| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
[originally posted to uk.railway]
[x-posted to uk.transport.london] On 22 Feb, 20:54, " wrote: The main contract for London's £16bn Crossrail project is set to be awarded to a US engineering firm, according to an industry expert. Alex Hawkes from Construction News told BBC 5 Live that Bechtel will work on the tunnel connecting east London to Heathrow airport. More at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7904355.stm Not really a surprise. I remember hearing Ken Livingstone on the radio when he was Mayor talking about the Crossrail project - he spoke about how he had a particular company in mind to build it, one with a proven competence. Obviously the choice of contractor for this major project was a somewhat more complicated process than the Mayor just picking one after looking at their brochures, but Crossrail is now a wholly TfL managed project, and Ken was - and Boris is - also Chair of TfL, so the Mayor does have an important role to play. Anyway, the but about proven competence (or some such similar words) immediately led me to think of those behind building the CTRL (aka HS1) - despite all the other issues surround this controversial link it was nonetheless delivered both on time and on budget (both sections 1 and 2). It was built by the Rail Link Engineering (RLE) consortium, which was 52% owned by Bechtel, other owners being Arup, Halcrow and Systra. Bechtel were also brought in to 'save' the over-running Jubilee Line Extension project and ensure it all opened in time for the Millennium (i.e. year 2000), which they did. |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
In message
, Mizter T writes Bechtel were also brought in to 'save' the over-running Jubilee Line Extension project and ensure it all opened in time for the Millennium (i.e. year 2000), which they did. Didn't they do that by just reverting to normal block working instead of the moving block that was being experimented with? -- Clive |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
"Clive" wrote
Bechtel were also brought in to 'save' the over-running Jubilee Line Didn't they do that by just reverting to normal block working instead of the moving block that was being experimented with? It was much more than that. Granted the signalling was the biggest cockup - but the whole project had fallen apart. In the transport business, Bechtel often seem to be the only company to have invested in Microsoft Project! An investment that has repaid them many, many times! Mind you, I have a niggling feeling that they were associated with at least one catastrophe of their own - but I can't fix the memory. -- Andrew "She plays the tuba. It is the only instrument capable of imitating a distress call." |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
On Feb 25, 1:20*pm, "Andrew Heenan" wrote:
Bechtel were also brought in to 'save' the over-running Jubilee Line Didn't they do that by just reverting to normal block working instead of *the moving block that was being experimented with? It was much more than that. Granted the signalling was the biggest cockup - but the whole project had fallen apart. In the transport business, Bechtel often seem to be the only company to have invested in Microsoft Project! An investment that has repaid them many, many times! Mind you, I have a niggling feeling that they were associated with at least one catastrophe of their own - but I can't fix the memory. WCML electrification, Christmas 2007. "oops, we have half as many electrical engineers turned up as we thought we'd ordered" -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
wrote in message...
Mind you, I have a niggling feeling that they were associated with at least one catastrophe of their own - but I can't fix the memory. WCML electrification, Christmas 2007. "oops, we have half as many electrical engineers turned up as we thought we'd ordered" Give that man a peanut! Thanks for that - it's annoying when I forget disasters! -- Andrew Interviewer: Tonight I'm interviewing that famous nurse, Florence Nightingale Tommy Cooper (dressed as a nurse): Sir Florence Nightingale Interviewer: *Sir* Florence Nightingale? Tommy Cooper: I'm a Night Nurse Campaign For The Real Tommy Cooper |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
On Feb 25, 5:53*pm, "Andrew Heenan" wrote:
wrote in message... Mind you, I have a niggling feeling that they were associated with at least one catastrophe of their own - but I can't fix the memory. WCML electrification, Christmas 2007. "oops, we have half as many electrical engineers turned up as we thought we'd ordered" Give that man a peanut! Thanks for that - it's annoying when I forget disasters! But that wasn't a project cockup, it was only a single incident in part of a much bigger project. I'm not sure how much you can blame the project managers for staff not turning up when they should have. If the project hadn't been in such a bad state when Bechtel took over, the delay in the electrification work wouldn't have been such a problem, as there would have been plenty of leeway in the times. Have the been any complete projects in the UK where Bechtel have made a real mess of it? |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
|
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
On Feb 25, 8:49*pm, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 12:22:16 on Wed, 25 Feb 2009, remarked: WCML electrification, Christmas 2007. "oops, we have half as many electrical engineers turned up as we thought we'd ordered" Give that man a peanut! Thanks for that - it's annoying when I forget disasters! But that wasn't a project cockup, it was only a single incident in part of a much bigger project. I'm not sure how much you can blame the project managers for staff not turning up when they should have. Because it was alleged that the "not turning up" was because the engineers had been double booked, not just because they all decided to take the same couple of weeks off sick. Yes, but any double booking would have been by the agencies supplying the staff, not by the project managers. Sure more checks (that the agencies arn't lying) can always been made, but then you get into DfT style micromanagement. |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
|
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
On Feb 25, 10:14*pm, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 13:35:32 on Wed, 25 Feb 2009, remarked: WCML electrification, Christmas 2007. "oops, we have half as many electrical engineers turned up as we thought we'd ordered" Give that man a peanut! Thanks for that - it's annoying when I forget disasters! But that wasn't a project cockup, it was only a single incident in part of a much bigger project. I'm not sure how much you can blame the project managers for staff not turning up when they should have. Because it was alleged that the "not turning up" was because the engineers had been double booked, not just because they all decided to take the same couple of weeks off sick. Yes, but any double booking would have been by the agencies supplying the staff, not by the project managers. Sure more checks (that the agencies arn't lying) can always been made, but then you get into DfT style micromanagement. Are you sure that it's an agency that's culpable? What sort of agency does that if faced with penalty payments for non-performance, and why would they think they'll ever get work again after a stunt like that? I'd be very surprised if the project management company had all the individual details of the staff that would be needed, that's what the agencies are for. Of course blame will lie with the workers who are down to work in two places at once (if that is the case) and who have got the jobs from different agencies. But I don't see how any project management company can take ALL the blame. My original point is that the problem with the workers was one occasion of a much bigger project, if there is something fundamentally wrong with staffing supply, then why didn't happen much more often? |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
|
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
Am Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:26:16 UTC, schrieb Roland Perry
auf uk.railway : agencies are for. Of course blame will lie with the workers who are down to work in two places at once (if that is the case) and who have got the jobs from different agencies. Why keep blaming the workers? What kind of agency signs someone up, sells their services to a client, and then fails to get confirmation from the workers that they'll turn up? What if the workers have been signed up by two different interim agencies for the same job? The workers confirmed that they will be at the assigned place in time, but nobody really noted that the 5 from agency Hire-the-Fire are the same as the 5 from agency Fire-the-Hire? Cheers, L.W. -- ----------------------------------------------------- |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
On Feb 26, 8:26*am, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 15:54:59 on Wed, 25 Feb 2009, remarked: I'd be very surprised if the project management company had all the individual details of the staff that would be needed, that's what the agencies are for. Of course blame will lie with the workers who are down to work in two places at once (if that is the case) and who have got the jobs from different agencies. Why keep blaming the workers? What kind of agency signs someone up, sells their services to a client, and then fails to get confirmation from the workers that they'll turn up? The one where the workers are signed up to more than one agency. A worker may have signed for a morning shift on one job with one agency and an evening shift on another job with another agency, having a shift or two in between (depending on the day) But I don't see how any project management company can take ALL the blame. My original point is that the problem with the workers was one occasion of a much bigger project, if there is something fundamentally wrong with staffing supply, then why didn't happen much more often? Because the big re-wiring projects take place during specific maintenance windows. In this case both Rugby and Liverpool St over the same Xmas holiday. And big re-wiring jobs have happened at the same time before, why should the project managers think it would be any different this time? Both sets of project managers should have realised that they'd been promised "too many" engineers because there simply aren't enough to go round, and even if that penny hadn't dropped when they placed their orders with the agencies, it should have done so on the first day the workers failed to tun up. But that fails to take into account that there might be enough workers, but that more than expected have taken a break over Christmas, maybe not over the whole period, but for a day or two. There were also lots of little OHL jobs from which workers were pulled when the problems became apparent. |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
In message
, at 18:28:53 on Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Lüko Willms remarked: What if the workers have been signed up by two different interim agencies for the same job? The workers confirmed that they will be at the assigned place in time, but nobody really noted that the 5 from agency Hire-the-Fire are the same as the 5 from agency Fire-the-Hire? The workers can't legitimately confirm they'll attend on the same days, to two different agencies. -- Roland Perry |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
|
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 18:28:53 on Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Lüko Willms remarked: What if the workers have been signed up by two different interim agencies for the same job? The workers confirmed that they will be at the assigned place in time, but nobody really noted that the 5 from agency Hire-the-Fire are the same as the 5 from agency Fire-the-Hire? The workers can't legitimately confirm they'll attend on the same days, to two different agencies. But if the second job is offering more money, and the workers are in short enough supply that they can't not be used, can anyone do much about it? (IIRC this was about specialist skilled workers, and so just hauling in someone off the street wouldn't work?) -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
In message , at
18:28:55 on Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Arthur Figgis remarked: The workers can't legitimately confirm they'll attend on the same days, to two different agencies. But if the second job is offering more money, and the workers are in short enough supply that they can't not be used, can anyone do much about it? The agency can't force them to work, but the agency ought to know how many are actually going to turn up. -- Roland Perry |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
On Feb 26, 5:52*pm, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 09:41:53 on Thu, 26 Feb 2009, remarked: Why keep blaming the workers? What kind of agency signs someone up, sells their services to a client, and then fails to get confirmation from the workers that they'll turn up? The one where the workers are signed up to more than one agency. A worker may have signed for a morning shift on one job with one agency and an evening shift on another job with another agency, having a shift or two in between (depending on the day) That's fine, as long as the two sites aren't as far apart as East London and Rugby (and Modulo the Working Time Directive). It's up to the agency to make sure those aspects are OK. Replace agency with agencies and maybe you can grasp the problem. And big re-wiring jobs have happened at the same time before, why should the project managers think it would be any different this time? I don't know - that's why we are blaming the project managers for failing to spot what was going to be different this time. Blaming the project managers for something that has never occured before seems a bit harsh. Why should they question an agency that has provided the workers on all previous occasions? Remember, the original question was: Has Bechtel ever been involved in a disasterous project? I would say not, as the OHL problems that Christmas were only a small (although important) part of something much bigger. Both sets of project managers should have realised that they'd been promised "too many" engineers because there simply aren't enough to go round, and even if that penny hadn't dropped when they placed their orders with the agencies, it should have done so on the first day the workers failed to tun up. But that fails to take into account that there might be enough workers, but that more than expected have taken a break over Christmas, A strange thing to do when your main job is wiring things during maintenance windows like Xmas. Actually, their main job won't be working at Christmas, otherwise they'd be very poor. There will be work all year round on repairs and replacement jobs. And something the agencies should have seen coming weeks ahead when the workers concerned confirmed (or not) their availability. |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
|
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
On Feb 26, 7:57*pm, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 11:20:09 on Thu, 26 Feb 2009, remarked: The one where the workers are signed up to more than one agency. A worker may have signed for a morning shift on one job with one agency and an evening shift on another job with another agency, having a shift or two in between (depending on the day) That's fine, as long as the two sites aren't as far apart as East London and Rugby (and Modulo the Working Time Directive). It's up to the agency to make sure those aspects are OK. Replace agency with agencies and maybe you can grasp the problem. Replace "agency" with "each agency". Blaming the project managers for something that has never occured before seems a bit harsh. Why should they question an agency that has provided the workers on all previous occasions? So what was different this time? Remember, the original question was: Has Bechtel ever been involved in a disasterous project? I would say not, as the OHL problems that Christmas were only a small (although important) part of something much bigger. The Rugby re-wiring was a disastrous project. It was on the TV news day after day. Yes, but Bechtel weren't hired to do just the Rugby re-wiring, they were hired to get costs under control and the WCML upgrade completed to some sort of reasonable budget. What would the alternative be, once the problems became apparent? Postpone it to a later date and so impact on the other parts of the project, or try and get things done at the slot set aside for the work, even if it looks like things will run over. I would be interested to see if they recommended the start of the new timetable in January and how much Bechtel were involved in the day to day decisions and how much 'local' control Network Rail had over matters. Actually, their main job won't be working at Christmas, otherwise they'd be very poor. There will be work all year round on repairs and replacement jobs. But I'd still expect the main work to be major projects during periods when the line was closed (be that Xmas, weekends, or just overnight). If they are all agency staff, then how can they be forced to work weekend or during holiday? |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 18:28:53 on Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Lüko Willms remarked: What if the workers have been signed up by two different interim agencies for the same job? The workers confirmed that they will be at the assigned place in time, but nobody really noted that the 5 from agency Hire-the-Fire are the same as the 5 from agency Fire-the-Hire? The workers can't legitimately confirm they'll attend on the same days, to two different agencies. Have you never had any contact with "temp" workers in what you do Roland? It is quite common for them to confirm attendance and then not do so. tim |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 18:28:55 on Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Arthur Figgis remarked: The workers can't legitimately confirm they'll attend on the same days, to two different agencies. But if the second job is offering more money, and the workers are in short enough supply that they can't not be used, can anyone do much about it? The agency can't force them to work, but the agency ought to know how many are actually going to turn up. Can I have some of this magic potion you're holding? tim |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
In message , at 21:29:46 on Thu, 26
Feb 2009, tim..... remarked: The workers can't legitimately confirm they'll attend on the same days, to two different agencies. But if the second job is offering more money, and the workers are in short enough supply that they can't not be used, can anyone do much about it? The agency can't force them to work, but the agency ought to know how many are actually going to turn up. Can I have some of this magic potion you're holding? If the agency has no clue about the potential attendance record of their confirmed "yes I'll do it" contractors, then only anarchy will result. -- Roland Perry |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
In message , at 21:27:49 on Thu, 26
Feb 2009, tim..... remarked: Have you never had any contact with "temp" workers in what you do Roland? It is quite common for them to confirm attendance and then not do so. They wouldn't get a second chance, in any of the lines of work I've been involved in. -- Roland Perry |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
|
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 21:29:46 on Thu, 26 Feb 2009, tim..... remarked: The workers can't legitimately confirm they'll attend on the same days, to two different agencies. But if the second job is offering more money, and the workers are in short enough supply that they can't not be used, can anyone do much about it? The agency can't force them to work, but the agency ought to know how many are actually going to turn up. Can I have some of this magic potion you're holding? If the agency has no clue about the potential attendance record of their confirmed "yes I'll do it" contractors, then only anarchy will result. And it did. -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 21:27:49 on Thu, 26 Feb 2009, tim..... remarked: Have you never had any contact with "temp" workers in what you do Roland? It is quite common for them to confirm attendance and then not do so. They wouldn't get a second chance, in any of the lines of work I've been involved in. But if the job needs doing, you have to employ them if there are no others with the required skills or availability (at least until such a time as you can recruit full-time staff). -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 21:27:49 on Thu, 26 Feb 2009, tim..... remarked: Have you never had any contact with "temp" workers in what you do Roland? It is quite common for them to confirm attendance and then not do so. They wouldn't get a second chance, in any of the lines of work I've been involved in. I suppose that this does have an effect here. There is only one end customer for a signalling engineer (though lots of intermediate employers), whereas people who do what I do can work for any one of 1000s companies and p*ssing one off isn't career disabling, - point taken. tim |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
"Lüko Willms" wrote ...
What if the workers have been signed up by two different interim agencies for the same job? The workers confirmed that they will be at the assigned place in time, but nobody really noted that the 5 from agency Hire-the-Fire are the same as the 5 from agency Fire-the-Hire? Fine, fine - but no-one has ever suggested that your allegation (sorry, snide implication) is relevant in this case. |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
Am Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:42:30 UTC, schrieb Roland Perry
auf uk.railway : What if the workers have been signed up by two different interim agencies for the same job? The workers confirmed that they will be at the assigned place in time, but nobody really noted that the 5 from agency Hire-the-Fire are the same as the 5 from agency Fire-the-Hire? The workers can't legitimately confirm they'll attend on the same days, same day, same place, same hour to two different agencies. They might have confused it? "Hey, sure I go, you already told me". But it was the other guy who did. Well, OK, this is a faint possibility, more a subject for a film than a possible explanation for the incident which gave rise to this exchange. Cheers, L.W. -- ----------------------------------------------------- |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
On Feb 26, 9:58*pm, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 13:16:02 on Thu, 26 Feb 2009, remarked: What would the alternative be, once the problems became apparent? Postpone it to a later date and so impact on the other parts of the project, or try and get things done at the slot set aside for the work, even if it looks like things will run over. Admitting the over-run earlier would have helped the public. But I'd still expect the main work to be major projects during periods when the line was closed (be that Xmas, weekends, or just overnight). If they are all agency staff, then how can they be forced to work weekend or during holiday? They can't be forced to[1]; but neither should they agree to do it, then change their mind at the last minute. Mp point was that some of the staff may not even have agreed to do it in the first place. How do you plan for something like that, if say, 50% more staff choose to take Christmas off than previous years? [1] Although an agency might well decline to have awkward people like that on its books. -- Roland Perry |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
In message , at
23:18:35 on Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Arthur Figgis remarked: Have you never had any contact with "temp" workers in what you do Roland? It is quite common for them to confirm attendance and then not do so. They wouldn't get a second chance, in any of the lines of work I've been involved in. But if the job needs doing, you have to employ them if there are no others with the required skills or availability (at least until such a time as you can recruit full-time staff). I would cast my net wider. -- Roland Perry |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
|
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... But if the job needs doing, you have to employ them if there are no others with the required skills or availability (at least until such a time as you can recruit full-time staff). I would cast my net wider. Like where? Before you ask, the Portuguese were busy with extending the wires to Barreiro, and now that's been done, it looks like they already have another job to go to. Their Italian counterparts may have gravitated to greater Naples, where there is also wiring to do. -- Tim http://tim-fenton.fotopic.net/ http://timsworkspace.fotopic.net/ http://timfentonstractiondepot.fotopic.net/ New! Ish. |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
In message , at 09:32:02 on Fri, 27
Feb 2009, Tim Fenton remarked: I would cast my net wider. Like where? Before you ask, the Portuguese were busy with extending the wires to Barreiro, and now that's been done, it looks like they already have another job to go to. Their Italian counterparts may have gravitated to greater Naples, where there is also wiring to do. The skill of being the project manager is in knowing where. I won't attempt to second guess the answer. -- Roland Perry |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... I would cast my net wider. Like where? Before you ask, the Portuguese were busy with extending the wires to Barreiro, and now that's been done, it looks like they already have another job to go to. Their Italian counterparts may have gravitated to greater Naples, where there is also wiring to do. The skill of being the project manager is in knowing where. I won't attempt to second guess the answer. Which means you don't know. -- Tim http://tim-fenton.fotopic.net/ http://timsworkspace.fotopic.net/ http://timfentonstractiondepot.fotopic.net/ New! Ish. |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
In message , at 10:26:58 on Fri, 27
Feb 2009, Tim Fenton remarked: I would cast my net wider. Like where? Before you ask, the Portuguese were busy with extending the wires to Barreiro, and now that's been done, it looks like they already have another job to go to. Their Italian counterparts may have gravitated to greater Naples, where there is also wiring to do. The skill of being the project manager is in knowing where. I won't attempt to second guess the answer. Which means you don't know. It means I haven't researched it - why would I have a list of suitable agencies randomly available? -- Roland Perry |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... I would cast my net wider. Like where? Before you ask, the Portuguese were busy with extending the wires to Barreiro, and now that's been done, it looks like they already have another job to go to. Their Italian counterparts may have gravitated to greater Naples, where there is also wiring to do. The skill of being the project manager is in knowing where. I won't attempt to second guess the answer. Which means you don't know. It means I haven't researched it Which means you don't know. - why would I have a list of suitable agencies randomly available? Because, without that kind of information, there would be little point in casting your net wider. -- Tim http://tim-fenton.fotopic.net/ http://timsworkspace.fotopic.net/ http://timfentonstractiondepot.fotopic.net/ New! Ish. |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
In message , at 18:08:50 on Fri, 27
Feb 2009, Tim Fenton remarked: The skill of being the project manager is in knowing where. I won't attempt to second guess the answer. Which means you don't know. It means I haven't researched it Which means you don't know. Why would I, sitting here this Friday evening, know the names of agencies in a different industry to mine, without first researching it? - why would I have a list of suitable agencies randomly available? Because, without that kind of information, there would be little point in casting your net wider. If I was in the industry, and needing the engineers, then that's exactly what I'd have and do. -- Roland Perry |
BBC - US firm 'set for Crossrail deal'
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... The skill of being the project manager is in knowing where. I won't attempt to second guess the answer. Which means you don't know. It means I haven't researched it Which means you don't know. Why would I, sitting here this Friday evening, know the names of agencies in a different industry to mine, without first researching it? Which means you don't know. - why would I have a list of suitable agencies randomly available? Because, without that kind of information, there would be little point in casting your net wider. If I was in the industry, and needing the engineers, then that's exactly what I'd have and do. Switch the lights off when you're done, there's a good chap. -- Tim http://tim-fenton.fotopic.net/ http://timsworkspace.fotopic.net/ http://timfentonstractiondepot.fotopic.net/ New! Ish. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 01:26 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk