Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 21, 11:33*am, "Andrew Heenan" wrote:
That's true. Boltar is under 24 hour surveillance, they get to predict when she's about to hit the Piccadilly Line, and instructions are sent out to mess up her journey. Because she's worth it. Well, no. It's actually because she's an idiot and it gives them something to laugh at. She? That what you dream about late at night is it? Never mind luvvie, there's plenty of places in Soho for you , better head off there (though not on the piccadilly line obviously) and dont' forget the KY. B2003 |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 21, 1:32*pm, Paul Corfield wrote:
That morning, I had a text from TfL about a points failure meaning no service to T5 and minor delays to the rest of the line. The disruption was also on the TfL live travel new page. Odd - oh well, cue Boltar making some remark about LUL not knowing what it's doing if it can't update its internal system. Would I be that mean? Well , actually... B2003 |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 22, 12:41*pm, Ganesh Sittampalam
wrote: You can reduce failure rates with high quality production and maintenance, but you can't eliminate them. A single failure doesn't tell you much about the quality of the underlying system. No , but constant failures all the time does. B2003 |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23 Feb, 09:55, wrote:
On Feb 22, 12:41*pm, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: You can reduce failure rates with high quality production and maintenance, but you can't eliminate them. A single failure doesn't tell you much about the quality of the underlying system. No , but constant failures all the time does. I wasn't aware that the new signalling on the network had been suffering from constant failures. Ganesh |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 23, 11:50*am, Ganesh Sittampalam
wrote: On 23 Feb, 09:55, wrote: On Feb 22, 12:41*pm, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: You can reduce failure rates with high quality production and maintenance, but you can't eliminate them. A single failure doesn't tell you much about the quality of the underlying system. No , but constant failures all the time does. I wasn't aware that the new signalling on the network had been suffering from constant failures. The JLE was doing quite a nice job of regular fsck ups until recently. B2003 |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ganesh Sittampalam" wrote :
No , but constant failures all the time does. I wasn't aware that the new signalling on the network had been suffering from constant failures. I think Boltar was refering to her brain, not the Picc. -- Andrew Interviewer: Tonight I'm interviewing that famous nurse, Florence Nightingale Tommy Cooper (dressed as a nurse): Sir Florence Nightingale Interviewer: *Sir* Florence Nightingale? Tommy Cooper: I'm a Night Nurse Campaign For The Real Tommy Cooper |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 23, 4:32*pm, "Andrew Heenan" wrote:
I think Boltar was refering to her brain, not the Picc. Oh dear, were you too late for Madam Za Za's then? Perhaps you tried #34 of your flaming guide on her and got a boot up the backside? Possibly not quite what you were hoping for? ![]() B2003 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Northern line failure | London Transport | |||
Signal Failure | London Transport | |||
Signal failure on the central line? | London Transport | |||
How can you have a signal failure on an ATO system? | London Transport | |||
Why can't LU cope with a signal failure? | London Transport |