? (years ago???)


No - the ELLX trains from Clapham Jn would continue at least as far as
Dalston Junction, possibly on to Highbury & Islington. No trains would
terminate at Surrey Quays.

PRAR February 16th 09 06:59 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
DERWENT East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:33:12 -0800 (PST), Mizter T


On 16 Feb, 16:42, wrote:

On Feb 13, 4:04*pm, Mr Thant
wrote:


2) *At Clapham Junction, is the platform entirely already there? *Or
would there have to be some construction work?


Platform 1 has to be reinstated - this will require work to the deck
it sits on. Platform 1 is the other side of the island platform from
platform 2 (obvious I suppose!), which is the platform currently used
by the LO/ WLL trains today. There were some rumours that cost cutting
meant they were going to try and both the whole ELLX and WLL services
from a single platform (p2) but this would be insane, asking for
trouble and essentially unworkable - the scheme needs p1 to be
reinstated.


There's a whole load of signalling equipment installed in that space
which will need to be moved to new homes.


PRAR
--
http://www.i.am/prar/ and http://prar.fotopic.net/
As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it. --Dick Cavett
Please reply to the newsgroup. That is why it exists.
NB Anti-spam measures in force
- If you must email me use the Reply to address and not

westchestersalerno@gmail.com February 16th 09 07:07 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
On Feb 16, 6:33*pm, Mizter T wrote:
On 16 Feb, 16:42, wrote:



On Feb 13, 4:04*pm, Mr Thant
wrote:


On 13 Feb, 15:41, "Paul Scott" wrote:


Another point that isn't clear, is what happens when the extra 4 tph from
Clapham Junction via the SLL, and the extra 2 tph peak only trains to/from
Crystal Palace enter the mix. *AFAICT that could mean up to 14 tph extended
to H&I, as there only ever seems to be New Cross - Dalston Junction
terminators mentioned...


It's been stated that the West Croydons will terminate at Dalston
Junction with New Crosses and Crystal Palaces running through. I don't
know how the peak extras or the phase 2 trains fit into this.


U


Please forgive me for asking a couple of dumb questions, but I can
easily see that I do not know this subject matter nearly as well as
the rest of you:


1) *Has anybody heard anything on a North Battersea station for the
ELLX? *If so, where would be the proposed location? *At the end of
Culvert Road where it deadends into the train tracks (actually, there
is then an automobile tunnel under the first set of tracks, and then a
foot path over the second set of tracks. *Is that anybody has proposed
it?


A North Battersea/ Battersea High Street station is not seriously on
the agenda whatsoever.

One did exist between 1863 - 1940, see:http://www.abandonedstations.org.uk/...ndon_Line.html



2) *At Clapham Junction, is the platform entirely already there? *Or
would there have to be some construction work?


Platform 1 has to be reinstated - this will require work to the deck
it sits on. Platform 1 is the other side of the island platform from
platform 2 (obvious I suppose!), which is the platform currently used
by the LO/ WLL trains today. There were some rumours that cost cutting
meant they were going to try and both the whole ELLX and WLL services
from a single platform (p2) but this would be insane, asking for
trouble and essentially unworkable - the scheme needs p1 to be
reinstated.



3) *I've been reading about this proposed "once-weekly" train from
Ealing Broadway to Wandsworth - the first question that comes to my
untrained mind is, "What in the world good is a once-weekly train
service???"


A long story! Basically it would exist to fulfil legal obligations,
nothing more, just like the rail replacement bus supposedly currently
does (though it's arguably legally dubious).



4) *And I guess from Mr Thant's post, that nobody knows of the Phase 2
trains from Clapham Junction will deadend at Surrey Quays or keep on
going - surely they have this all figured out by now??? (years ago???)


No - the ELLX trains from Clapham Jn would continue at least as far as
Dalston Junction, possibly on to Highbury & Islington. No trains would
terminate at Surrey Quays.


Thanks for that. I just have two more short questions if you don't
mind:

(1) No, the "North Battersea" station that I am referring to (or the
"supposedly proposed North Battersea station") would be located he

http://www.multimap.com/maps/?qs=Culvert+Road%2C+London&countryCode=GB#map=51.4 7047,-0.15918|17|4&bd=useful_information&loc=GB:51.47135 :-0.15843:17|Culvert%20Road,%20London|Culvert%20Road ,%20London,%20England,%20SW11%205

Do you see where Culvert Road goes under/over the tracks and then
meets up with Eversleigh Road (actually, it doesn't actually meet up -
the final part is a footbridge over the last set of tracks). I know a
guy down the street from me who says his girlfriend works at some
architect's office where they have drawn up some plans (might just be
some basic drawings - I don't know) for just such a station/stop/
platform (i.e., I'm not talking about the old Battersea High Street
station. This station is already on the selected route/track and just
would require extra money (who knows where that would come from).
Have you heard anything about this??? I'm sure it's a pipedream until
somebody comes up with the money, and in these tight times, it ain't
gonna happen.lll

(2) With regards to the ELLX trains going from Clapham Junction and
continuing on as far as Dalston Junction - that sounds great - it
would finally make the Clapham Junction area excellent for commuting
to the City (Shoredtich station, which is walkable to the City). But
my question concerns the "Liverpool Street Station" spur that I see on
the map on Wikipedia. And it has this pictu

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sh...verpool_St.jpg

Would a commuter from Clapham Junction be able to go direct to
Liverpool Street station? Or would the commuter have to switch to
that spur that I see in that picture? Or would the commuter have to
walk/take the bus. I'm trying to assess the accessability for
commuting to the City. Commuting to Canary Wharf looks excellent
(streets ahead of the current mess of grabbing a packed train to
Waterloo, then walking a mile to get to the Jubilee Line and then get
on another packed train which takes ages to get to Canary Wharf.

Thanks in advance.

Paul Scott February 16th 09 07:31 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
wrote:

Thanks for that. I just have two more short questions if you don't
mind:

(2) With regards to the ELLX trains going from Clapham Junction and
continuing on as far as Dalston Junction - that sounds great - it
would finally make the Clapham Junction area excellent for commuting
to the City (Shoredtich station, which is walkable to the City). But
my question concerns the "Liverpool Street Station" spur that I see on
the map on Wikipedia. And it has this pictu

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sh...verpool_St.jpg

Would a commuter from Clapham Junction be able to go direct to
Liverpool Street station? Or would the commuter have to switch to
that spur that I see in that picture?


That picture is well out of date, [no doubt someone will shortly tell us
exactly when the track was lifted connecting the LU ELL to Liverpool St -
1970s?], the new build Overground ELL rises up to the east of the closed
Shoreditch station (pictured) and crosses the Liverpool Street lines on a
new high level approach, over the infamous GE19 bridge that collapsed last
year while being positioned.

Paul



Lüko Willms February 16th 09 07:33 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
Am Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:42:37 UTC, schrieb
auf uk.railway :

3) I've been reading about this proposed "once-weekly" train from
Ealing Broadway to Wandsworth - the first question that comes to my
untrained mind is, "What in the world good is a once-weekly train
service???"


Going to church or Sunday school?


Cheers,
L.W.

-- -----------------------------------------------------


No Name February 16th 09 07:34 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
In article
,
wrote:
(2) With regards to the ELLX trains going from Clapham Junction and
continuing on as far as Dalston Junction - that sounds great - it
would finally make the Clapham Junction area excellent for commuting
to the City (Shoredtich station, which is walkable to the City). But
my question concerns the "Liverpool Street Station" spur that I see on
the map on Wikipedia. And it has this pictu


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sh...verpool_St.jpg


Would a commuter from Clapham Junction be able to go direct to
Liverpool Street station? Or would the commuter have to switch to
that spur that I see in that picture?


That spur was taken out many years ago and is not going to be replaced.

--
David Wild using RISC OS on broadband
www.davidhwild.me.uk

sweek February 16th 09 07:47 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
If Clapham Junction to Canary Wharf really is going to be faster than
the via Waterloo route, I think it'll do the line more bad than good
because it will be absolutely packed from opening.

Recliner[_2_] February 16th 09 07:52 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
"Lüko Willms" wrote in message

Am Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:42:37 UTC, schrieb
auf uk.railway :

3) I've been reading about this proposed "once-weekly" train from
Ealing Broadway to Wandsworth - the first question that comes to my
untrained mind is, "What in the world good is a once-weekly train
service???"


Going to church or Sunday school?


On Tuesdays?



Jamie Thompson February 16th 09 07:59 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
On Feb 16, 8:47*pm, sweek wrote:
If Clapham Junction to Canary Wharf really is going to be faster than
the via Waterloo route, I think it'll do the line more bad than good
because it will be absolutely packed from opening.


Well, if it becomes packed it might just justify longer trains then :)

Paul Scott February 16th 09 08:07 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
Jamie Thompson wrote:
On Feb 16, 8:47 pm, sweek wrote:
If Clapham Junction to Canary Wharf really is going to be faster than
the via Waterloo route, I think it'll do the line more bad than good
because it will be absolutely packed from opening.


Well, if it becomes packed it might just justify longer trains then :)


Difficult to have longer trains without a total rebuild of Surrey Quays,
Wapping, and Rotherhithe at least. Which would be on the far too difficult
list unless I'm mistaken. SDO would not be practical in the core part of
the route, so it has been proposed in the past that the deep stations would
close rather than be lengthened.

Paul



Arthur Figgis February 16th 09 08:08 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
Recliner wrote:
"Lüko Willms" wrote in message

Am Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:42:37 UTC, schrieb
auf uk.railway :

3) I've been reading about this proposed "once-weekly" train from
Ealing Broadway to Wandsworth - the first question that comes to my
untrained mind is, "What in the world good is a once-weekly train
service???"

Going to church or Sunday school?


On Tuesdays?


Well, wouldn't you burn in Hell [1] if you travelled by train on the
/Sunday/?


[1] No, not the one in Norway.
--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK

andrewcunard@googlemail.com February 16th 09 08:49 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
On Feb 16, 8:47*pm, sweek wrote:
If Clapham Junction to Canary Wharf really is going to be faster than
the via Waterloo route, I think it'll do the line more bad than good
because it will be absolutely packed from opening.


Sweek,

Surely the ELLX from Clapham Junction to Canada Water will be faster
than going into Waterloo and then changing to the Jubilee line - I
mean, the trains all slow down in rush hour in the morning coming into
Waterloo because they have to find an empty platform. And then you've
got that quarter-mile hike to the Jubilee line amongst great masses of
humanity, and then you're on an Underground line which runs slower
than a BR train. But even if it were the same speed, people will
still opt for the ELLX because of the sweat factor, i.e. if you are on
the ELLX then you will be on an air-conditioned train car, and you
won't have to get sweated up in the summer by doing the hike to the
Jubilee line. I agree with you - the ELLX will be jam-packed from Day
One. And that doesn't even consider the fact that if you are
travelling from Clapham Junction to Liverpool Street station that the
ELLX would be a HUGE advantage of the current method of getting there
(i.e. slow train into Waterloo, hike to Waterloo to City line, wait in
line, sweat yourself out while you take the tube to Bank, then you've
got to get to Liverpool Street station on the Central line - makes
more sense to just take the ELLX to Shoreditch - while sitting down
and in an air-conditioned car all the way. I tell you, it will be jam-
packed from Day One. Given that there will only be 4tph, I figure
there won't be any room to get on the ELLX by the first stop it makes
(Queenstown Road) - after all, nobody is going to get OFF at
Queenstown Road. It will be mayhem. And bankers and yuppies will
finally consider the Clapham Junction area to be commutable to the
City, so more of those people (like me) will live in the area and that
will make it even worse. I plan to continue bicycling to Canary Wharf.

andrewcunard@googlemail.com February 16th 09 09:02 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
More to the point, I bet you dollars to donuts that - once it is up
and running - that if you did a cost-benefit analysis for having a
station/stop at Brixton, it wouldn't be justified. Why? Because the
line will basically be unusable to residents of Brixton during the
morning rush hour - after all, very few people are going to be getting
OFF at Brixton, so there won't be any space for people to get ON. I
figure a lot of the stops are going to be unusable. If figure the
ELLX Phase 2 will basically be a great present for City and Canary
Wharf workers who live around Clapham Junction. Largely unusable for
everyone else (other times, yes, but during morning rush hour, no -
will be 90% used by City workers that get on at Clapham Junction).
The biggest benefit (I think) will be the lessening of traffic at
Waterloo, on the Waterloo & City line, and on the Jubilee line (until
you get to Canada Water).

Paul Scott February 16th 09 09:13 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
wrote:

...... Given that there will only be 4tph, I figure
there won't be any room to get on the ELLX by the first stop it makes
(Queenstown Road) - after all, nobody is going to get OFF at
Queenstown Road.


You haven't got the route right - a train leaving CJ for the SLL can't go
through Queenstown Rd, it will have taken the route from CJ Platform 2 down
and under the SW lines and will approach Wansworth Rd via Longhedge
Junctions, the lines on the other side of the SW lines (and underneath the
lines into Victoria).

Paul S




andrewcunard@googlemail.com February 16th 09 09:21 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
Yes, I stand corrrected - I should have said "Wandsworth Road" and not
"Queenstown Road" (I don't know these stops very well because I don't
use any trains from Clapham Junction to work at the moment) - I WILL
try it out when it first opens in 2012. If I can get a seat each
morning, I will ditch my bicycle and go from Clapham Junction to
Canada Water and then to Canary Wharf.

Sorry for the mistake.

EE507[_2_] February 16th 09 10:13 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
On Feb 16, 9:49*pm, wrote:
On Feb 16, 8:47*pm, sweek wrote:

If Clapham Junction to Canary Wharf really is going to be faster than
the via Waterloo route, I think it'll do the line more bad than good
because it will be absolutely packed from opening.


Sweek,

makes
more sense to just take the ELLX to Shoreditch - while sitting down
and in an air-conditioned car all the way.


Sitting? Have you seen the interior layout?

http://www.railwayherald.co.uk/issue...148.pdf#page=5

andrewcunard@googlemail.com February 17th 09 06:07 AM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
On Feb 16, 11:13*pm, EE507 wrote:
On Feb 16, 9:49*pm, wrote:

On Feb 16, 8:47*pm, sweek wrote:


If Clapham Junction to Canary Wharf really is going to be faster than
the via Waterloo route, I think it'll do the line more bad than good
because it will be absolutely packed from opening.


Sweek,


makes
more sense to just take the ELLX to Shoreditch - while sitting down
and in an air-conditioned car all the way.


Sitting? Have you seen the interior layout?

http://www.railwayherald.co.uk/issue...148.pdf#page=5


Man, that's a stinker. Obviously, what is going to happen, is, just
after the last train leaves, people are going to begin gathering at
EXACTLY the right places on the Clapham Junction platform where they
KNOW the door opens, in order to be one of the first ones in to grab a
seat, thus, in order to get a seat the whole way from Clapham to
Shoreditch/Canada Water, one will have to spend 15 minutes standing
anyway (either in the heat, or the freezing cold) - and to get the
seat, one would have to add almost 15 minutes to one's journey (to
make sure you get there in time for when the prior train leaves. What
a stinker! My guess is, the planners knew from the get-go that 4tph
just wouldn't cut it - that that's basically a token service, and that
it is going to be jam-packed from Day One, starting at the first
station (Clapham Junction), so they took out as many seats as possible
in order to pack as many people in like sardines. Looks like I'm
going to stick with bicycling to Canary Wharf - at lesat that way I
get a seat to sit on the whole way.

Peter Masson February 17th 09 08:48 AM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 

wrote

My guess is, the planners knew from the get-go that 4tph
just wouldn't cut it - that that's basically a token service, and that
it is going to be jam-packed from Day One, starting at the first
station (Clapham Junction), so they took out as many seats as possible
in order to pack as many people in like sardines. Looks like I'm
going to stick with bicycling to Canary Wharf - at lesat that way I
get a seat to sit on the whole way.


The existing SLL serevice (Victoria - London Bridge) is half-hourly with
2-coach trains, and even in the peaks most passengers get a seat. I am sure
that the ELLX phase 2b service will be well used, but I wouldn't expect it
to be jam-packed. Off-peak everyone who wants one will get a seat, with
plenty of space for bikes and buggies, while in the peaks passengers who
have to stand will, I would expect, have a reasonable space.

It won't be anything like the quickest route from Clapham Junction to Canary
Wharf (via Canada Water) or the City (via Whitechapel or walk from
Shoreditch High Street) - going via Wazterloo will be much quicker - though
the ELLX route will avoid a Zone 1 fare.

Peter



Andrew Heenan February 17th 09 08:55 AM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
"sweek" wrote ...
If Clapham Junction to Canary Wharf really is going to be faster than
the via Waterloo route, I think it'll do the line more bad than good
because it will be absolutely packed from opening.


It'll almost certainly be quicker, and that's just one of the 'untapped'
sources of travel that the overground will reveal.

It'll be worth saving details of the proposed service pattern, and comparing
that with what happens within a year or two of opening. I suspect that there
will be increased sercies on sevral sections, and the 'old' East London Line
will be much, much busier that it used to be.

But even the proposed service levels are much higher than the previous
levels, so they may cope!
--

Andrew

"She plays the tuba.
It is the only instrument capable
of imitating a distress call."



Andrew Heenan February 17th 09 08:56 AM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
"Recliner" wrote :
3) I've been reading about this proposed "once-weekly" train from
Ealing Broadway to Wandsworth - the first question that comes to my
untrained mind is, "What in the world good is a once-weekly train
service???"

Going to church or Sunday school?

On Tuesdays?


Sunday's Sunday schools is a tad overbooked!



Paul Scott February 17th 09 11:01 AM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
wrote:
On Feb 16, 11:13 pm, EE507 wrote:


Sitting? Have you seen the interior layout?

http://www.railwayherald.co.uk/issue...148.pdf#page=5

Man, that's a stinker. Obviously, what is going to happen, is, just
after the last train leaves, people are going to begin gathering at
EXACTLY the right places on the Clapham Junction platform where they
KNOW the door opens...


I suspect the layout choice was based on the perceived success of recent LU
tube stock, and the apparent belief in TfL that if the Overground could be
'improved to meet the standards of LU services' everyone would flock to it.
The same reasoning results in it being on the tube map. So the implication
is that passengers will be happy with tube style internal conditions, with a
vehicle capacity of 166 (with 30 odd seats) declared.

Paul





andrewcunard@googlemail.com February 17th 09 11:06 AM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
On Feb 17, 9:48*am, "Peter Masson" wrote:
wrote

My guess is, the planners knew from the get-go that 4tph
just wouldn't cut it - that that's basically a token service, and that
it is going to be jam-packed from Day One, starting at the first
station (Clapham Junction), so they took out as many seats as possible
in order to pack as many people in like sardines. *Looks like I'm
going to stick with bicycling to Canary Wharf - at lesat that way I
get a seat to sit on the whole way.


The existing SLL serevice (Victoria - London Bridge) is half-hourly with
2-coach trains, and even in the peaks most passengers get a seat. I am sure
that the ELLX phase 2b service will be well used, but I wouldn't expect it
to be jam-packed. Off-peak everyone who wants one will get a seat, with
plenty of space for bikes and buggies, while in the peaks passengers who
have to stand will, I would expect, have a reasonable space.

It won't be anything like the quickest route from Clapham Junction to Canary
Wharf (via Canada Water) or the City (via Whitechapel or walk from
Shoreditch High Street) - going via Wazterloo will be much quicker - though
the ELLX route will avoid a Zone 1 fare.

Peter


Peter, I wouldn't even begin to compare the current Victoria - London
Bridge service to the ELLX phase 2. And the Victoria - London Bridge
Service was almost NEVER used by commuters going to Canary Wharf - I
should know, because I live within walking distance of Battersea
Bridge station and so I checked it out a couple of times to get to
Canary Wharf. This was my experience: Lovely ride from Battersea
Bridge to London Bridge - always got a seat - passenger cars fairly
empty most of the way (this alone told me that it wasn't being used by
City/Canary Wharf commuters - if not, where were they???). But then I
got to London Bridge . . . . . . . a HUGE hike to the Jubilee line.
Packed to the gills. Sometimes couldn't get one first train. Stuffy
standing-up ride for two stops to get to Canada Water (where the ELLX
will meet), and then the final leg to Canary Wharf. I said, "Never
again" and took to my bicycle. Oh, and because it was a half-hourly
service, if you missed the train . . . . . well, you had to wait a
half hour for the next one (made more sense at that point to take the
next train to Victoria and then hop on a District/Circle line to
Westminster and then once again get on that jam-packed Jubilee line.
Peter, I can assure you, no banker used that Victoria - London Bridge
half-hourly service to get to the City/Canary Wharf.

As for the fastest route being to go direct into Waterloo . . . . . I
can see that being true for somebody who is already on a Waterloo-
bound train (say, he is travelling in from Esher in Surrey), then,
sure, it doesn't make sense for him to get off his Waterloo-bound
train and wait for another train (the ELLX) - that makes no sense.
But for somebody who lives around Clapham Junction, it makes more
sense to arrive in time to board the new ELLX and go direct to the
City/Canada Water. Also depends on where you work in the City. If
you work at the huge Broadgate complex, or anywhere along Bishopsgate,
the ELLX will make the most sense. Obviously, if you work near the
Bank entrance, then the Waterloo & City line might make more sense.
But most of the big banks are centered around Broadgate/Bishopsgate,
and the whole Waterloo route is a nightmare (trains slow down coming
into Waterloo, then you disembark in a huge crowd and have to stand in
a huge queue for the Waterloo & City line and it's never pleasant
being packed together like sardines like that, and then there is
another crush of people at the Bank end of things. I shudder whenever
I think about it - I did enough times to chuck it in and get on my
bicycle. Again, I'm just speaking for someone who lives near Clapham
Junction - obviously for someone living in Esher or Richmond,
bicycling in is not an option. I still think the ELLX phase 2 will be
packed full starting at Clapham Junction - the appeal of being able to
just take one train (no exhanges to other trains) - and an air-
conditioned train - all the way to either the City (Shoreditch), or
Canada Water (just 1 stop from Canary Wharf) has enormous appeal. I
think the ELLX is a wonderful gift to those of us who live near
Clapham Junction.

Peter Masson February 17th 09 11:27 AM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 

wrote

I still think the ELLX phase 2 will be
packed full starting at Clapham Junction - the appeal of being able to
just take one train (no exhanges to other trains) - and an air-
conditioned train - all the way to either the City (Shoreditch), or
Canada Water (just 1 stop from Canary Wharf) has enormous appeal. I
think the ELLX is a wonderful gift to those of us who live near
Clapham Junction.


I'm sure it will be popular, though I still think that, except perhaps for
two or three peak trains, it won't be packed to the point of discomfort.
Though I've just done some calculations - I think you're right that it will
be as quick for a journey to Canary Wharf, starting at Clapham Junction, as
going via Waterloo, and almost as quick to the City (assuming a final
destination equidistant from Bank and Shoreditch High Street, the last bit
being done on foot).

Peter



andrewcunard@googlemail.com February 17th 09 03:51 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
On Feb 17, 12:27*pm, "Peter Masson" wrote:
wrote

I still think the ELLX phase 2 will be
packed full starting at Clapham Junction - the appeal of being able to
just take one train (no exhanges to other trains) - and an air-
conditioned train - all the way to either the City (Shoreditch), or
Canada Water (just 1 stop from Canary Wharf) has enormous appeal. *I
think the ELLX is a wonderful gift to those of us who live near
Clapham Junction.


I'm sure it will be popular, though I still think that, except perhaps for
two or three peak trains, it won't be packed to the point of discomfort.
Though I've just done some calculations - I think you're right that it will
be as quick for a journey to Canary Wharf, starting at Clapham Junction, as
going via Waterloo, and almost as quick to the City (assuming a final
destination equidistant from Bank and Shoreditch High Street, the last bit
being done on foot).

Peter


Peter, when looked at that way, I would say that commuters would pick
the ELLX over Waterloo hands-down every time - why? - because of 2
reasons: (1) the commuter would never choose to make the unpleasant
hike at Waterloo - just makes you get hot and sweaty, and (2) once you
are on the Waterloo & City line, you are no longer on an air-
conditioned train so why get off the air-conditioned ELLX??? Also,
that unpleasant hike at Waterloo - that is also done in an unair-
conditioned environment. Also, if one is working in the City, then
one could easily take one of the many buses at Shoreditch heading
towards Broadgate/Bishopsgate - getting buses at Bank is a pain in the
rear (not enough of them - streets are too narrow) and seems to take
time. Just my thoughts as a commuter.

andrewcunard@googlemail.com February 17th 09 04:09 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
Hate to keep on posting, but the more that I think about it, I think
you are partially correct - the City worker that works around Bank and
west of there will choose your Waterloo/Bank route. But any City
worker that works anywhere along the buildings along Bishopsgate (and
that's where all the tall/large buildings are, think the Broadgate
complex, that new Heron Tower monstrosity (due to be the tallest
building in London, already under construction), the "Bishopsgate
Tower" now under construction, Tower 42, etc - they are all over by
Bishopsgate - or even further east (think the Gherkin Building (the
Pineapple building), the Commercial Union building, Lloyds of London,
etc) - if you don't want to hike, then a bus down Bishopsgate sounds
appealing.

rosenstiel@cix.compulink.co.uk February 17th 09 04:49 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
In article
,
() wrote:

I live within walking distance of Battersea Bridge station


Where?!

--
Colin Rosenstiel

andrewcunard@googlemail.com February 17th 09 05:10 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
On Feb 17, 5:49*pm, wrote:
In article
,

() wrote:
I live within walking distance of Battersea Bridge station


Where?!

--
Colin Rosenstiel


I just had a nice chat with Colin, and I now realise that I should
have been saying "Battersea Park station" and not "Battersea BRIDGE
station".

rosenstiel@cix.compulink.co.uk February 17th 09 06:03 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
In article
,
() wrote:

On Feb 17, 5:49*pm, wrote:
In article

,

() wrote:
I live within walking distance of Battersea Bridge station


Where?!


I just had a nice chat with Colin, and I now realise that I should
have been saying "Battersea Park station" and not "Battersea BRIDGE
station".


:-)

--
Colin Rosenstiel

Batman55 February 17th 09 09:49 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 

"Mizter T" wrote in message
...

On 12 Feb, 16:15, "Batman55" wrote:

"Mizter T" wrote:

http://www.london.gov.uk/view_press_...eleaseid=20938


Snip


Funny, whilst on a trip today from Bromley via Clapham Jn, Willesden,
Gospel
Oak and Barking (yes I am!) and back to Bromley, I wondered why they
don't
switch the SL service from London Bridge at Wandsworth Road to Olympia
(or
some sensible point along the WLL)? Solves DH problem and gives another
way
of avoiding central London.


Er, that wouldn't actually solve anything I'm afraid to say - the SLL
service is being evicted from London Bridge and is essentially being
replaced by the ELLX to Clapham Jn plus by a possible new Victoria -
Peckham Rye - Bellingham service calling at all stations (except
Battersea Park).

This problem we keep hearing about with capacity at London Bridge, yet there
is at least a 2 platform space on the SW side of the station , now occupied
by cars. Not 12 cars maybe, but why cannot this be restored?

MaxB



Andrew Heenan February 18th 09 08:24 AM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
Commuters may also favour one train rather than two, even when the change is
fairly easy.
--
Andrew


If you stand up and be counted,
From time to time you may get yourself knocked down.
But remember this:
A man flattened by an opponent can get up again.
A man flattened by conformity stays down for good.
- Thomas J. Watson Jr.



Matthew Dickinson February 18th 09 04:28 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
On 12 Feb, 19:13, Mizter T wrote:
On 12 Feb, 18:43, "Andrew Heenan" wrote:





"Mizter T" wrote ...


Anyway I didn't really mean to focus so much on the issues surrounding
the oncoming ELLX link to Clapham Jn - I think it's great that it's
happening, it completes the picture of an orbital route around London
- but I don't think it's great because it'll look all neat and tidy on
a map, I think it's great because it'll be genuinely useful.


I agree and all credit to Boris for bringing Ken's dream to reality. And I'm
not just being snarky; Ken saw the potential of the North London Line in his
GLC days, and has carried on recognizing that underfunded inner London
routes can be developed for Londoners, and fighting for funding. Boris has
done well not to cut this like he has cut all the other projects - but he
needs to prove himself by focussing on the next lines to be sequestered. As
Ken would have done. Indeed, as Ken announced he would do.


I absolutely agree about Ken and indeed I've made much the same point
in the past - Livingstone has long had a passionate involvement in
London's transport, and he brought this heritage to the table on
becoming Mayor which led on to projects such as the ELLX and the
London Overground takeover. In other words this was his doing, no
doubt!

TfL never got hold of Southern's Metro routes but we can at least be
thankful that their fingerprints are all over the franchise
requirements (more staffed and improved stations, more services etc)
thanks to lobbying by TfL under the old Mayor.

Afraid I can't really see Boris keenly pursuing the strategy of
transferring custodianship of London rail routes over to TfL. I
suppose it's possible that some things could change when the planets
next align themselves, i.e. when the Mayor and the government are of
the same hue (in 2010), though nothing in particular appears to be on
the agenda in that regard.-


I wonder how many other lines would be suitable for "London
Overground" branding anyway?

LTS - No real distinct services

Great Eastern - will be crossrail

West Anglia - possibly Enfield & Chingford services

Great Northern - possibly Welwyn & Hertford services

MML to St Albans - part of Thameslink

Chiltern - not unless the "Chiltern Metro" proposals ever happen.

Great Western - will be Crossrail, possibly West Ealing - Greenford
could be LO branded

SWT - maybe the Hounslow & Kingston loops and Chessington services.

Southern - remains to be seen

Southeastern - maybe the local services to Dartford & Hayes

Andrew Heenan February 18th 09 05:34 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
"Matthew Dickinson" wrote:
I wonder how many other lines would be suitable for "London
Overground" branding anyway?


West Anglia - possibly Enfield & Chingford services

Good idea.

Great Northern - possibly Welwyn & Hertford services

Really should have happened already.

FCC to St Albans - part of Thameslink

Good Idea

SWT - maybe the Hounslow & Kingston loops and Chessington services.
Southern - remains to be seen
Southeastern - maybe the local services to Dartford & Hayes

Some services, rather than whole lines, I suspect.
--

Andrew

"She plays the tuba.
It is the only instrument capable
of imitating a distress call."



Andy February 18th 09 05:58 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
On Feb 18, 5:28*pm, Matthew Dickinson
wrote:
On 12 Feb, 19:13, Mizter T wrote:





On 12 Feb, 18:43, "Andrew Heenan" wrote:


"Mizter T" wrote ...


Anyway I didn't really mean to focus so much on the issues surrounding
the oncoming ELLX link to Clapham Jn - I think it's great that it's
happening, it completes the picture of an orbital route around London
- but I don't think it's great because it'll look all neat and tidy on
a map, I think it's great because it'll be genuinely useful.


I agree and all credit to Boris for bringing Ken's dream to reality. And I'm
not just being snarky; Ken saw the potential of the North London Line in his
GLC days, and has carried on recognizing that underfunded inner London
routes can be developed for Londoners, and fighting for funding. Boris has
done well not to cut this like he has cut all the other projects - but he
needs to prove himself by focussing on the next lines to be sequestered. As
Ken would have done. Indeed, as Ken announced he would do.


I absolutely agree about Ken and indeed I've made much the same point
in the past - Livingstone has long had a passionate involvement in
London's transport, and he brought this heritage to the table on
becoming Mayor which led on to projects such as the ELLX and the
London Overground takeover. In other words this was his doing, no
doubt!


TfL never got hold of Southern's Metro routes but we can at least be
thankful that their fingerprints are all over the franchise
requirements (more staffed and improved stations, more services etc)
thanks to lobbying by TfL under the old Mayor.


Afraid I can't really see Boris keenly pursuing the strategy of
transferring custodianship of London rail routes over to TfL. I
suppose it's possible that some things could change when the planets
next align themselves, i.e. when the Mayor and the government are of
the same hue (in 2010), though nothing in particular appears to be on
the agenda in that regard.-


I wonder how many other lines would be suitable for "London
Overground" branding anyway?

LTS - No real distinct services

Great Eastern - will be crossrail

West Anglia - possibly Enfield & Chingford services

Great Northern - possibly Welwyn & Hertford services

MML to St Albans *- part of Thameslink

Chiltern - not unless the "Chiltern Metro" proposals ever happen.

Great Western - will be Crossrail, possibly West Ealing - Greenford
could be LO branded

SWT - maybe the Hounslow & Kingston loops and Chessington services.

Southern - remains to be seen

Southeastern - maybe the local services to Dartford & Hayes


Like the DC lines Euston - Watford Junction, I would imagine that any
services that transfer to TfL will be the ones that run mainly inside
the current zones, maybe with a terminus just outside. So Southern is
likely to be those running to Caterham, Epsom, Croydon plus the
various Victoria - Crystal Palace - London Bridge / Beckenham etc
(i.e. those formed mainly of 455s), For SWT I would add the Hampton
court and maybe even the Woking / Guildford locals. For Chiltern, the
services via Amersham might qualify (they are effectively part of a
joint service already). Thameslink I would imagine that once services
have settled down, TfL might take over the inner suburban routes, even
if just branding and paying for evening services.

Rupert Candy[_2_] February 18th 09 07:25 PM

East London Line phase 2b to Clapham Jn is GO!
 
On 12 Feb, 19:13, Mizter T wrote:

I wonder how many other lines would be suitable for "London
Overground" branding anyway?

LTS - No real distinct services

Great Eastern - will be crossrail

West Anglia - possibly Enfield & Chingford services

Great Northern - possibly Welwyn & Hertford services

MML to St Albans - part of Thameslink

Chiltern - not unless the "Chiltern Metro" proposals ever happen.

Great Western - will be Crossrail, possibly West Ealing - Greenford
could be LO branded

SWT - maybe the Hounslow & Kingston loops and Chessington services.

Southern - remains to be seen

Southeastern - maybe the local services to Dartford & Hayes


Plus Orpington (both via Grove Park & Herne Hill). The Sevenoaks
services will of course be Thameslink.

--
Current nearest station: Shortlands


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk